Yet another... recycling plant fire

Yet another... recycling plant fire

Author
Discussion

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
eliot said:
Traveling through birmingham on the train regularly at the moment and I find it somewhat odd that Crown records management (secure records archiving place) is part of the same physical building as a recycling plant. This place:
https://flic.kr/p/UogyB6
Seen from the train a few times, seems nuts!

myvision

1,945 posts

136 months

Saturday 13th May 2017
quotequote all
Not the first time for this one.
http://www.shorpetelegraph.co.uk/fire-crews-on...

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

CoolC

4,216 posts

214 months

Thursday 25th May 2017
quotequote all
It's a couple of days early. It's supposed to start on the Saturday of a bank holiday weekend.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all
Apparantly it was steel on fire
Does that black smoke lok more like oil plastic and rubber to anyone?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-400561...


Pagey

1,372 posts

234 months

Saturday 27th May 2017
quotequote all

It was WEEE Waste



Light Brothers are the main WEEE recycler in Sussex

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wale...

Swansea getting some much needed fresh air.

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Sunday 11th June 2017
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
Fumes not toxic residents assured..............

Greens trashing the environment again.

We are expected to believe a mountain of recycling waste in an uncontrolled burn releases nothing but the smell of lavender and roses, but diesel cars are deadly.

4x4Tyke

6,506 posts

132 months

cossy400

3,161 posts

184 months

Tuesday 18th July 2017
quotequote all
http://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/500-...



Surprised this has nt been posted yet......

Dogwatch

6,226 posts

222 months

Tuesday 18th July 2017
quotequote all
Poor form putting a recycling centre next to a canal. All that water for the fire brigade to use!

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
First one for a little while. Local to me and I pass it on one of my bike ride routes. hehe

http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/update-friday-...

Boosted LS1

21,184 posts

260 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
There was one local to me recently, Derby iirc. Such a blatant scam.

Megaflow

9,399 posts

225 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
First one for a little while. Local to me and I pass it on one of my bike ride routes. hehe

http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news/update-friday-...
Funnily enough I was just about to post that. I could see the smoke at my gym, 16 miles away.

Second time in 5 years...

According to Lincs fire twitter page they scaled it back to 4 appliances only two hours ago.

p4cks

6,908 posts

199 months

Saturday 11th November 2017
quotequote all

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Saturday 9th December 2017
quotequote all
New rules
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-42271132
suspend their licence while they rebuild the place
Should be effective scratchchin

Why dont we just accept that the stuff needs burning?

dromong

689 posts

220 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
New rules
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-42271132
suspend their licence while they rebuild the place
Should be effective scratchchin

Why dont we just accept that the stuff needs burning?
Easy for you to say, trying telling that to someone who lives directly downwind of one who has nasal cancer and has never smoked a cigarette ever, and young children with severe asthma, these people find it hard to accept they have no choice to breathe in smoke foisted upon them day after day after day.

The siting of these toxic burners is often colossally unfair to those who live nearby. As is so often the case profit matters more than peoples health.

The impact of their location needs to be evaluated much more intensively than is currently the case.

spaximus

4,231 posts

253 months

Sunday 10th December 2017
quotequote all
dro said:
saaby93 said:
New rules
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-42271132
suspend their licence while they rebuild the place
Should be effective scratchchin

Why dont we just accept that the stuff needs burning?
Easy for you to say, trying telling that to someone who lives directly downwind of one who has nasal cancer and has never smoked a cigarette ever, and young children with severe asthma, these people find it hard to accept they have no choice to breathe in smoke foisted upon them day after day after day.

The siting of these toxic burners is often colossally unfair to those who live nearby. As is so often the case profit matters more than peoples health.

The impact of their location needs to be evaluated much more intensively than is currently the case.
I may be missing something here, but these fires are not at incinerator sites, they appear to be at sites where they recycle product and mysteriously when full they catch fire.

They are building a new huge incinerator at the side of the M5 near Gloucester to deal with waste and generate electric, seems a good idea to me if all safety and environmental controls are in place. The alternative is landfill which is equally frowned upon by many