Discussion
Mr GrimNasty said:
BBC bias at its best 'Corbyn draws crowds at Glastonbury'.
Yer, not like they weren't already there and didn't have much choice but to listen to his delusional rantings.
There's rather a lot of choice of stuff to do at Glastonbury that doesn't involve standing in front of the pyramid stage.Yer, not like they weren't already there and didn't have much choice but to listen to his delusional rantings.
citizensm1th said:
sidicks said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'm not old nor bitter.Please explain how, unlike some, I've 'lined my pockets at the expense of the following generations'?
Garvin said:
citizensm1th said:
sidicks said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'm not old nor bitter.Please explain how, unlike some, I've 'lined my pockets at the expense of the following generations'?
sidicks said:
Graemsay said:
That's brilliant!citizensm1th said:
well ask him then ffs
This is a forum, for discussion of the many not the few, not for personal individual to individual dialogue. I'm sure he can read and provide an answer, if he has one. Alternatively, I would be interested in others' explanation as well. You interjected on this topic, perhaps you have an explanation?Garvin said:
This is a forum, for discussion of the many not the few, not for personal individual to individual dialogue. I'm sure he can read and provide an answer, if he has one. Alternatively, I would be interested in others' explanation as well. You interjected on this topic, perhaps you have an explanation?
Could do some business, that slogan. Garvin said:
citizensm1th said:
well ask him then ffs
This is a forum, for discussion of the many not the few, not for personal individual to individual dialogue. I'm sure he can read and provide an answer, if he has one. Alternatively, I would be interested in others' explanation as well. You interjected on this topic, perhaps you have an explanation?ummmm No ,
also in a thread you will see multiple conversations going on at the same time
not all on the topic of the thread but of issues surrounding it
over the length of a thread they normally all coalesce back around the original intent of the thread.
do i wish to expand my conversation with sidick to include you? no i dont.
Tryke3 said:
David Davis has just said that he influenced TM to hold elections but its not his fault she lost her majority
And now it begins, st storm of epic proportions for the next 10 years
I watched the interview and yes he did say that but he also pointed so did the cabinet in the room at the time. Also he said that the manifesto and campaign didn't go according to the plan they hoped for. He was remarkably honest and came across pretty will I thought. And now it begins, st storm of epic proportions for the next 10 years
Smollet said:
I watched the interview and yes he did say that but he also pointed so did the cabinet in the room at the time. Also he said that the manifesto and campaign didn't go according to the plan they hoped for. He was remarkably honest and came across pretty will I thought.
In the earlier interview I think I caught him essentially say "I suggested she should call the election but she chose how and who to run the campaign".If true that seems a very fair response.
citizensm1th said:
Garvin said:
citizensm1th said:
well ask him then ffs
This is a forum, for discussion of the many not the few, not for personal individual to individual dialogue. I'm sure he can read and provide an answer, if he has one. Alternatively, I would be interested in others' explanation as well. You interjected on this topic, perhaps you have an explanation?ummmm No ,
also in a thread you will see multiple conversations going on at the same time
not all on the topic of the thread but of issues surrounding it
over the length of a thread they normally all coalesce back around the original intent of the thread.
do i wish to expand my conversation with sidick to include you? no i dont.
Smollet said:
I watched the interview and yes he did say that but he also pointed so did the cabinet in the room at the time. Also he said that the manifesto and campaign didn't go according to the plan they hoped for. He was remarkably honest and came across pretty will I thought.
There's no point denying it is there? Stevie fking Wonder would have been able to see how terrible their campaign was, you'd be forgiven for thinking that they wanted to lose.FN2TypeR said:
Smollet said:
I watched the interview and yes he did say that but he also pointed so did the cabinet in the room at the time. Also he said that the manifesto and campaign didn't go according to the plan they hoped for. He was remarkably honest and came across pretty will I thought.
There's no point denying it is there? Stevie fking Wonder would have been able to see how terrible their campaign was, you'd be forgiven for thinking that they wanted to lose.anonymous said:
[redacted]
I think most readers can see through this rather pathetic response. You carry on spouting, what is rapidly becoming, an old wives tale without adding any intelligent content or objective justification and I will continue to have my view of the intellectual content of your contributions reinforced.Mr GrimNasty said:
andy_s said:
Corbyns at Glasto, nice easy work. May's in Liverpool for Armed Forces day - bit of a tougher crowd...
BBC bias at its best 'Corbyn draws crowds at Glastonbury'.Yer, not like they weren't already there and didn't have much choice but to listen to his delusional rantings.
What his audience will have failed to appreciate in their varied states of bliss/intoxication/general happy breeziness, is that Corbyn is not the antidote they want to the nasty Brexit-obsessed Tories. He hates the EU for his own reasons and will do nothing to oppose Brexit, but will rather help it along in his own unhelpful way.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff