How big (or small) is your main TV

How big (or small) is your main TV

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2021
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
It will be a sad day when it gives up the ghost - we'll have to turn the heating up for a start...
Too right, Plasmas do kick out some heat. laugh

JohnnyF2

153 posts

182 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2021
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
42" Panasonic plasma, our only TV. We have room for a bigger telly but the picture is as good as when we bought it nine years ago and it won't be replaced until it dies. For sound we have it wired up to our old Arcam Solo, which powers a couple of Cambridge Audio speakers, which is perfectly good. We're not huge TV or film watchers so we're not bothered about surround sound or 4k. Honestly at 42" I think we'd struggle to see the difference between 1080p and 4k anyway.

It will be a sad day when it gives up the ghost - we'll have to turn the heating up for a start...
We have a 42" Panasonic Plasma too, a 2010 model which is still providing a great 1080p picture. It is a dual-purpose TV, in that in our smallish living room, we do not need the radiator switched-on in that room, even in the depths of winter. The TV provides us with entertainment and keeps the room toasty at the same time. I'm surprised that Panasonic didn't make this more of a selling-point at the time.

21TonyK

11,524 posts

209 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2021
quotequote all
49 in the lounge, 3-4m distance. Should have gone 55 with hind sight but its perfectly ok and replaced a 42 so a bit wary of going too big at the time.

skinnyman

1,638 posts

93 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2021
quotequote all
42" Panasonic 1080p

It is coming up to 10 years old now, so probably due a replacement, but the kids are still at an age where they're liable to throw something through it, so I'm just waiting for the inevitable

Ahonen

5,016 posts

279 months

Tuesday 23rd February 2021
quotequote all
JohnnyF2 said:
We have a 42" Panasonic Plasma too, a 2010 model which is still providing a great 1080p picture. It is a dual-purpose TV, in that in our smallish living room, we do not need the radiator switched-on in that room, even in the depths of winter. The TV provides us with entertainment and keeps the room toasty at the same time. I'm surprised that Panasonic didn't make this more of a selling-point at the time.
hehe We were genuinely feeling a little chilly in the living room last night and couldn't work out why as it has been quite mild recently, then we turned the TV on and felt nice and warm after a few minutes...

Exitleft

930 posts

224 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
165” screen with 4K projector. 2.35:1 wide so normal TV widescreen content is a little smaller.


pmanson

13,382 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
Panasonic 65".

We sit about 5m away so could probably get away with slightly larger (current TV is coming up 5 years old so hopefully we can get a few more years out of it).

The old Jamo sub was replaced before Christmas and the bass is much improved. Speakers are Dali with a couple of cheap ceiling speakers for atmos.


67Dino

3,583 posts

105 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
I heard that the definition of an intellectual is someone whose bookcase is bigger than their TV.

Just saying...

nickfrog

21,149 posts

217 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
jsf said:
37" Panasonic Plasma, it's been brilliant and wont be changed unless it dies.
37" here. Plenty big enough at 1080p in a normal sized room.

Would only go bigger in a dedicated TV room, or if I had a 6m x 6m + lounge for it to be in.
Not sure what a "normal sized room" is but according to this http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html you would need to be at less than 7ft to just about start getting any 1080p resolution benefits...

I personally would need binoculars to enjoy any benefit from a 37, and that's in a modest 18' lounge. Our cheapo 60' Samsung on the other hand is quite immersive. Will probably go for 75' next time around as it will replicate cinematographic viewing distance/size.

kingston12

5,481 posts

157 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
I'm actually surprised how this thread has gone.

It wasn't that long ago on PH that the typical responses to such a question would be:

You shouldn't have a TV in a non-dedicated room at all.
Any TV in a non-dedicated room should be hidden in a cupboard (I actually remember that one).
Nothing bigger than a 14" 'portable' just to turn on when absolutely necessary.

Interesting to see how (some) things change!

I must admit though, if i was in a position to have a separate room for home cinema, then I'd definitely not have one in other rooms either.

kingston12

5,481 posts

157 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
Not sure what a "normal sized room" is but according to this http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html you would need to be at less than 7ft to just about start getting any 1080p resolution benefits...

I personally would need binoculars to enjoy any benefit from a 37, and that's in a modest 18' lounge. Our cheapo 60' Samsung on the other hand is quite immersive. Will probably go for 75' next time around as it will replicate cinematographic viewing distance/size.
Indeed. For me, its all about the immersion level compared to how far you are prepared to sit from the screen.

I'm sitting in my makeshift office at the moment, with a 32" monitor about 3' from my face. If i look up, I can see my 65' TV about 13' further back.

The 32" monitor occupies slightly more of my field of view than the 65" TV, so it would probably be a more immersive experience, but there is no way I'd want to sit that close to a screen to watch a film.


paralla

3,535 posts

135 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
Not sure what a "normal sized room" is but according to this http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html you would need to be at less than 7ft to just about start getting any 1080p resolution benefits...

I personally would need binoculars to enjoy any benefit from a 37, and that's in a modest 18' lounge. Our cheapo 60' Samsung on the other hand is quite immersive. Will probably go for 75' next time around as it will replicate cinematographic viewing distance/size.
I don't believe the "you have to be closer than X to see any benefit above X resolution" argument. I know it's based on science but my experience tells me different.

I replaced a 40 inch 1080p Samsung LED TV with a 65 inch 4K TV and was shocked at the difference sat on the same sofa, the same distance away. I had no idea we'd been slumming it for so long with the old telly. The new one is HDR and has other improvements over the old one, I know it's not just the resolution.

nickfrog

21,149 posts

217 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
paralla said:
I don't believe the "you have to be closer than X to see any benefit above X resolution" argument.
(...)
I know it's not just the resolution.
I think we both agree that it's not just the resolution wink

nickfrog

21,149 posts

217 months

Thursday 25th February 2021
quotequote all
kingston12 said:
Indeed. For me, its all about the immersion level compared to how far you are prepared to sit from the screen.

I'm sitting in my makeshift office at the moment, with a 32" monitor about 3' from my face. If i look up, I can see my 65' TV about 13' further back.

The 32" monitor occupies slightly more of my field of view than the 65" TV, so it would probably be a more immersive experience, but there is no way I'd want to sit that close to a screen to watch a film.
I am enough of a weirdo to take my phone out at the movies (not during the film though) and put it in front of my face to measure how far from my nose the phone has to be to be the same size as the screen. And then do the same experiment in my lounge to establish what size TV I need to replicate that field of view. I am sure there is a more scientific way of doing it though...

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all

Pit Pony

8,557 posts

121 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
In 1987, in a student house we moved the 3 seater sofa to the box room, facing the door.
Room was 5 foot x 6 foot 6 inches, and we put a 32 inch CRT on a stand next to the door. It had no remote control. You could change the channel with your foot. It was that close.
If more than 3 people wanted to watch the telly, one of them had to sit on the window sill.

dvshannow

1,580 posts

136 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
Said in jest no doubt but hearing a room with a plasma makes as little sense as saying incandescent bulbs generate heat so no point in spending g money on low energy upgrades

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
dvshannow said:
Said in jest no doubt but hearing a room with a plasma makes as little sense as saying incandescent bulbs generate heat so no point in spending g money on low energy upgrades
Picture quality is lovely though.

number2

4,308 posts

187 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
Still have a 50inch Kuro plasma going strong since 2008. Lives in the sitting room until it dies. Yes, it kicks out some heat - crazy power consumption relative to today's screens.

Have a 65 inch OLED in the TV room and have a 55inch Frame arriving soon for the kitchen - idea is it's as unobtrusive as possible when not in use, but I can watch the F1 etc while cooking!

AC43

11,486 posts

208 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
I think the tv in the front room is 55. It's quite a large room and could have gone a lot bigger but I would rather invest a lot more in the amp and the speakers.