Katie Hopkins offensive tweets

[Evanivitch]

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

danllama said:

Can someone explain what the issue is with applying a final solution to islamic terrorists?

Because that isn't what she said.

Indeed. She didn't say who she was referring to. But the tweet came within a discussion about Islamic terrorism. So the generous interpretation is to say that's who she was referring to.

I agree in isolation, but you could also look at her wider tweets and articles and see she takes great issue with Muslims, not just limited to Daesh.

[98elise]

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Mr2Mike said:

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Scientifically / genetically no. Legally, yes.

Is that actually true? Seems ridiculous to suggest that someone could change their race.

Under UK law, discriminating against Muslims, Jews or whatever would be classed as racism. But of course a belief system isn't actually a race. You get black Jews in Africa and blond Jews in Sweden. They are clearly not the same race.

Surely it depends on what race they identify with?

[TwigtheWonderkid]

Evanivitch said:

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

danllama said:

Can someone explain what the issue is with applying a final solution to islamic terrorists?

Because that isn't what she said.

Indeed. She didn't say who she was referring to. But the tweet came within a discussion about Islamic terrorism. So the generous interpretation is to say that's who she was referring to.

I agree in isolation, but you could also look at her wider tweets and articles and see she takes great issue with Muslims, not just limited to Daesh.

Lots of people dislike Muslims, Jews, gays, etc. But there's a bit of a stretch between disliking a group and wanting to carry out a policy of genocide upon them.

[Evanivitch]

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

danllama said:

Can someone explain what the issue is with applying a final solution to islamic terrorists?

Because that isn't what she said.

Indeed. She didn't say who she was referring to. But the tweet came within a discussion about Islamic terrorism. So the generous interpretation is to say that's who she was referring to.

I agree in isolation, but you could also look at her wider tweets and articles and see she takes great issue with Muslims, not just limited to Daesh.

Lots of people dislike Muslims, Jews, gays, etc. But there's a bit of a stretch between disliking a group and wanting to carry out a policy of genocide upon them.

It's not much of a stretch when post "final solution".

Personally, I think she's lucky. I didn't agree with Liam Stacey's conviction (and I knew he was a prick before that night), but he got a lot worse punishment for some tweets.

[TwigtheWonderkid]

Evanivitch said:

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

TwigtheWonderkid said:

Evanivitch said:

danllama said:

Can someone explain what the issue is with applying a final solution to islamic terrorists?

Because that isn't what she said.

Indeed. She didn't say who she was referring to. But the tweet came within a discussion about Islamic terrorism. So the generous interpretation is to say that's who she was referring to.

I agree in isolation, but you could also look at her wider tweets and articles and see she takes great issue with Muslims, not just limited to Daesh.

Lots of people dislike Muslims, Jews, gays, etc. But there's a bit of a stretch between disliking a group and wanting to carry out a policy of genocide upon them.

It's not much of a stretch when post "final solution".

A final solution for what group though? Islamic terrorists, of Muslims in general?

[Randy Winkman]

TwigtheWonderkid said:

A final solution for what group though? Islamic terrorists, of Muslims in general?

The Nazi Final Solution was about a group in general.

[Mr2Mike]

Evanivitch said:

Because that isn't what she said.

She didn't specify either way, but the topic of conversation was specifically about about Islamic terrorists so why immediately assume she was suggesting that all followers of Islam should be killed?

[Evanivitch]

Mr2Mike said:

She didn't specify either way, but the topic of conversation was specifically about about Islamic terrorists so why immediately assume she was suggesting that all followers of Islam should be killed?

Because as I said before, her wider history of posts have included posts against Islam on the whole. It's not a difficult connection to make, but a connection that has to be implied, hence the mess she's in but not upto her neck in.

[Astacus]

I am guessing, Issac, that you are less than middle aged. No one of my age would not know what the final solution was.

For what it's worth, I think KH is just too knuckle draggingly ignorant to be able to edit her own thoughts before spilling them onto the page

Edited by Astacus on Thursday 1st June 08:32

[jjlynn27]

Astacus said:

I am guessing, Issac, that you are less than middle aged. No one of my age would not know what the final solution was.

For what it's worth, I think KH is just too knuckle draggingly ignorant to be able to edit her own thoughts before spilling them onto the page

Edited by Astacus on Thursday 1st June 08:32

I'd guess the opposite that he's of almost pensionable age.
As for KH, the whole of her persona relies on spouting 'controversial' rubbish, for consumption by serial failures. Just like Farage, she knows who her audience is.

[Eddie Strohacker]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Comprehension snafu there. The full stop indicates the meaning was Farage knows his audience, not Farage is a serial failure as per the previous sentence in that post. Therefore, your response is a bit cringy in context.

P.s. A politician who's tried & failed seven times to gain a seat at Westminster is what in your view?

[Eddie Strohacker]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Excellent contradiction.

[jjlynn27]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

What is my 'listed occupation' telling you (who is 'us' btw, which group do you belong to, or speak for?) about 'my stance' (I'm a southpaw, if that helps) and political leanings?

I'm totally shocked by the fact that someone like you is agreeing with stuff that KH spouts. Like totally.

[audidoody]

Indulge me - how do YOU think we should handle the 23,000 soldiers of Allah in our midst who want to blow us all to hell?

[berlintaxi]

The harridans contract is not being renewed by the Daily Mail, hopefully the poisonous witch will ps off over the Atlantic, seems only Fox want to employ her.

[Tryke3]

audidoody said:

Indulge me - how do YOU think we should handle the 23,000 soldiers of Allah in our midst who want to blow us all to hell?

You are really, really stupid

[Mr2Mike]

Tryke3 said:

You are really, really stupid

Not really a very comprehensive answer to the question is it?

[vonuber]

audidoody said:

Indulge me - how do YOU think we should handle the 23,000 soldiers of Allah in our midst who want to blow us all to hell?

Blimey, how do you sleep at night? You must be terrified.

[Charlie Hoskins]

Mr2Mike said:

Tryke3 said:

You are really, really stupid

Not really a very comprehensive answer to the question is it?

Exactly. The answer to that question will never come from any of them here. They have no answer.

[smifffymoto]

There could be 23000 isis converts ready to kill us in our beds,we don't know.
I have a friend ,he was reasonably senior rank in the Met,as he says,you really have no idea what kind of st goes on tucked away on your middle class estate.If you knew ,you would be concerned.