Prince Andrew US civil sexual assault case
Discussion
Stay in Bed Instead said:
yonex said:
I’d love to hear why you’re such a fan?
I think he’s guilty. The lengths the palace are going to, and the cover up generally would indicate so.
Oh I don't know really, perhaps the age old concept of innocent until proved guilty?I think he’s guilty. The lengths the palace are going to, and the cover up generally would indicate so.
Please explain why you feel this woman would have made it all up?
I haven't watched the whole interview, but I have seen the "highlights" and the discussions about the interview on the BBC News. It was stated that his advisors spoke against his doing the interview, but he ignored them. What an idiot!
He came across as insincere and shifty, and seems to have raised more questions than he answered. For instance he claims not to have had a sexual relationship with the 17-year-old, but also claims that he had no recollection of ever having met her. If he has no recollection how can he be sure what he did?
I snorted with disbelief when he said that he was being honourable staying with Epstein. Does he even understand the meaning of the word?
He came across as insincere and shifty, and seems to have raised more questions than he answered. For instance he claims not to have had a sexual relationship with the 17-year-old, but also claims that he had no recollection of ever having met her. If he has no recollection how can he be sure what he did?
I snorted with disbelief when he said that he was being honourable staying with Epstein. Does he even understand the meaning of the word?
Stay in Bed Instead said:
yonex said:
I’d love to hear why you’re such a fan?
I think he’s guilty. The lengths the palace are going to, and the cover up generally would indicate so.
Oh I don't know really, perhaps the age old concept of innocent until proved guilty?I think he’s guilty. The lengths the palace are going to, and the cover up generally would indicate so.
Feel free to stick to the bigoted stance though.
The Court of social media rules.
Gameface said:
I'm absolutely on board with innocent until proven guilty, but would you trust him with your teenage daughter/niece/grandchild?
Absolutely. Innocence is the preserve of the free land. But it doesn’t in any way diminish how he’s acted throughout. That interview was super cringe, if he’d been at a job interview I’d have said he’s a wrongun. But we already know that, because of his actions hanging out with his bff paedo and maxwell. In fact his gurning face waving a love interest off from Epstein’s NY apartment made me sick. Stay in Bed Instead said:
Oh I don't know really, perhaps the age old concept of innocent until proved guilty?
Feel free to stick to the bigoted stance though.
The Court of social media rules.
I'm sure when he got on board the lolita express with a convicted sex offended and arrived on an island where there were lots of underage girls, he would have gone "Well, it's only those who are bigoted who would see anything slightly dodgy about this - you alright, love, fancy a photo?"Feel free to stick to the bigoted stance though.
The Court of social media rules.
Mort7 said:
I haven't watched the whole interview, but I have seen the "highlights" and the discussions about the interview on the BBC News. It was stated that his advisors spoke against his doing the interview, but he ignored them. What an idiot!
Arrogant, entitled, and thick as mince, with a greasy side serving of arrogance and entitlement. Entirely consistent with his reported MO in numerous other situations, but hey, it's probably all a big conspiracy because people are jealous of his towering intellect. His nickname at school reportedly was 'the great I am'.Headline news this morning, what a prize clown when things had started to quiet down, back in the spotlight.
Emily did a great job from the clips I've seen, surprised she managed to keep a straight face.
Stay in Bed Instead said:
Oh I don't know really, perhaps the age old concept of innocent until proved guilty?
Feel free to stick to the bigoted stance though.
The Court of social media rules.
That’s a ridiculous stance given the facts around this story. The excerpts of the interview published thus far only reinforce the view that Andrew is unfit, but it may be that full publication will exonerate him. Quite how you can accuse others of bigotry is beyond me, he maintained close relations with Epstein years after his prosecution, if there’s any bigotry on show I’m afraid you’re the more likely candidate, but let’s wait and see. Feel free to stick to the bigoted stance though.
The Court of social media rules.
TTmonkey said:
Just watched the clip where he is told that the girl says they had sex in Belgravia flat and he just says he has no recollection of meeting this lady.
I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
May be I am getting this wrong but if the sex took place in a Belgravia flat when she was 17 years old then what exactly is the problem?I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
Vanden Saab said:
TTmonkey said:
Just watched the clip where he is told that the girl says they had sex in Belgravia flat and he just says he has no recollection of meeting this lady.
I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
May be I am getting this wrong but if the sex took place in a Belgravia flat when she was 17 years old then what exactly is the problem?I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
Andrew could be telling the truth, of course. It’s entirely possible he may have no recollection of meeting this young woman.
He may have shagged so many underage girls that were procured for him by Epstein and Maxwell that he has no specific memory of this particular girl....
Delightful chap.
He may have shagged so many underage girls that were procured for him by Epstein and Maxwell that he has no specific memory of this particular girl....
Delightful chap.
Vanden Saab said:
TTmonkey said:
Just watched the clip where he is told that the girl says they had sex in Belgravia flat and he just says he has no recollection of meeting this lady.
I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
May be I am getting this wrong but if the sex took place in a Belgravia flat when she was 17 years old then what exactly is the problem?I’m sorry that not how you defend yourself from someone saying that if it’s not true. It’s just not how you deny something happened.
This tv interview is going to damn him in the future.
Badly advised or simply arrogant enough to believe he can bluff his way through the accusations, either way he should keep shtum!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff