Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case
Discussion
Dixy said:
Royalty are well payed by us the taxpayer. The taxpayer pays nothing to Royalty, the Crown contracted with the state over the income from the Crown estates.
Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
Does that make him being a Paedo OK? I'd also like to see where you got your figures from. Selling one of his houses would pay off a good chunk of the national debt.Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
Boris Morris said:
Lost soul said:
Is 17 a child?
Legal I think so America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
XJ Flyer said:
In this country the age of consent is 16 not 18 with marriage also being legal at that age in Scotland,or in England with parents consent.
America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
They really are filth. Posh paedogeddon approacheth.America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
Throw out the filthy Tories and the royals.
Hello 2015
Edited by MarshPhantom on Friday 2nd January 21:57
This definitely isn't a paedophile case as that would be pre-pubescent
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
This would be a case of Ephebophilia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
HTH
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
This would be a case of Ephebophilia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
HTH
MarshPhantom said:
Dixy said:
Royalty are well payed by us the taxpayer. The taxpayer pays nothing to Royalty, the Crown contracted with the state over the income from the Crown estates.
Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
Does that make him being a Paedo OK? I'd also like to see where you got your figures from. Selling one of his houses would pay off a good chunk of the national debt.Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
XJ Flyer said:
MarshPhantom said:
Dixy said:
Royalty are well payed by us the taxpayer. The taxpayer pays nothing to Royalty, the Crown contracted with the state over the income from the Crown estates.
Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
Does that make him being a Paedo OK? I'd also like to see where you got your figures from. Selling one of his houses would pay off a good chunk of the national debt.Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
MarshPhantom said:
XJ Flyer said:
In this country the age of consent is 16 not 18 with marriage also being legal at that age in Scotland,or in England with parents consent.
America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
They really are filth. Posh paedogeddon approacheth.America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
Throw out the filthy Tories and the royals.
Hello 2015
Edited by MarshPhantom on Friday 2nd January 21:57
ked.www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/teenager-j...
MarshPhantom said:
Because Prince Andrew?
You seem to be ignoring the part where the girl was of the legal age of consent?Here's the part from the Telegraph, I suggest you try reading it slowly, so you can digest the information
Telegraph said:
The unnamed litigant claims she was forced to have "sexual relations" with the Duke at a flat in London, at a Caribbean island in "an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls" and an undisclosed location in New York.
The woman was 17 at the time, which is considered to be a minor in Florida, where the legal papers were filed.
Filed in Florida, where Eppstein had sex with girls who would have been underage in that state.The woman was 17 at the time, which is considered to be a minor in Florida, where the legal papers were filed.
XJ Flyer said:
MarshPhantom said:
XJ Flyer said:
In this country the age of consent is 16 not 18 with marriage also being legal at that age in Scotland,or in England with parents consent.
America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
They really are filth. Posh paedogeddon approacheth.America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
Throw out the filthy Tories and the royals.
Hello 2015
Edited by MarshPhantom on Friday 2nd January 21:57
ked.www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/teenager-j...
ked up to have sex with your wife?MarshPhantom said:
XJ Flyer said:
MarshPhantom said:
Dixy said:
Royalty are well payed by us the taxpayer. The taxpayer pays nothing to Royalty, the Crown contracted with the state over the income from the Crown estates.
Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
Does that make him being a Paedo OK? I'd also like to see where you got your figures from. Selling one of his houses would pay off a good chunk of the national debt.Prince Andrew receives nothing from the state.
MarshPhantom said:
XJ Flyer said:
MarshPhantom said:
XJ Flyer said:
In this country the age of consent is 16 not 18 with marriage also being legal at that age in Scotland,or in England with parents consent.
America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
They really are filth. Posh paedogeddon approacheth.America has some strange age issues which have swung from the extreme of legal marriage at 13,as in the case of Jerry Lee Lewis' marriage to Myra Brown,to what seems like federal law now which effectively makes the age of consent 18 where one party to the relationship is 18 or over.
As for the issue with Andrew that seems like more to do with the strange societal confusion on both sides of the Atlantic concerning anyone considered as being 'too old' to be with someone considered as being 'too young'.Which is probably why,unlike his father,Harry won't be as lucky now in finding a girl of Dianna Spencer's age when she first met Charles when she was 15.
Throw out the filthy Tories and the royals.
Hello 2015
Edited by MarshPhantom on Friday 2nd January 21:57
ked.www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/teenager-j...
ked up to have sex with your wife?www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/she-was-15-i-was-...
MarshPhantom said:
As posted above. If nothing doing why the massive denial by those royals earlier.
"However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue".Which is categorically true, because the girl in question was the legal age of consent in the locations she allegedly met him. what do you propose if not denial? They admit to something he hasn't done?
You seem to be getting confused with the case against Eppstein, who was having sex with underage girls (younger than just 17), in Florida, where it is illegal.
MarshPhantom said:
Oakey said:
MarshPhantom said:
Because Prince Andrew?
You seem to be ignoring the part where the girl was of the legal age.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff