RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S 4-door Coupe: UK Drive

RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S 4-door Coupe: UK Drive

Thursday 24th January 2019

2020 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S 4-door Coupe | UK Review

AMG's latest big, bad, 600+hp coupe makes it to the UK - stand well back...



Almost a decade and a half ago, at the Paris motor show of 2004, Mercedes revealed something nobody had seen before: the CLS55 AMG. Here was a four-door, four-seat executive car with the same powertrain as an E55 AMG, yet which cost more on account of its swoopy good looks and coupe glamour. It'll never catch on, came the cries; how wrong they were.

Today there are not only competitors from a host of different manufacturers, proving the validity - at least in terms of commercial success - of the flagship four-door coupe, but Mercedes' contemporary take on the idea is rather more serious again. The supercharger is long gone, of course, this new GT 4-door using the imperious twin-turbo 4.0-litre, yet power is up by 170hp and torque by 148lb ft. That old CLS was hardly lacking in potency, either, with 469hp and 516lb ft - be in no doubt, this GT is obscenely brisk, those colossal outputs only losing their battle with 2,000kg at 196mph.

Still, today is not for Autobahn antics, Drift Mode displays of singed Cup 2s or supercar-baiting lap times; along with the A35, the GT 63 has been launched over here in a freezing, wintry Scotland. It really doesn't get much more 'real world'. Not only does it mean the car is on Michelin winter tyres (the Cup 2 option is one of the things that marks a GT out from the E63), it means the various shenanigans possible through AMG Dynamics appeal as much as a swim in the nearby North Sea - too much danger of being exposed, doing yourself harm and achieving public notoriety. It'll be a sensible-ish drive at sensible-ish speeds, to establish whether the GT can justify its premium over the already mighty E63, and also to figure out its standing against rivals like the Porsche Panamera Turbo.


Is it fair for journalists in sweatshirts and trainers to comment on what a car costing £140,000 looks like? Probably not - yet here we are. It would be a stretch to call the GT 4-Door conventionally beautiful, though that's an accusation that could be levelled many a car nowadays. What the car definitely possesses is presence, a dramatic shape for this sector and some lovely details that make it look expensive even to those who know little about cars.

The interior is far easier to heap near-unequivocal praise on. By combining the switchgear arrangement seen in the two-door AMG GT and the sense of opulence found in the big Mercedes saloons, with new tech (like the wheel-mounted mode selector), the 63's interior is fabulous. It isn't too flashy, it isn't too restrained, it simply treads the line perfectly for a dynamic yet luxurious grand tourer.

By and large, that impression of impeccably struck compromise extends to the way the GT 4-door drives. While based on the MRA architecture that also underpins the E-Class, this GT has a stronger chassis than any stablemate and also receives a bespoke steering and suspension tune, presumably to make it feel a little more GT than 63.


In all honesty, with the caveat of having driven the two so far apart, the GT feels to ride very similarly at low speed to an E63. That means pretty rigidly in fact, car clenched and unrelenting even in the most accommodating setting of the AMG Ride Control+ suspension. Is it more excusable in a car of a more sporting bent? Perhaps, though there's a suspicion a Panamera might be a little less tough.

Above about 30mph or so, concerns evaporate. At motorway speeds the stability is faultless, refinement superb and the powertrain near-perfect, happy to delve into bountiful torque reserves rather than shuffle down the nine-speed gearbox. Still, when it does that, the gearchanges are swift and decisive, and the commensurate jump in performance is huge. All too soon the thought of flying home seems terribly inconvenient; the prospect of 564 miles in a GT 4-door sounds like bliss.

If anything, the big Benz is even more likeable on a twistier road. The E63 is no blunt instrument, yet the GT takes its dynamism up markedly. The suspension and steering work mean the car is both more composed and communicative than the other four-door 63, but it's the four-wheel steer - first seen on the AMG GT R, don't forget - that has the biggest impact. While always feeling natural and consistent, the GT is more direct, more nimble and more accurate than an E63 has ever been, never falling into the occasional 4WS trap of trying to contrive something that isn't there. The tech doesn't attempt to convince the driver that the GT is a substantially smaller car; instead it simply contributes to a feeling of immediacy and immersion seldom seen in something this big.


On the fast, flowing A-roads near the Cairngorms National Park, indeed even on the smaller roads around there, the GT 63 is immense; there's trust in the precision of the front end and the traction of the rear (albeit with a rear-driven balance to the 4WD certainly apparent), unimpeachable body control, powerful brakes and all the V8 thunder you could ever desire. Comfort mode with the exhaust on actually works well as a catch all setting, though there's something addictive about the intensity and aggression of the sportier settings, particularly with a ride that's not as punishing as expected. If your conscience can live with two tonnes and five metres of what feels like a four-wheeled destroyer doing its thing in public, then go for it - there are few more caddishly mischievous (yet hugely entertaining) ways to travel.

Then, seamlessly and as required, the GT can (mostly) settle back into executive express for whatever task is next. The duality is the key to this 63's charm and appeal, delivering both extra luxury and a hit of additional dynamism over the equivalent E-Class; just how broadly talented that car is shows what an impressive display the GT has put on. Whether it's worth so much more will ultimately be up to buyers to decide, though there's absolutely no denying that a 600hp, £95k E-Class would feel like a tangible step down in performance, excitement and sense of occasion after this - it really is that good. For those in the fortunate (and rare) position where a near-£150k four-door coupe is a viable prospect, don't do anything without driving a Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S 4Matic + 4-door Coupe - the name might be confusing, but the car itself is absolutely compelling.


SPECIFICATION - MERCEDES-AMG GT 63 S 4-DOOR COUPE

Engine: 3,982cc, V8, twin-turbo
Transmission: 9-speed 'multi-clutch' transmission, 4Matic+ 4WD
Power (hp): 639@5,500-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 664@2,500-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.2sec
Top speed: 196mph
Weight: 2,045k
MPG: 25.2mpg
CO2: 256g/km
Price: £135,550











Author
Discussion

drpep

Original Poster:

1,758 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Not sure about the Disney Ride cabin illumination. Other than that, looks like a rather pleasant, express ride.

aston addict

421 posts

158 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Interior looks like standard E with center console from AMG GT and a wheel with buttons-a-plenty. And the looks - to my eyes at least - not as pretty as the panamera (a huge improvement over the ugly duckling 1st gen). And is this based on the E platform rather than stretched GT platform? Sounds like it is.

Sounds like a lot of cash for what it is.

RDMcG

19,136 posts

207 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Looks awkward to me - not a styling masterpiece.

Guffy

2,311 posts

265 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
I'm having the same feeling i got when the Panamera first came out... maybe it looks better in the flesh, but there's no way i would ever be paying £140k for one.

British Beef

2,209 posts

165 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
The CLS 63AMG shootingbrake, is better looking, same underpinnings, same running gear, more practical and 30-40% cheaper - no brainer!

Also something that I find really dissappointing in a car of this value, is how utterly crap the cavity left by the extended wing looks. Make a fixed wing that looks good all the time OR engineer a solution that looks as neat up as it does down. Unacceptable IMO for a car of this cost and perceived quality!!!


dinkel

26,932 posts

258 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
British Beef said:
The CLS 63AMG shootingbrake, ...
I wonder how it feels like. Liked the Panamera GTS ST last week.

Uncool

486 posts

281 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
British Beef said:
The CLS 63AMG shootingbrake, is better looking, same underpinnings, same running gear, more practical and 30-40% cheaper - no brainer!
There is no CLS shooting brake anymore. And the previous generation was also based on the previous generation E class with those underpinnings, not the current 4 litre turbo etc. A fine car it was, but you can't compare them like you have.

Miserablegit

4,021 posts

109 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Profile picture does it no favours.
Looks like the offspring of a bmw ( any) to the b pillar and an amg ( not that one) pacer at the rear.
Front looks good but could do without the tart’s boudoir interior lighting.


easytiger123

2,593 posts

209 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Staggeringly fast but that cabin and the poncy lighting are gash, and I dare say will date faster than an avocado bathroom suite.

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
easytiger123 said:
Staggeringly fast but that cabin and the poncy lighting are gash, and I dare say will date faster than an avocado bathroom suite.
They look a lot more subtle in the metal than in pictures and you can at least switch them off.

I like the interior, personally, but as with most other "four door coupes" the external proportions are just appalling. Sounds like it fulfills its remit in other ways admirably though.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 24th January 08:24

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Fantastic piece of engineering, want. cool

BIRMA

3,805 posts

194 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Should be called the AMG Panamera.

robemcdonald

8,761 posts

196 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
I like it, but the rear overhang spoils the look in profile.

If anyone is good at photoshop it would be interesting to see how it looks with the rear wheel moved back a bit (about half a wheel diameter)

Reciprocating mass

6,029 posts

241 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Amsterdam spec mood lighting rofl

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Reciprocating mass said:
Amsterdam spec mood lighting rofl
I was thinking Berlin night club. (Plus iPads & Rover SD1)

robemcdonald

8,761 posts

196 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Forgive my mediocre effort


redroadster

1,737 posts

232 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Pimp my ride helped with interior ,it's brutal fast but not classy looking no comparison to Maserati saloon styling far nicer .

p1stonhead

25,524 posts

167 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
£135k? Blimey!

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Looking forward to 2029 when some buys one as a 'shed' and tells us of the ruinous running costs.

flowman

103 posts

209 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
How much! Bonkers. Half price in a couple of years and it will be an attractive proposition.