Max Clifford arrested on suspicion of sexual offences
Discussion
Burwood said:
AnotherClarkey said:
And hundreds, if not thousands of people knew what he was and had the means to expose him but didn't.
The audio was damning. Just terrible. I had forgotten how it all blew up-saville of courseAnotherClarkey said:
I think they need to go the way of the News of the World. They were enabling and complicit in paedophilia.
Haven't the mail group just been sued for printing something they reported.Are they being condemned for both printing and not printing controversial stories?
eldar said:
AnotherClarkey said:
I think they need to go the way of the News of the World. They were enabling and complicit in paedophilia.
Haven't the mail group just been sued for printing something they reported.Are they being condemned for both printing and not printing controversial stories?
Tom Logan said:
Randy Winkman said:
There's always the option of asking the police for advice on criminal stuff.
Don't newspapers have lawyers for that?Red Devil said:
From what I've heard (I haven't seen it myself) Neil Wallis's delayed answer was a classic 'rabbit in the headlights' response.
Wouldn't surprise me if Fleet Street was just as complicit as the BBC was about Savile.
One of the Sunday mags let him loose in their 'a day in the life' feature in which he made himself out to be nothing short of a saint, spending most of his life and money on looking after his disabled daughter. Wouldn't surprise me if Fleet Street was just as complicit as the BBC was about Savile.
I watched it, I've always thought he was a reprehensible piece of s
t and this indeed confirmed it.
I guess his MO with most of the papers was to get some kompromat on the senior players there, so he could control them.
We've got some st on Max Clifford, can you take him down?
Err, we'd like to, but this polaroid of the editor balls deep in a hooker would be interesting to his wife. Let's say no more about it, eh?
That's pretty much what happened, yes?
Kudos to those women who stood up to him and did eventually take him down.
t and this indeed confirmed it. I guess his MO with most of the papers was to get some kompromat on the senior players there, so he could control them.
We've got some s
t on Max Clifford, can you take him down?Err, we'd like to, but this polaroid of the editor balls deep in a hooker would be interesting to his wife. Let's say no more about it, eh?
That's pretty much what happened, yes?
Kudos to those women who stood up to him and did eventually take him down.
PurpleTurtle said:
I watched it, I've always thought he was a reprehensible piece of st and this indeed confirmed it.
I guess his MO with most of the papers was to get some kompromat on the senior players there, so he could control them.
We've got some st on Max Clifford, can you take him down?
Err, we'd like to, but this polaroid of the editor balls deep in a hooker would be interesting to his wife. Let's say no more about it, eh?
That's pretty much what happened, yes?
Kudos to those women who stood up to him and did eventually take him down.
Im sure later on he did have 'files' on various people-hence his secret room where he filmed sex acts etc. But initially or mainly I would assume he brought them stories. He represented a lot of people who confided in him (to fix problems) and it's not hard to imagine some things got leaked.t and this indeed confirmed it. I guess his MO with most of the papers was to get some kompromat on the senior players there, so he could control them.
We've got some s
t on Max Clifford, can you take him down?Err, we'd like to, but this polaroid of the editor balls deep in a hooker would be interesting to his wife. Let's say no more about it, eh?
That's pretty much what happened, yes?
Kudos to those women who stood up to him and did eventually take him down.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff