BBC Top Gear 2017 Thread
Discussion
E65Ross said:
That is a sentiment I agree with. It, however, is far from the sentiments of your previous post.
I enjoyed the "old" TG, I can't bloody stand Ant & Dec either.
Suffice to say I liked the old Top Gear but only until it became wilfully moronic and repetitive. There were good parts, excellent parts but there was that dumbed down part which entertained the lower mortals, like dropping pianos on marinas.I enjoyed the "old" TG, I can't bloody stand Ant & Dec either.
I like the new Top Gear even if I don't particularly like Harris' style of presenting.
I haven't seen TGT as I don't want to pay for it, i already pay the BBC.
Overall, it is the more moronic soaps and reality shows that attract the vast audiences. Draw from that what you will.
LuS1fer said:
98elise said:
I'm a member of Mensa and I like old TG...does that mean I'm average intelligence?
In my experience, being a member of Mensa is no guarantee of intelligence, except to members of Mensa who wave it like a badge of honour that nobody cares about.I have no idea how intelligent you are, we all like different things lng may it stay that way.
Getting back to the point, you were saying that Clarkson appeals only to unintelligent people, but I disagree. People just like different things. I don't like Ant and Dec, Soap Opera's, 99% of all Sports, but I don't think that makes fans unintelligent.
LuS1fer said:
E65Ross said:
That is a sentiment I agree with. It, however, is far from the sentiments of your previous post.
I enjoyed the "old" TG, I can't bloody stand Ant & Dec either.
Suffice to say I liked the old Top Gear but only until it became wilfully moronic and repetitive. There were good parts, excellent parts but there was that dumbed down part which entertained the lower mortals, like dropping pianos on marinas.I enjoyed the "old" TG, I can't bloody stand Ant & Dec either.
I like the new Top Gear even if I don't particularly like Harris' style of presenting.
I haven't seen TGT as I don't want to pay for it, i already pay the BBC.
Overall, it is the more moronic soaps and reality shows that attract the vast audiences. Draw from that what you will.
Both New TG and TGT are lacking in different ways. I can see both disappearing on a couple of years.
98elise said:
Intelligence (IQ) is just one factor in what makes someone "Clever". Other factors are equally important like memory, education, personality (attitude/drive etc). In my case I'm 140 (IQ) but have a st memory and crap education. Realistically I'm no more clever than the next person. The person sitting next to me has a Masters Degree, but the highest I've achieved is HND!
Good point that. I've meet some people very highly qualified in formal education who are great at information recall and regurgitating what they have read, but seem to have limited intuition, creativity and problem solving abilities (they can make good teachers). And vica versa of course...First one of the series that failed the wife test - 'this is boring' - as the Cuba bit unfolded so we watched Designated Survivor on Netflix instead.
I watched it solo yesterday and although it was probably a bit weaker than the rest of the series, it was still a decent hour of car telly.
I think my feelings on it are that this incarnation of TG began with fairly low expectations that have generally been exceeded. TGT started with enormous expectations that fell well short. Chris Evans TG felt it like could a FUBAR from the beginning and so it turned out.
I watched it solo yesterday and although it was probably a bit weaker than the rest of the series, it was still a decent hour of car telly.
I think my feelings on it are that this incarnation of TG began with fairly low expectations that have generally been exceeded. TGT started with enormous expectations that fell well short. Chris Evans TG felt it like could a FUBAR from the beginning and so it turned out.
Edited by bennyboydurham on Saturday 22 April 15:29
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff