Fuel duty - an absolute skewering.
Discussion
colonel c said:
I'm suprised Cameron and Osborne went for this. I'm wondering why. Is there likely to be snap election perhaps?
Hardly. More like Osborne couldn't face losing a vote on this next week because his own party backbenchers side with Labour over defering a tax rise Labour implemented. turbobloke said:
All we 'learnt' from that interview which we didn't know before was that an experienced assertive personality on home turf can verbally hector and harass an inexperienced less assertive personality playing away, but that's hardly news or learning for plenty of us 
What a strange view! She's a professional politician, a minister not some shy schoolgirl.
She should have known the answers and gone there prepared, it's not as if Paxmans style of interviewing is a secret.
eccles said:
turbobloke said:
All we 'learnt' from that interview which we didn't know before was that an experienced assertive personality on home turf can verbally hector and harass an inexperienced less assertive personality playing away, but that's hardly news or learning for plenty of us
What a strange view! eccles said:
She's a professional politician, a minister not some shy schoolgirl.
She should have known the answers and gone there prepared, it's not as if Paxmans style of interviewing is a secret.
As mentioned earlier being prepared is one thing, being prepared (or allowed) to convey the information is another. If you don't get it, I can see why you need to use Paxman's blood pressure to work out what's going on, but in reality it won't tell you much. Entertain you, probably.She should have known the answers and gone there prepared, it's not as if Paxmans style of interviewing is a secret.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff