Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Prometheus - Ridley Scott's 'Alien Prequel' (or not)...

Author
Discussion

SpudLink

5,775 posts

192 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
I’ve been avoiding trailers and this thread for the past few months so that I could go into Covenant without having my opinion pre-determined by the PH consensus. Expectations were not high because I’ve not yet recovered from the traumatic disappointment that was Prometheus.
I think Covenant was OK. On the plus side, it was as good looking as you would expect from Ridley Scott, I did feel a sense of tense anticipation through much of the film, and Fassbender as David was very good. The stupidity level wasn’t on the same WTF scale as Prometheus.
And I liked the fact that the terraforming equipment had the JCB logo.
Unfortunately I didn’t care much for the characters. As a result the deaths had about the same impact as the average teen slasher flick.

I think the fundamental flaw with Prometheus and Covenant is that they should not have tried to connect to the Alien franchise. It feels like Ridly Scott wanted to explore the ‘where do we come from’ theme, but the studio and audience want an Alien film. It’s falling between two stools. An interesting story could have been told about the Engineers, a race of beings who used their own DNA to seed life throughout the galaxy, and then millions of years later decide to wipe out the life they created. Add into that the creation of Man deciding that his creator is “not worthy of his creation”.

Now I’ll go back and read the last 3 months of this thread.



Edited by SpudLink on Monday 22 May 10:42

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
I think the fundamental flaw with Prometheus and Covenant is that they should not have tried to connect to the Alien franchise. It feels like Ridly Scott wanted to explore the ‘where do we come from’ theme, but the studio and audience want an Alien film. It’s falling between two stools. An interesting story could have been told about the Engineers, a race of beings who used their own DNA to seed life throughout the galaxy, and then millions of years later decide to wipe out the life they created. Add into that the creation of Man deciding that his creator is “not worthy of his creation”.
IMO - they should have done it properly - with a real origin story for the Xenos, or forgone them altogether and concentrated on the engineers background and our origins.

As it turns out - we got a mishmash of both, with neither element getting the screen time it needed.

I wonder if we'll get something original in the next movie.......hell even a male lead would make for a nice change, instead of Elen Ripley mk3 (or mk5 if you count the AvP movies) biggrin

Edited by Moonhawk on Monday 22 May 11:46

robemcdonald

8,778 posts

196 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Durzel said:
It's been said better elsewhere but Ridley is brilliant at world building, but everything else is pretty rote. It almost feels as if he sees actors and actors talking as an irritating component he has to crowbar into his worlds.

Having said that it's hard to know how much to blame Ridley for Prometheus and Covenant. He had a hand in creating it, but he didn't write either of the films. I guess one's opinion of him depends on how much you feel that he should protect Alien's (the original film) legacy at the cost of his own financial successes.

I don't think you can put him in the same category as - say - Lucas, who was the sole decision maker with the prequels, etc.
World building isn't just making things look cool. It's establishing coherent framework for the narrative of the movie to take place in.

I will ask a question; whats the gestation period for a xenomorph?

It seems to change as required by the plot IMO.

That's a crucial element, so not great world building.

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

135 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
I will ask a question; whats the gestation period for a xenomorph?
Well, loath as I am to defend this crock of crap, there is an easy get-out on this...

David has managed to engineer the xeno we saw in Covenant within the 10 year he was on that planet. This was his 'first go' with human host, and maybe the experience showed him a weakness - that he needs to address in future xenos. His solution is developed between now and the time of the original Alien movie, why not have this solution requiring the longer gestation period.

This can all be explained in the preamble to the next instalment. He's got a ship full of raw materials to experiment with, and an awful lot of free time.

Yes, it's post hoc. Yes, it was a jarring contradiction in the movie. But this is Hollywood, where common sense and integrity don't earn piles of greenbacks.

robemcdonald

8,778 posts

196 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
robemcdonald said:
I will ask a question; whats the gestation period for a xenomorph?
Well, loath as I am to defend this crock of crap, there is an easy get-out on this...

David has managed to engineer the xeno we saw in Covenant within the 10 year he was on that planet. This was his 'first go' with human host, and maybe the experience showed him a weakness - that he needs to address in future xenos. His solution is developed between now and the time of the original Alien movie, why not have this solution requiring the longer gestation period.

This can all be explained in the preamble to the next instalment. He's got a ship full of raw materials to experiment with, and an awful lot of free time.

Yes, it's post hoc. Yes, it was a jarring contradiction in the movie. But this is Hollywood, where common sense and integrity don't earn piles of greenbacks.
I accept that as an explanation of the difference between this film and the originals, but what about the two instances in this film? The first gestation period was so brief that it makes the process basically unnecessary (the face hugger mays as well spit out the chest burster) the second was much longer. Im not 100% sure when the guy was impregnated, but it was either on the planet or the cargo loader thing. That Alien seemed to take much longer to be "born"
I'm perfectly aware this is documentary footage we are watching, but such inconsistences aren't great world building IMO.

smudgerebt

241 posts

113 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
It works out itself how long it needs.

So that means it can take hours, days, weeks, months, depending on situation.

If it thinks it needs to be "born" quickly to escape from danger or to protect a Queen then hours. If it needs to "hide" till safe and can then be "born" months later, it does just that.

Its a complex Alien world where the films books and graphic novels all do different things.





ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
Went in pretty much blind to this, in fact I only watched Prometheus the other day but I'm a big fan of Alien/s.

Pretty poor, and very stupid, is how I'd sum it up, and I can usually find good in films. I actually preferred Prometheus, it was far less generic than this. In fact I even preferred Life, which was a complete rip off but executed with a sense of fun, the stupidity of that crew was at least vaguely believable stupidity.

I wanted an Engineer back story, after all that was where Prometheus was leading us, instead we got the equivalent of Steven Spielberg popping up half way through Jaws and explaining in great depth how they made Bruce but it kept malfunctioning.

Also, the twist with David, c'mon. I know they didn't exactly try to hide it, but it was so obvious and contrived it was easy to predict EXACTLY where the film was going long before the end.

Edited by ukaskew on Tuesday 23 May 15:50

robemcdonald

8,778 posts

196 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
smudgerebt said:
It works out itself how long it needs.

So that means it can take hours, days, weeks, months, depending on situation.

If it thinks it needs to be "born" quickly to escape from danger or to protect a Queen then hours. If it needs to "hide" till safe and can then be "born" months later, it does just that.

Its a complex Alien world where the films books and graphic novels all do different things.
Not sure if that is supposed to be serious or not.

toastybase

2,225 posts

208 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Absolute drivel. Too much action. Not enough or any suspense. Too much blue filter.


Matt_N

8,901 posts

202 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Saw it last night and have to say I'm disappointed too.

The naive stupidity of the Prometheus crew made an unwelcome return,

No hazard suits when exploring an unknown planet for the first time, people wandering off on their own, touching things they have no idea about - the second guy who touches the pod at the crash site, Captain Oram putting his face into the egg when he has just witnessed David trying to befriend a xeno, Daniels must have known that Walter can self heal, yet she proceeds with assisting to stitch him up, it's all just really dumb.

I also don't know whether I genuinely missed a few things or they just didn't make sense, but how did David acquire those face hugger embryo pods?

vxr8mate

1,655 posts

189 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
I have to agree with much of what Matt said.

I think David 'created' the embryos from Shaw's reproductive organs (a Youtube vid I watched explained it).

The ending was just so predictable and left me wondering how David gained access to the ship's controls without any security clearance.

Also, when Mother informed the crew of the alien life form on board they were straight on it, yet the alien, having just burst from the Sarg appeared fully grown, how?

I expected better.


Skii

1,629 posts

191 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
I got the full IMAX experience last night, almost empty cinema, good times.

Did I like it? I have to say I did, BUT I would have enjoyed it more if I hadn't seen the original Alien 100 times.

I don't like the engineers, I don't like the fact that Ridley has manufactured a back story to the space Jockey that doesn't fit at all with the mysterious and incomprehensible derelict spaceship from the original movie. A thousand year old fossilized 20ft creature that clearly wasn't in any way humanoid, always seemed to me the pilot and the ship in Alien was one single bio-mechanical organism , with a bony exoskeleton that had been ruptured outwards.

I can't forgive Oram for not emptying his gun into David the moment he realised that he was behind it all

Will I be buying it? Hell yes, its a great action space horror romp. Do the crew members make some dumb decisions, of course they do, hell you can't have a sci-fi horror movie without screaming NO YOU IDIOT DON'T DO THAT at a character when they make a dumb decision or they panic of they die as a result of their naivety , its a premise that all films are built on. Christ if every movie character followed every logical H&S protocol and didn't do anything that might endanger themselves or satisfy their curiosity we'd end up with very dull movies indeed.

I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt.







Kaelic

2,686 posts

201 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Had to laugh at David being able to access all the ships systems without even asking what the wifi password was biggrin

Now if the android had of asked one of the crew what the password was, then all bets are off and they would have known he was a baddie!

Venturist

3,472 posts

195 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Kaelic said:
Had to laugh at David being able to access all the ships systems without even asking what the wifi password was biggrin

Now if the android had of asked one of the crew what the password was, then all bets are off and they would have known he was a baddie!
Personally I had no problem with that, Weyland-Yutani probably hasn't had to deal with a robot that has free will, a creative streak and 10 years alone to descend into madness. I can easily see them just default allowing all androids access to ship systems. (Feels suitably shortsighted too, which is about right for them)

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Venturist said:
Kaelic said:
Had to laugh at David being able to access all the ships systems without even asking what the wifi password was biggrin

Now if the android had of asked one of the crew what the password was, then all bets are off and they would have known he was a baddie!
Personally I had no problem with that, Weyland-Yutani probably hasn't had to deal with a robot that has free will, a creative streak and 10 years alone to descend into madness. I can easily see them just default allowing all androids access to ship systems. (Feels suitably shortsighted too, which is about right for them)
We also don't know what happened "at the end" between David and Walter - from memory David asks Walter whether he wants to reign in hell or be a servant in paradise and we aren't shown Walter's answer. It's possible that Walter sided with David, gave him all of the security information and then sacrificed himself (or perhaps is even stowed on the ship somehow).

It's also possible that David "hacked" Walter somehow to get the information.

Over all, there are plenty of bigger plot holes than how David could fool the ship that he was Walter.

Escapegoat

5,135 posts

135 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
youngsyr said:
It's also possible that David "hacked" Walter somehow to get the information.

Over all, there are plenty of bigger plot holes than how David could fool the ship that he was Walter.
This. David is engineered to be a smart enough machine that he could pilot an alien spaceship, engineer DNA, etc.

Plugging into Walter's USB socket and Ctrl+Fing (oo-er) to find the important info was never going to be that difficult for him.

Durzel

12,262 posts

168 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
World building isn't just making things look cool. It's establishing coherent framework for the narrative of the movie to take place in.

I will ask a question; whats the gestation period for a xenomorph?

It seems to change as required by the plot IMO.

That's a crucial element, so not great world building.
Maybe "world building" was too generous a word. I basically meant that he likes making things look cool. smile Everything else is secondary.

I guess the whole gestation thing depends on how much you care about continuity with Alien, etc.. the films subsequent to Aliens, including the AVP franchise - if you recognise them at all - played pretty loose and fast with gestation periods. For what it's worth I agree, I found it distracting how quickly these protomorphs or whatever you want to call them popped out of peoples bodies. Again, I feel like the reason for this is more to do with the fact that Scott/writers simply aren't interested in a slow burning plot at all... they just want the alien to appear and start causing havoc.

A friend of mine said after we came out that the film suffers for the fact that you know there is going to be an Alien (or several) in it.. I disagreed, in Aliens you knew there were going to be lots of them but it didn't stop that being an superlative film, with memorable characters and arcs. I can't even remember more than half of the characters in Covenant and I only watched the film at the weekend.

aquarianone

498 posts

177 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
This. David is engineered to be a smart enough machine that he could pilot an alien spaceship, engineer DNA, etc.

Plugging into Walter's USB socket and Ctrl+Fing (oo-er) to find the important info was never going to be that difficult for him.
Shirly it's even less complicated than that...David just transferred his consciousness over, ie just took over the same body, idea

youngsyr

14,742 posts

192 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
aquarianone said:
Escapegoat said:
This. David is engineered to be a smart enough machine that he could pilot an alien spaceship, engineer DNA, etc.

Plugging into Walter's USB socket and Ctrl+Fing (oo-er) to find the important info was never going to be that difficult for him.
Shirly it's even less complicated than that...David just transferred his consciousness over, ie just took over the same body, idea
Nope, the android at the end couldn't self-heal. Walter could, David couldn't. The android body was definitely David.

ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Wednesday 24th May 2017
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
Plugging into Walter's USB socket and Ctrl+Fing (oo-er) to find the important info was never going to be that difficult for him.
You've just reminded me of the line when they're playing the recorder together. Audible laughs in the cinema.