Apparently, diversity is white genocide.

Apparently, diversity is white genocide.

Author
Discussion

thehawk

9,335 posts

207 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And if they are using wild terminology such as "White Genocide" - are they referring to all whites or just a narrowly defined band of whites?
Not sure, they probably have approved Pantone colour swatches.

Colonial

13,553 posts

205 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
thehawk said:
ot sure, they probably have approved Pantone colour swatches.
Anything above 7507 U is not acceptable.

Dog Star

16,132 posts

168 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.

thehawk

9,335 posts

207 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Problem is that the shoe fits in most cases. I'd go as far to say that it's their weakest point, many people have sympathy with their policies to some degree, but are just not interested in an organisation that comes across like a bunch of thugs and knckledraggers.

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

164 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Colonial said:
thehawk said:
ot sure, they probably have approved Pantone colour swatches.
Anything above 7507 U is not acceptable.
hehe but are you sure that's true - seem to be a lot of orange white people about.

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Allowing people to hold abhorrent views is part of civillised society. The problem is when they act on these abhorrent views and start hurting individuals - as we are seeing happen in Greece.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Dog Star said:
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Allowing people to hold abhorrent views is part of civillised society. The problem is when they act on these abhorrent views and start hurting individuals - as we are seeing happen in Greece.
Most problems in the eu have been caused by socialists, in a lot of cases people in high up positions actually advocating the fall of western democracy, see baroness Ashton etc. Their abhorrent claims to 'other people's money, and thier tendancy to brand anyone who doesn't agree with thier views as either bigots or racists has fuelled the bnp and the like.

obob

4,193 posts

194 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
Most problems in the eu have been caused by socialists, in a lot of cases people in high up positions actually advocating the fall of western democracy, see baroness Ashton etc. Their abhorrent claims to 'other people's money, and thier tendancy to brand anyone who doesn't agree with thier views as either bigots or racists has fuelled the bnp and the like.
How dare they brand racists racist as in case of the BNP. Anyway the BNP is hardly fuelled, they have gone backwards at a speed of knots. Pretty sure they are socialists too.

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
obob said:
How dare they brand racists racist as in case of the BNP. Anyway the BNP is hardly fuelled, they have gone backwards at a speed of knots. Pretty sure they are socialists too.
Pardon?

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
It's a valid argument to say that political correctness is essentially anti-male, anti-christian, anti-white, etc., because it requires more than equality for the supposedly 'oppressed'. No one can seriously argue otherwise.

I wouldn't go any further than that though.

Rick_1138

3,673 posts

178 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
10 Pence Short said:
Breadvan72 said:
Non! Non! je suis vraiment français, et je demande l'asile politique!
The asylum you seek is most likely not political!
Je Sui napoleon party

Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
Most problems in the eu have been caused by socialists, in a lot of cases people in high up positions actually advocating the fall of western democracy, see baroness Ashton etc. Their abhorrent claims to 'other people's money, and thier tendancy to brand anyone who doesn't agree with thier views as either bigots or racists has fuelled the bnp and the like.
Really? Any links?

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Rick_1138 said:
Je Sui napoleon party
Je sui un Rockstar.

obob

4,193 posts

194 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Pardon?
I have no idea what I was trying to say. I think I was trying to say the BNP have not been fuelled by the anti EU sentiment as they are more irrelevant now then any point of their history.

They are also socialists.

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
At least you were honest.

4v6

1,098 posts

126 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
Theres worse things out there than the bnp (idiots) like unite against fascism for example....more intolerant than the fascists they rail against.

Im wondering why the forced segregation of people is considered ethicly and morally repugnant but the forced integration of people not considered equally so?
Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?

Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.

Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
Theres worse things out there than the bnp (idiots) like unite against fascism for example....more intolerant than the fascists they rail against.
.
Doesn't that depend on whether or not you're a fascist?

BNP don't like black/asian people. UAF don't like fascists. If it comes down to a straight choice between one or the other I know which camp I'm in.

deeen

6,080 posts

245 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
4v6 said:
Im wondering why the forced segregation of people is considered ethicly and morally repugnant but the forced integration of people not considered equally so?
Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?

Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.
Because "race" is irrelevant, we're all descended from the same tribe who walked out of Africa.

The problem is the word "diversity"... it's too vague. Diversity of what? Hair colour? Preferred driven wheels?Diversity of races is irrelevant, diversity of beliefs may not be.

einsign

5,494 posts

246 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
deeen said:
Because "race" is irrelevant, we're all descended from the same tribe who walked out of Africa.
Irrelevant, who says so, is there a rulebook that states we should ignore parts of our evolution?

deeen

6,080 posts

245 months

Monday 20th January 2014
quotequote all
einsign said:
deeen said:
Because "race" is irrelevant, we're all descended from the same tribe who walked out of Africa.
Irrelevant, who says so, is there a rulebook that states we should ignore parts of our evolution?
Because we're all human.