More 'Audiophile' bullsh*t

More 'Audiophile' bullsh*t

Author
Discussion

PhilboSE

4,352 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
Bullett said:
cables are more expensive than the speakers?

Am I reading that correctly 287,000 for cables? and 175,000 for the speakers?
Don't forget the 145,000 for the subs. But, that is what true high end costs. Nothing else will do.

Dromedary66

1,924 posts

138 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
From that review, "Finding the perfect cable is like finding the perfect women, you try a few,"

I find it hard to believe that these enthusiasts have "tried" any women.

untakenname

4,969 posts

192 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
I've borrowed an Audison bit tune RTA for this weekend, gonna swap out some capacitors on my rear 6x9's to change the frequency response after adding a new sub to the car and I've noticed that capacitors range all the way from 13p to over £50 (for the same values) https://www.hificollective.co.uk/components/duelun...

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
Dromedary66 said:
From that review, "Finding the perfect cable is like finding the perfect women, you try a few,"

I find it hard to believe that these enthusiasts have "tried" any women.
I read that and cringed mightily.

AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
Flanders and Swann covered this in 1957 with "A song of reproduction"

Michael Flanders said:
Who made this circuit up for you, anyway? Bought it in a shop? Oooh, what a horrible shoddy job they fobbed you off with with.

Surprised they let you have it in this room anyway, the acoustics are all wrong. If you raise the ceiling four feet... put the fireplace from that wall to that wall... you'll still only get the stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard.

I see... I see you've got your negative feedback coupled in with your push-pull-input-output. Take that across through your redded pickup to your tweeter, if you're modding more than eight, you're going to get wow on your top. Try to bring that down through your pre-amp rumble filter to your woofer, what'll you get? Flutter on your bottom!

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
I really don't think these reviewers (or even the people that buy this kit) really listen to music any more. all they're doing is constantly evaluating their systems.

They spend 99% of their time wondering 'what if' - what if I bought this amp, what if I bought that cable etc.

I found myself going down that road a good few years back, and had to give myself a good kick up the arse to remind myself that I enjoy listening to music for the music, not to listen to the kit that's playing it.

Hence I started spending money on CDs instead.
I found myself doing the same. I was sending my Cyrus boxes every time they brought out an upgrade and convincing myself they sounded better. The only really worthwhile upgrade was sending my Audiovector M3 speakers back to Denmark to be upgraded to AvantGarde models. That made a big difference. I settled on midrange Chord cables a long time ago and should probably have gone for the basic ones instead. I have some of each and cannot tell the difference.

TEKNOPUG

18,948 posts

205 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
jmorgan said:
In for a penny... Might as well get the ethernet cable too.
"An additional dose of smoothness combined with an extra sprinkle of resolution simply left my current very high-end USB in the weeds. I didn’t realise how much I was missing until I connected the LS USB."

PhilboSE

4,352 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
"An additional dose of smoothness combined with an extra sprinkle of resolution simply left my current very high-end USB in the weeds. I didn’t realise how much I was missing until I connected the LS USB."
Perhaps it's a Troy Queef pastiche for the audio world and we've all missed the joke?

TonyRPH

Original Poster:

12,971 posts

168 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
I wrote to HiFi world once to complain about their review of a USB cable, and I also stated (in technical terms) why it I thought it shouldn't make any difference.

The editor (also a technical guy) responded with an explanation that was just nonsense.

The reviewer was drawing comparisons at an analogue level for a digital cable - e.g. such superlatives as warmth, and other claims which would generally only apply to an analogue cable (interfacing to a badly designed preamp / amp / DAC etc.) as generally cables should not change the tonal quality.




PhilboSE

4,352 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
There is an isochronous mode for USB data transfers for streaming audio and video which does not have any error detection, correction or retry capabilities. I do not know if it is this mode that is used for these USB audio implementations, but I find it very hard to believe that a serial cable of any quality would introduce bit errors at the types of bandwidths we are talking about. And if there were bit errors, these would be random and would affect all aspects of the carrier data, rather than somehow changing the tonality in isolation.

Of course, if the USB transfer modes used are digital end to end (i.e. with guaranteed data integrity) then it's simple - the cable either works, or it doesn't and any reviewer claiming to hear differences purely on the basis of the cable is kidding themselves.

TonyRPH

Original Poster:

12,971 posts

168 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
<stuff>
Completely agree.

But the likely hood of an error in digital transmission having a (constant) effect on (or even changing) the tonal quality is nil IMHO!

Drop outs yes, and possibly some distortion / sibilance, but to use phrases such as "warmer sound", "analytical", "3d sound stage", "airiness"...

No, just no.

And if there are drop outs or other distortions then the interface is at fault (assuming a good cable).

Perhaps the cables connecting the reviewers ears to his brain need replacement / upgrading :P


B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
Perhaps it's a Troy Queef pastiche for the audio world and we've all missed the joke?
I sadly don't think it is.

They're all just sitting around tossing themselves off over the emperors new clothes.

Now, Zapperators. There's a technology I can get behind.

http://www.russandrews.com/rf-zapperators-with-ban...

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
Not even USB 3.....

98elise

26,568 posts

161 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
PhilboSE said:
There is an isochronous mode for USB data transfers for streaming audio and video which does not have any error detection, correction or retry capabilities. I do not know if it is this mode that is used for these USB audio implementations, but I find it very hard to believe that a serial cable of any quality would introduce bit errors at the types of bandwidths we are talking about. And if there were bit errors, these would be random and would affect all aspects of the carrier data, rather than somehow changing the tonality in isolation.

Of course, if the USB transfer modes used are digital end to end (i.e. with guaranteed data integrity) then it's simple - the cable either works, or it doesn't and any reviewer claiming to hear differences purely on the basis of the cable is kidding themselves.
Indeed. Ultimately a USB deals in binary states. Imagine a light bulb. In an analogue sense it has power, brightness, color, heat etc. In a digital sense it only has off or on, nothing else matters.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
PhilboSE said:
Perhaps it's a Troy Queef pastiche for the audio world and we've all missed the joke?
I sadly don't think it is.

They're all just sitting around tossing themselves off over the emperors new clothes.

Now, Zapperators. There's a technology I can get behind.

http://www.russandrews.com/rf-zapperators-with-ban...
Hum buckets?

TonyRPH

Original Poster:

12,971 posts

168 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
98elise said:
Indeed. Ultimately a USB deals in binary states. Imagine a light bulb. In an analogue sense it has power, brightness, color, heat etc. In a digital sense it only has off or on, nothing else matters.
That's a good analogy, I'll have to remember that one when I'm trying to explain why cables shouldn't make any difference...


jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
There is a dependency on the cable to have certain parameters in the digital domain but nothing expensive.

Of course its up to the listener what they want, bit like a chromed oil filter for my car. Made no difference to the running, I just wanted it.

qube_TA

8,402 posts

245 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
untakenname said:
I've borrowed an Audison bit tune RTA for this weekend, gonna swap out some capacitors on my rear 6x9's to change the frequency response after adding a new sub to the car and I've noticed that capacitors range all the way from 13p to over £50 (for the same values) https://www.hificollective.co.uk/components/duelun...
audio capacitors are very different from regular ones. If you use regular non-audio grade ones they will sound crap.



AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
audio capacitors are very different from regular ones. If you use regular non-audio grade ones they will sound crap.
What's the difference then?

legzr1

3,848 posts

139 months

Thursday 19th April 2018
quotequote all
About £100 an Ohm