The Irishman on Netflix
Discussion
Started watching it last night and after an hour thought it was a bit slow so looked to see how long left. "Another two hours" switched off with the intention of watching the rest later but probably won't.
It would be OK if cut down into a mini series but ideally speeded up and fitted into 1hr 45.
It would be OK if cut down into a mini series but ideally speeded up and fitted into 1hr 45.
Chestrockwell said:
If anybody liked this film and you haven’t seen Boardwalk Empire, be sure to give that a go because the dialogue is similar.
Was a big fan of Boardwalk and am really enjoying this film so far, but after 2 hours i will be watching the rest laterEdited by Chestrockwell on Thursday 5th December 00:36
One thing that is annoying me though is the grainy image, there is no excuse for such a big film of this budget to look so average
Enjoying to see these legends back on the screen, but that shop scene was awful
Blackpuddin said:
Got halfway through it last night, will finish the job tonight, harmless entertainment even if it does feel like every other Mafia film. Do Mafiosi really spend all their lives in restaurants and bars?
I'm watching it in segments. That thought about all the meetings in bars, diners and restaurants crossed my mind as well. Maybe it's how they do/did things.If I'd seen it without having heard anything about 'De-Aging' it wouldn't have occurred to me that there was anything going on other than the usual makeup and prosthetics, I've no idea what the hype was all about.
Trouble is, knocking 20 years or so off Robert De Niro isn't enough to stop it looking a bit daft having his character introduced as 'the kid'
Trouble is, knocking 20 years or so off Robert De Niro isn't enough to stop it looking a bit daft having his character introduced as 'the kid'
The Irishman in Conversation that follows the film for those of a nerdy disposition, is quite interesting.
Something I hadn't picked up on was how the three main actors looked the age of the characters they played at various points throughout the story and this is explained.
Great film but as others have said, quite a task to manage it in one sitting.
Something I hadn't picked up on was how the three main actors looked the age of the characters they played at various points throughout the story and this is explained.
Great film but as others have said, quite a task to manage it in one sitting.
StevieBee said:
The Irishman in Conversation that follows the film for those of a nerdy disposition, is quite interesting.
Something I hadn't picked up on was how the three main actors looked the age of the characters they played at various points throughout the story and this is explained.
Great film but as others have said, quite a task to manage it in one sitting.
That might have been what they went for but none of them looked as young as they were meant to be in the younger scenes. Something I hadn't picked up on was how the three main actors looked the age of the characters they played at various points throughout the story and this is explained.
Great film but as others have said, quite a task to manage it in one sitting.
Frank was 29 at the beginning of the film. De Niro never looked anything approaching that young.
Watched a bit more of it tonight. I obviously wasn't in the mood for watching bad guys bump each other off as much as I was on the weekend. I'll watch the rest of it on Saturday. I'm actually enjoying it in a perverse way. The characters are totally unlikable but you have to admire the way in which Sheeran accepts without much reservation the "house painting" tasks he's given. I wonder what his final total was by the time he "retired".
I watched it at the weekend and thought it was over hyped and over long. The de-aging was poor and made the story confusing (it was only the cars in frame that enabled the viewer to work out when each scene was supposed to be set).
A so-so story, cobbling together conspiracy theories to make it seem more historical and important than it was.
If this didn't have 'names' attached to it, it would (should?) never got made.
Goodfellas is still the best mafia film made (better than the godfather in my opinion). This turd is 4 whacks out of 10.
A so-so story, cobbling together conspiracy theories to make it seem more historical and important than it was.
If this didn't have 'names' attached to it, it would (should?) never got made.
Goodfellas is still the best mafia film made (better than the godfather in my opinion). This turd is 4 whacks out of 10.
Pretty much all my thoughts have been posted up by other earlier in the thread-even the Pacino as Les Patterson one
I do find a lot of Scorsese and his ilk assume that the audience know American history a little better than they do-my wife gave up and went to bed as she just has no clue about it all which is understandable-she's a British woman in her thirties. Not only historically, she couldn't follow his marriage break up either-who was the new wife? What happened to the old-did they all get along?
I think if you take historical events into consideration it flows a little better and could even have been longer-it almost felt as though it was too long for a movie but too short for a mini series.
If they perhaps made it a 4 or 5 parter you'd get more time to invest in each character and sub plot, an hour on each story with the over-riding arc. As above, his family could have taken up an episode all by itself and you might actually start to care about his daughter, which when you think about it was the story arc that made the story be told.
Quite why they didn't use a body double on the ttting De Niro gave the shopkeeper I'll never know but I personally felt everything was worth it to get Pesci out of retirement. He was great, really good and even better that he could do something different to his portrayals in Casino and Goodfellas.
I fancy giving it another watch actually, not something i do very often these days.
I do find a lot of Scorsese and his ilk assume that the audience know American history a little better than they do-my wife gave up and went to bed as she just has no clue about it all which is understandable-she's a British woman in her thirties. Not only historically, she couldn't follow his marriage break up either-who was the new wife? What happened to the old-did they all get along?
I think if you take historical events into consideration it flows a little better and could even have been longer-it almost felt as though it was too long for a movie but too short for a mini series.
If they perhaps made it a 4 or 5 parter you'd get more time to invest in each character and sub plot, an hour on each story with the over-riding arc. As above, his family could have taken up an episode all by itself and you might actually start to care about his daughter, which when you think about it was the story arc that made the story be told.
Quite why they didn't use a body double on the ttting De Niro gave the shopkeeper I'll never know but I personally felt everything was worth it to get Pesci out of retirement. He was great, really good and even better that he could do something different to his portrayals in Casino and Goodfellas.
I fancy giving it another watch actually, not something i do very often these days.
ColdoRS said:
I’m no movie buff, but I thought it was garbage.
1h50m into it and i’d lost interest but thought I owed it my attention so powered through - wish I hadn’t bothered.
Unfortunately not a classic, too long and a little awkward watching the old boys do their thing at times.
Agreed, absolute long in the tooth mafia rubbish1h50m into it and i’d lost interest but thought I owed it my attention so powered through - wish I hadn’t bothered.
Unfortunately not a classic, too long and a little awkward watching the old boys do their thing at times.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff