Apparently, diversity is white genocide.
Discussion
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Dog Star said:
I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Problem is that the shoe fits in most cases. I'd go as far to say that it's their weakest point, many people have sympathy with their policies to some degree, but are just not interested in an organisation that comes across like a bunch of thugs and knckledraggers.Dog Star said:
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Allowing people to hold abhorrent views is part of civillised society. The problem is when they act on these abhorrent views and start hurting individuals - as we are seeing happen in Greece.Eric Mc said:
Dog Star said:
I respect the right of the BNP to hold their views as much as any other legally permitted organisation. I never understand the bile that's directed their way from people inferring that they're "thickos" or "knuckledraggers" etc. They're people who hold a viewpoint that doesn't agree with other peoples. Get over it.
Allowing people to hold abhorrent views is part of civillised society. The problem is when they act on these abhorrent views and start hurting individuals - as we are seeing happen in Greece.markcoznottz said:
Most problems in the eu have been caused by socialists, in a lot of cases people in high up positions actually advocating the fall of western democracy, see baroness Ashton etc. Their abhorrent claims to 'other people's money, and thier tendancy to brand anyone who doesn't agree with thier views as either bigots or racists has fuelled the bnp and the like.
How dare they brand racists racist as in case of the BNP. Anyway the BNP is hardly fuelled, they have gone backwards at a speed of knots. Pretty sure they are socialists too.markcoznottz said:
Most problems in the eu have been caused by socialists, in a lot of cases people in high up positions actually advocating the fall of western democracy, see baroness Ashton etc. Their abhorrent claims to 'other people's money, and thier tendancy to brand anyone who doesn't agree with thier views as either bigots or racists has fuelled the bnp and the like.
Really? Any links? Theres worse things out there than the bnp (idiots) like unite against fascism for example....more intolerant than the fascists they rail against.
Im wondering why the forced segregation of people is considered ethicly and morally repugnant but the forced integration of people not considered equally so?
Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?
Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.
Im wondering why the forced segregation of people is considered ethicly and morally repugnant but the forced integration of people not considered equally so?
Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?
Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.
4v6 said:
Theres worse things out there than the bnp (idiots) like unite against fascism for example....more intolerant than the fascists they rail against.
.
Doesn't that depend on whether or not you're a fascist?.
BNP don't like black/asian people. UAF don't like fascists. If it comes down to a straight choice between one or the other I know which camp I'm in.
4v6 said:
Im wondering why the forced segregation of people is considered ethicly and morally repugnant but the forced integration of people not considered equally so?
Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?
Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.
Because "race" is irrelevant, we're all descended from the same tribe who walked out of Africa.Who stands up for the rights of those that dont want to be integral with a diverse society?
And why should they have to be?
If people of whatever race decided to set up their own country purely for their own race would that be as wrong as forcing them to live with people they simply dont wish to live with?
Oh, and dont shoot the questioner.
The problem is the word "diversity"... it's too vague. Diversity of what? Hair colour? Preferred driven wheels?Diversity of races is irrelevant, diversity of beliefs may not be.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff