Grand Designs

Author
Discussion

devnull

3,753 posts

157 months

Thursday 4th April 2019
quotequote all
Jesus wept, that old couples house looks fking rank.

Tacky glittery tiles. TV so high up they’ll break their neck.

What is it with women over the age of 50 choosing purple for everything.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 4th April 2019
quotequote all
Prefer Lynn’s by a country mile but it’s pretty soulless inside imo.

Evanivitch

20,061 posts

122 months

Thursday 4th April 2019
quotequote all
Laurel Green said:
...and why would the under-slab pipe be left filled with water - utterly bonkers!
I'd hate to try and bleed the system of air once it was under a slab, but I was actually surprised to find that underfloor heating systems are just filled with water. Genuinely expected there would be something more complicated than that.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 4th April 2019
quotequote all
devnull said:
Jesus wept, that old couples house looks fking rank.

Tacky glittery tiles. TV so high up they’ll break their neck.

What is it with women over the age of 50 choosing purple for everything.
Mrs G is 53 and hates purple, so there!

abzmike

8,361 posts

106 months

Thursday 4th April 2019
quotequote all
Good on Lynn getting there in the end. And they finally made up round the geriatric sex pond.

MXRod

2,749 posts

147 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
Once more a disappointing GD . Too many unknowns

No explanation of how the roof problem was not foreseen by designers.
Can’t believe the house was scratch built without formal plans .
Surely any architect would have done structural calculations for the overhang.
If it was a design failing then designers should be picking up the tab for the costs of putting it right
.
.Then we did not see fully how it was resolved , was the end wall taken down to complete the re enforcing beam ?

What sort of heating , ground/air source, gas, electric ? how efficient ?
Ventilation ?Heat recovery ?

We jumped from shell buildings to fully fitted and complete
Having said that , whatever your taste , the first two houses were fitted to what looked like a high standard .


Edited by MXRod on Friday 5th April 09:46

Doofus

25,805 posts

173 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
Interesting. That bloke made all sorts of promises he later couldn't keep ("Of course I can build two houses at the same time"). When he backed off Lynne's house, she (possibly unreasonably) assumed that he would have used his tools and equipment to help her, and although he now didn't have the time, those tools and equipment were still part of the agreement.

Lynne seemed like a bit of a liability in the early days, and I felt that the other two cooked up a reason to be pissed off with her, so they could stop helping her as promised, but it wouldn't be 'their fault'.

I don't think for a minute that Lynne's various structural issues would have been avoided if they'd all continued to work together (except perhaps for filling the UFH pipes), and it was a shame she got all the problems (and additional cost) when the other two seemed to have calm waters throughout.

There wasn't a lot of design/construction detail in the programme, but evidently that's not what it is about.

Sheepshanks

32,749 posts

119 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
Evanivitch said:
Laurel Green said:
...and why would the under-slab pipe be left filled with water - utterly bonkers!
I'd hate to try and bleed the system of air once it was under a slab, but I was actually surprised to find that underfloor heating systems are just filled with water. Genuinely expected there would be something more complicated than that.
Bleeding wouldn't be an issue - just force water through - but I can't imagine it was supposed to have water in at that stage of the build.


And how many times have we seen blocks rupture when having concrete poured in? Seems incredibly iffy.


oxford drinker

1,870 posts

229 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
MXRod said:
O......Surely any architect would have done structural calculations for the overhang.…….
No, but a structural engineer should have done

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
The thing that struck me was that the house had a triangular section, and in plan it was skewed. That takes a serious amount of professional calculation to do properly. And all the detailing for the roof/wall junctions is not self-build territory.

I guess the issue with those blocks is that they're made from recycled pallets, so the quality of the base material is probably very variable as is the matrix holding them together. You can't test them all.

MXRod

2,749 posts

147 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
oxford drinker said:
No, but a structural engineer should have done
Well if it was referred , then that bit has been glossed over

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
Doofus said:
Interesting. That bloke made all sorts of promises he later couldn't keep ("Of course I can build two houses at the same time"). When he backed off Lynne's house, she (possibly unreasonably) assumed that he would have used his tools and equipment to help her, and although he now didn't have the time, those tools and equipment were still part of the agreement.

Lynne seemed like a bit of a liability in the early days, and I felt that the other two cooked up a reason to be pissed off with her, so they could stop helping her as promised, but it wouldn't be 'their fault'.

I don't think for a minute that Lynne's various structural issues would have been avoided if they'd all continued to work together (except perhaps for filling the UFH pipes), and it was a shame she got all the problems (and additional cost) when the other two seemed to have calm waters throughout.

There wasn't a lot of design/construction detail in the programme, but evidently that's not what it is about.
Grand Designs stopped being about the technology and engineering many many years ago. It’s been an entertainment show for a long time.

To be fair, unless it’s some new radical system and unless you have zero interest in any of this, everything is fairly well understood by even non professionals these days.


oxford drinker

1,870 posts

229 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
The thing that struck me was that the house had a triangular section, and in plan it was skewed. That takes a serious amount of professional calculation to do properly. And all the detailing for the roof/wall junctions is not self-build territory.

I guess the issue with those blocks is that they're made from recycled pallets, so the quality of the base material is probably very variable as is the matrix holding them together. You can't test them all.
The blue and white triangular house was designed by an architect here in Oxford. Not sure exactly what the client bought in terms of details and other specialist design but I assume it must have been a pretty complete set of information to satisfy building control etc.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 5th April 2019
quotequote all
All of those houses would have been architect (or architectural designer etc) designed and then had all the necessary building regulations and engineering calculations done by the necessary professionals.

What KM eluded to at the beginning was that these builds did not have to go through the normal planning route. That's very different to saying they had no involvement from architects and engineers which I think some on here are assuming.

greygoose

8,258 posts

195 months

Saturday 6th April 2019
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Prefer Lynn’s by a country mile but it’s pretty soulless inside imo.
Her’s was nicer in the end but I didn’t really like either of them. The inside of the couple’s house was dire imho.
Lynn was quite an annoying person but I think the couple treated her badly as it was obvious she would need help to build a house on her own.

bazza white

3,558 posts

128 months

Thursday 11th April 2019
quotequote all
Pain free so far apart from the break up. I wonder if she'll come crawling back.

Evanivitch

20,061 posts

122 months

Thursday 11th April 2019
quotequote all
Are floating stairs... Legal?

bazza white

3,558 posts

128 months

Thursday 11th April 2019
quotequote all
Not sure on the layout on the couples house, the living area was tiny. The single blokes house was nice from the rear but not sure from the front. Both seemed to do a decent job and got what they wanted though.

Doofus

25,805 posts

173 months

Thursday 11th April 2019
quotequote all
I was impressed by the Matt Lucas lookalike. Some of his rivets were a bit wonky, but nothing seemed to daunt him.

Not like most QSs I know.... wink

PositronicRay

27,010 posts

183 months

Friday 12th April 2019
quotequote all
bazza white said:
Pain free so far apart from the break up. I wonder if she'll come crawling back.
He seem besotted, I doubt she'd have to crawl. She'd probably want a toilet door though.