BBC War of the Worlds

Author
Discussion

Silverage

2,034 posts

130 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
I wonder if the original plan was to show it linearly, but they then realised that all the later stuff was arse-numbingly dull and that nothing at all actually happens in it, so they had no choice but to edit it with all the flash-forwards.

What would a “director’s cut” be like where they put it all in order and ditched 90% of the later “red-sky” stuff? Probably still rubbish.

Oh, that kid they rescued from the beach - did she get a single word of dialogue before she was squashed by the Martian? That was bizarre. Maybe she was mute so they could shoehorn a disability in there as well.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
techiedave said:
It was a philosophical and hopeful ending.
The green shoot was a symbol that things would return to normal. It was also symbolic of the heroines new found sexual freedom.
But smashing those belljars is quite unsustainable and sending out the wrong message.

Rumblestripe

2,936 posts

162 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
techiedave said:
It was a philosophical and hopeful ending.
The green shoot was a symbol that things would return to normal. It was also symbolic of the heroines new found sexual freedom.
It was a literal face palm moment.

Oh and "the heroines new found sexual freedom"... WTAF?

67Dino

3,583 posts

105 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
I’m finding the flash forward device pretty annoying too. Plus I keep half expecting a flashback to 18th century Cornwall...

clive_candy

557 posts

165 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
Oh Lord, it was bad!

smn159

12,654 posts

217 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Killer2005 said:
Terrible.

Could have been so much better had they not gone so pc with it.
It's the BBC, what did you expect?
Nothing to do with 'pc' - whatever that is.

It was just st.

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
smn159 said:
Nothing to do with 'pc' - whatever that is.

It was just st.
How do you know it wasn't 'pc' if you don't know what 'pc' is? hehe

timbo999

1,293 posts

255 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
'And before we judge of them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races. The Tasmanians, in spite of their human likeness, were entirely swept out of existence in a war of extermination waged by European immigrants, in the space of fifty years. Are we such apostles of mercy as to complain if the Martians warred in the same spirit?'

Chapter 1, page 1 of the novel... so some of the themes in the TV adaption are not so far adrift... still boring though!

thegreenhell

15,327 posts

219 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
It was at least as bad as the last series of Dr Who.

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
How do you know it wasn't 'pc' if you don't know what 'pc' is? hehe
hehe

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

83 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
timbo999 said:
'And before we judge of them too harshly we must remember what ruthless and utter destruction our own species has wrought, not only upon animals, such as the vanished bison and the dodo, but upon its inferior races. The Tasmanians, in spite of their human likeness, were entirely swept out of existence in a war of extermination waged by European immigrants, in the space of fifty years. Are we such apostles of mercy as to complain if the Martians warred in the same spirit?'

Chapter 1, page 1 of the novel... so some of the themes in the TV adaption are not so far adrift... still boring though!
I would have preferred a speccy old pipe smoking professor to make this point in a meeting with all the bigwigs.
During the somber conference a tea lady* would have wheeled in a trolly with an assortment of biscuits and the mood would
suddenly lighten for a bit.
  • only female role in the production lol

Easternlight

3,430 posts

144 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
Just can't get my head around how the BBC could get this so wrong irked

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 2nd December 2019
quotequote all
The chances of anything coming from Mars were a million to one.

Probably about the same as a cost per viewer ratio

droopsnoot

11,927 posts

242 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
techiedave said:
It was a philosophical and hopeful ending.
Didn't the book end with a second wave of stuff coming from Mars, with the suggestion that they'd adapted and would remember not to get out of their tripods this time? So not quite as hopeful. (I say "the book", I just seem to recall that from the Jeff Wayne record).

techiedave said:
The green shoot was a symbol that things would return to normal. It was also symbolic of the heroines new found sexual freedom.
As they'd seemingly found a way to kill off the red weed, I was surprised that the green shoot in the bell jar was surrounded by weeds, that they hadn't spent a few minutes just digging out around it. And she'd broken the jars, in a scene that reminded me of Blackadder the Third: "Hurrah! It's the Scarlet Pimpernel. ... And you've killed him."

I sat through it. I normally steer clear of stuff set at this point in history because it's usually quite dreary, and I don't watch TV for dreariness. I should have stuck with that, really. I mean, the story itself isn't all that cheerful, but then neither was "Survivors" and I enjoyed that so much more.

timbo999

1,293 posts

255 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
The epilogue of the book notes that a second invasion is possible, maybe likely, but also notes that the Martians might have invaded Venus (!?!) but there is no second invasion in the book. Jeff Wayne's musical ends with a NASA trip to Mars meeting heat ray bearing aliens.

There does seem to be a lot of criticism of the TV adaption based on folks misremembered idea of what's in the book coloured by Jeff's version!

Blue383

86 posts

117 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
You really have to work hard to turn War of the Worlds into this sort of turgid mess. Can’t fault the actors, the production values, or the CGI, but the story telling and pace were dreadful.

As for the whole flash forward thing, it was just a distraction that sucked any pace out of the plot.

Bullett

10,886 posts

184 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
I managed to make it to the end but it was struggle.
Slow beyond comprehension, I was actually happy when the Martian got George. I liked the brother but he felt like he was in the wrong era. Although his speech that it's ok to be a liberal in your front room but in the field with the enemy you get a different view was good.
The flash forward stuff didn't work.I think they missed the lecture at cinema school of show don't tell. Having the characters explain the Martians had died was just a damp squib.



Mark-C

5,081 posts

205 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
Zirconia said:
BBC does good work, this was a dud. Not overly worried, cant get it right all the time.
This really sums it up for me. Caught up on last two episodes last night. Mrs-C thought it was OK and I was happy they kept the colonial and religion bashing from the book (yeah I'm one of those people!) but bloody hell it dragged ...

There's a lot on the BBC I don't like (including this) but plenty enough that I do

droopsnoot

11,927 posts

242 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
timbo999 said:
The epilogue of the book notes that a second invasion is possible, maybe likely, but also notes that the Martians might have invaded Venus (!?!) but there is no second invasion in the book. Jeff Wayne's musical ends with a NASA trip to Mars meeting heat ray bearing aliens.
Now you've said that, I have a vague idea that there's a "second edition" version of the musical version, with an extra bit on the end. I'm sure mine doesn't end like that, but it's ages since I've played it. I thought the version I heard was more subtle. (ETA - seems not, if Wiki is correct. I must just have forgotten that bit.) I haven't read the book, though.

timbo999 said:
There does seem to be a lot of criticism of the TV adaption based on folks misremembered idea of what's in the book coloured by Jeff's version!
I'd freely admit the only version I've any experience of is the record. It's been a bit jarring hearing spoken extracts that are very similar, presumably from the book, but then not having the music that came immediately after. Right at the very start, the "no-one would have believed" speech is there, and even though I knew it wouldn't, part of me wanted to hear the "dah dah duuuummmm".

Clockwork Cupcake

74,539 posts

272 months

Tuesday 3rd December 2019
quotequote all
droopsnoot said:
Right at the very start, the "no-one would have believed" speech is there, and even though I knew it wouldn't, part of me wanted to hear the "dah dah duuuummmm".
OOOOOOO-LAAAAAAAAAA!

smile