A very English scandal - Jeremy Thorpe

A very English scandal - Jeremy Thorpe

Author
Discussion

tim0409

Original Poster:

4,398 posts

159 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
I'm really looking forward to this three part drama which starts on BBC on Sunday. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p065sk93

I'm currently reading a fantastic book on the scandal and I find it surreal that a party leader conspired to have his ex-gay lover murdered, paid for using misappropriated party funds, and then tried to brazen it out. I read a biography of Jeremy Thorpe a few years ago, and what interests me is that whilst this was a massive deal when it happened, yet so many people of my generation (born after the trial) are completely unaware of the case. I was telling a friend about the book recently and he thought it was making it up. The press would go into meltdown if it happened today.

Here is the link to the book -

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Very-English-Scandal-Murd...

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
I think I've seen this advertised, Hugh Grant?
Looks really good.
Grant can be good taken away from his fop caricature

tumble dryer

2,016 posts

127 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Halb said:
I think I've seen this advertised, Hugh Grant?
Looks really good.
Grant can be good taken away from his fop caricature
Spotted, with half an eye, a couple of minutes of the production. HG was incredibly believable, and the makeup was masterly.

Agree on him working better outside of his typecast foppish roles. (Gotta say though, he looked quite haggard during the ‘sales pitch’ movie interview.)


ClaphamGT3

11,292 posts

243 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
It's worth remembering that Thorpe was found not guilty of the charges against him...

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
spoiler!!!

ClaphamGT3

11,292 posts

243 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
It's hardly a spoiler though, is it?

MYOB

4,784 posts

138 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
It's worth remembering that Thorpe was found not guilty of the charges against him...
Why is this "worth remembering"?

gooner1

10,223 posts

179 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
It's worth remembering that Thorpe was found not guilty of the charges against him...
It may be worth remebering how quick you jumped to JT's defence.

I was going to ask if you were involved in his trial, but then realised that
if you can't see how your comment was a spoiler, then you would hardly be
any use at his trial.
Unless of course, you were part of the prosecution. smile



Edited by gooner1 on Tuesday 15th May 23:51

ClaphamGT3

11,292 posts

243 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
MYOB said:
Why is this "worth remembering"?
Because the inference of the OP is that Thorpe was guilty when, in fact, he was tried and found Not Guilty.

Whilst Thorpe lacked personal judgement, he did much during his time in politics to promote human rights and to create a more liberal society.

It is telling that, in the 1990s John Major wanted to give him a peerage and the odious hypocrite Paddy Ashdown blocked it

MYOB

4,784 posts

138 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
MYOB said:
Why is this "worth remembering"?
Because the inference of the OP is that Thorpe was guilty when, in fact, he was tried and found Not Guilty.

Whilst Thorpe lacked personal judgement, he did much during his time in politics to promote human rights and to create a more liberal society.

It is telling that, in the 1990s John Major wanted to give him a peerage and the odious hypocrite Paddy Ashdown blocked it
Ah, understood. Although I cannot comment on him being found not guilty as I don't know enough about the case.

Certainly worth getting the book though.

alsaautomotive

684 posts

200 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
"You are now to retire (as indeed should I) carefully to consider your verdict of not guilty."

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
Because the inference of the OP is that Thorpe was guilty when, in fact, he was tried and found Not Guilty.

Whilst Thorpe lacked personal judgement, he did much during his time in politics to promote human rights and to create a more liberal society.

It is telling that, in the 1990s John Major wanted to give him a peerage and the odious hypocrite Paddy Ashdown blocked it
He was, although there was criticism afterwards of apparent bias shown by the judge. he judge's summing up was memorably satirised by Peter Cook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U

Halmyre

11,185 posts

139 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
alsaautomotive said:
"You are now to retire (as indeed should I) carefully to consider your verdict of not guilty."
Beat me to it. Amzing what Peter Cook could do when he could be bothered (or when provoked, in this case).

Derek Smith

45,613 posts

248 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
He was, although there was criticism afterwards of apparent bias shown by the judge. he judge's summing up was memorably satirised by Peter Cook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U
Not far from the truth in some ways.

The judge was, many suggested at the time, out of his depth. The most important factor is that Thorpe hired Carmen. If that isn't a plea of guilty I don't know what is.


tim0409

Original Poster:

4,398 posts

159 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Dr Jekyll said:
He was, although there was criticism afterwards of apparent bias shown by the judge. he judge's summing up was memorably satirised by Peter Cook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyos-M48B8U
Not far from the truth in some ways.

The judge was, many suggested at the time, out of his depth. The most important factor is that Thorpe hired Carmen. If that isn't a plea of guilty I don't know what is.
It wasn't just the summing up, it was his entire approach to the case, most notably his complete and utter disdain for the leading prosecution witnesses throughout the case, which must have had an impact on the jury. The consensus at the time was that the decision to choose him was suspect, although the person who appointed him was a friend of Thorpe...

I agree that Carmen very much swung the case in Thorpe's favour; he took the case on a reduced fee in the full knowledge that the publicity would be invaluable to his career prospects.

From what I read, David Steele had a tacit agreement that the party would not pursue Thorpe for the misappropriated party funds (used to pay Scott and the would be hitman Andrew Newton, donated legitimately by Jack Hayward) on the understanding the Thorpe would play no future role in public life, which is why they blocked any appointment to the HOL. In any case, notwithstanding the verdict, it was absolutely clear to those who followed the case (and the evidence) that Thorpe was guilty (not just conspiracy, but also fraud), and I'm not sure a peerage would have been entirely appropriate.

tim0409

Original Poster:

4,398 posts

159 months

Sunday 20th May 2018
quotequote all
Heads up - starts at 9pm

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 20th May 2018
quotequote all
Its well done the old fashioned bus seats haircuts etc
And I really like the actor as Q

Gargamel

14,974 posts

261 months

Sunday 20th May 2018
quotequote all
The book is awesome

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 20th May 2018
quotequote all
I came across this interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQbRcdQfMb0

such politeness and courtesy
Something missing from today

tim0409

Original Poster:

4,398 posts

159 months

Sunday 20th May 2018
quotequote all
techiedave said:
I came across this interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQbRcdQfMb0

such politeness and courtesy
Something missing from today
Good find, I watched this documentary and found it really interesting -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ck9hZGV59Q