Can PH solve the missing Honington airman?

Can PH solve the missing Honington airman?

Author
Discussion

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Hainey said:
...
This is not a historic case. It is very much a live one in the here and now.
...
How long did the searches go on for and what sort of money/resource was expended? (Plus, how much deficit/national debt were we carrying at the time...).

crankedup said:
Life is a risk, what do you do to eliminate that risk. Either live life and accept that people do daft things, like motor racing, mountaineering, sky diving, all of those that partake are idiots? Millions of people get drunk, it doesn't make them idiots, although they may act that way.
Not sleeping in bins?

I have a spare spade if you want it and the task is so straightforward.
People sleep in bins all the time! The problem is so prevelant that operatives have been trained to carry out routine inspections of bin interiors before consigning to the bin lorry.
Let's stick to facts.
I have never said the search was easy, nor inexpensive. Please let's not let sarcasm into the thread.

Greendubber

13,206 posts

203 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
Greendubber said:
crankedup said:
Greendubber said:
crankedup said:
Greendubber said:
crankedup said:
eldar said:
crankedup said:
I would suggest the limits could be considered by the paying members of public suggest the time has come to stop the search. Let's not forget that these Police are getting paid wherever they may be spending the day at work.
As I have already mentioned, the police owe the family especially after announcing that they truly believed that Corrie would be found in the landfill.
The limits have been assessed by the voting members of the public - indirectly, certainly, via the electoral process. I don't see how one particular case should be given special treatment, possibly at the expense of other, equally deserving cases.

The family is lobbying, as is their unquestioned right, that they deserve an unlimited budget to continue the search. Others have the right to express an opinion that an such a budget is not justifiable. Someone has to decide when to stop searching.
Somebody has decided to stop the search, the outcome is that solely due to Police incompetance they have thus wasted a million pounds with zero benefit
Compounding this they assured the family they would find Corries remains.
They need to continue the search and fulfill thier obligations to the family, even though they are ONLY moral obligations.
Who decided that this case have been afforded 'special treatment' as you put it?
Where do you draw the line if no body is found and no further lines of enquiry are identified?

Search every square inch of the entire county on the off chance? Never going to happen
Have you read the Police reports or followed the case?
The Police have consistently announced publicly that Corries body is in landfill site. They have identified the area of the site and found waste that confirms the correct dateline and locations.
It's not a case of not knowing where the body is, by Police own announcements, they are searching the correct area, again Police confirmations and announcements. The search call off is solely due to financial implication, which given the incompetence of the police throughout have only themselves to blame.
Yes I have.

Did they give 100% assurance he was there?

Just because they suspected him to be there does not mean he is.
Not sure if you want me to quote thier words, however the Police did appear on local BBC television and announce that they are confident that Corries body is in the landfill. Suspicion that he is in landfill was never suggested, which is why the Police are taking such criticism over this case. They were confident of finding his body.
Confident is no guarantee though is it? Look at when someone commits a serious crime, the police say they are confident they will track down the offender's but it doesn't always happen.

They were confident his body could have been there so searched the site and he's not there, who's fault is that?

Either he has risen from the dead and walked off from the landfill or he wasn't there in the first place. There's no crystal ball with missing persons searches.
Oh please! you do sound like the officer in charge now searching for the inevitable excuses. If you had any idea of the history of this case you would not be choosing your field of debate.
Apart from your semantics we have some moral responsibility to the family, having built up thier hopes.
Excuses? Reality more like.

You can't change the fact he is not there. Based on the information they were confident he might be there, that is not an assurance is it?

With no further lines of enquiry, no proof of life (banks being used, sightings) then they have no alternative than the file it pending anything else coming to light.

danllama

5,728 posts

142 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Based on the incompetence seen of the police so far, it wouldn't surprise me if he is there but they've "looked" and didn't find him.

He could well be mashed up in the lorry.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
danllama said:
Based on the incompetence seen of the police so far, it wouldn't surprise me if he is there but they've "looked" and didn't find him.

He could well be mashed up in the lorry.
He would almost without doubt have been crushed by the lorry mechanism. However his body or remains should be easily identifiable. The Police are taking. financial decision to stop looking for his body, the decision is not based upon likelihood or otherwise of positive identification of remains
This represents a disgusting betrayal of the family imo

Hainey

4,381 posts

200 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Willhire89 said:
Hainey said:
Stawman arguments based upon historic cases that unless we have a time machine cannot be changed. You deride from your position by pushing that angle.

This is not a historic case. It is very much a live one in the here and now.

I note however you also seem to have issues with Corries personal conduct, is that whats influencing your viewpoint? Do you not feel he is 'worthy' of not being left to rot amongst societies waste instead of being given a burial for the benefit of his family amd child?
No - this now an historic case just like Claudia Lawrence and only should be active again if something new comes up to investigate. He has been missing ten months is not with the waste of the right period.

You have no more idea if he is 'being left to rot amongst societies waste' than I do
Sorry, no thats innacurate. This still has active officers assigned so it very much is a live case and not a historic one. Right now its the sole day job of detectives to solve the disappearance of this man.

That is not the case with Lamplugh etc.

Given the shocking gaps in Police procedure literally from day one I think there is justification for the removal of the team involved and a new one assigned that can start again from first principles.

I ask myself how I would feel were it my son involved and my response is a mixture of anger, cheated, lied to and patronised by the very 'professionals' we are asked to trust unquestioningly in our society.

Greendubber

13,206 posts

203 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.
So what's the alternative as they have clearly searched the area he would likely to have been in with a negative result.

What next?

Hainey

4,381 posts

200 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
crankedup said:
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.
So what's the alternative as they have clearly searched the area he would likely to have been in with a negative result.

What next?
I thought the same until I read up on it. They have searched less than a third of the overal landfill site and to no great depth, all the while ignoring those who work there that have shown with the machinery involved in flattening and moving the debris, he could literally be anywhere. They could have searched over tbe top of his bidy at this point and not have found him due to the shallow search technique.

Thats not Police work. Thats shirking to save a pound.

Greendubber

13,206 posts

203 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Hainey said:
Greendubber said:
crankedup said:
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.
So what's the alternative as they have clearly searched the area he would likely to have been in with a negative result.

What next?
I thought the same until I read up on it. They have searched less than a third of the overal landfill site and to no great depth, all the while ignoring those who work there that have shown with the machinery involved in flattening and moving the debris, he could literally be anywhere. They could have searched over tbe top of his bidy at this point and not have found him due to the shallow search technique.

Thats not Police work. Thats shirking to save a pound.
How do you know how far down they have searched?

I've seen ground penetrating radar used on landfill sites and cadaver dogs as well as physical searching, what techniques have they used here?

ClaphamGT3

11,300 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.
All of that may very well be true but there comes a point when the Police have to say enough is enough; there is only so much money and so much man power - hard as it is for the family,mit can't all be consumed searching for one person's body

sugerbear

4,032 posts

158 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
coyft said:
It really has been a pathetic effort by the Suffolk police, from start to finish.
In whose opinion?

Murph7355

37,711 posts

256 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
coyft said:
Isn't that obvious?
crankedup and hainey's?

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
coyft said:
Isn't that obvious?
crankedup and hainey's?
Definitely!

Need to add that over 20,000 signatures have been added to the online petition asking for Police to reconsider decision.

Corries dad blockaded the landfill entrance with his motor home today. He is prepared to up the anti.
Meanwhile the mother is meeting Ploice this evening and will explore other actions such as military involvement to assist manpower on site.


crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
crankedup said:
No persons can say positively Corries body is not in the landfill.
All indicators point to the fact that he is almost certainly in the landfill, read the reports.
All indicators that Corrie walked away from the area last seen point to the sound reasoning that he did not leave the site by foot.
The Police must resume the search, Corrie has not simply vanished into thin air. Video evidence tells us that he did not leave the area where the bins were stored.
Investigations tell us that Corrie was in the waste bin.

Stop trying to pretend that he has somehow defied all logic reasoning, video evidence and forensic details as disclosed by Police and walked off into the sunset.
All of that may very well be true but there comes a point when the Police have to say enough is enough; there is only so much money and so much man power - hard as it is for the family,mit can't all be consumed searching for one person's body
That being the case after just one million pounds and 12 weeks, it's akin to third World not 5th wealthiest Country in this World.
This is also a case of public confidence in the Police, can they really be as incompetant as this case displays, seems so. And to think I signed up offering them additional cash this year!!

Murph7355

37,711 posts

256 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
That being the case after just one million pounds and 12 weeks, it's akin to third World not 5th wealthiest Country in this World. ...
Give it a rest. Are you ///ajd all of a sudden smile

How many true third world countries have police forces with 1mGBP available, let alone ones that are prepared to spend it looking for a missing airman suspected of sleeping in a bin after a night out.

It's awful for the family. It must be hellish not knowing his final whereabouts. But the money available isn't infinite, no matter what mistakes may or may not have been.

Maybe the 20,000 signatories could all take a spade to the landfill and start digging. Might be a better way to find out whether he's genuinely there or not.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
crankedup said:
That being the case after just one million pounds and 12 weeks, it's akin to third World not 5th wealthiest Country in this World. ...
Give it a rest. Are you ///ajd all of a sudden smile

How many true third world countries have police forces with 1mGBP available, let alone ones that are prepared to spend it looking for a missing airman suspected of sleeping in a bin after a night out.

It's awful for the family. It must be hellish not knowing his final whereabouts. But the money available isn't infinite, no matter what mistakes may or may not have been.

Maybe the 20,000 signatories could all take a spade to the landfill and start digging. Might be a better way to find out whether he's genuinely there or not.
Why should I 'give it a rest'? because you happen to hold a different opinion ? Simply trying to make a point about money, of course I might have guessed somebody would take it in the literal sense.The money is not a good enough reason to leave this lads body in landfill. The Police are paid for out of Suffolk money, where do you live. For your information plenty of Suffolk volunteers turned out to search for the lad in the early months of the disappearance, I suggest you check your facts before suggesting Suffolk people should help in the search. They have and are. As for the family not knowing Corries whereabouts, once again you show your ignorance on the matter. The family are utterly convinced that thier son is in the landfill.
If all you have to contribute is sarcasm why don't you do some research and contribute something useful and positive.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Hainey said:
Willhire89 said:
Hainey said:
Stawman arguments based upon historic cases that unless we have a time machine cannot be changed. You deride from your position by pushing that angle.

This is not a historic case. It is very much a live one in the here and now.

I note however you also seem to have issues with Corries personal conduct, is that whats influencing your viewpoint? Do you not feel he is 'worthy' of not being left to rot amongst societies waste instead of being given a burial for the benefit of his family amd child?
No - this now an historic case just like Claudia Lawrence and only should be active again if something new comes up to investigate. He has been missing ten months is not with the waste of the right period.

You have no more idea if he is 'being left to rot amongst societies waste' than I do
Sorry, no thats innacurate. This still has active officers assigned so it very much is a live case and not a historic one. Right now its the sole day job of detectives to solve the disappearance of this man.

That is not the case with Lamplugh etc.

Given the shocking gaps in Police procedure literally from day one I think there is justification for the removal of the team involved and a new one assigned that can start again from first principles.

I ask myself how I would feel were it my son involved and my response is a mixture of anger, cheated, lied to and patronised by the very 'professionals' we are asked to trust unquestioningly in our society.
An independent review of the Suffolk Police investigative work on this case has been called in. Suffolk Police are under increasing pressure to recommence the search for Corrie.

Jakg

3,463 posts

168 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
crankedup said:
For other posters concerned about the cost of the search, unless you live within the Suffolk Police boundary of responsibility you do not pay for thier service. I live in Bury st Edmunds and have zero problem with the expenditure related to the search. My trouble is learning about the Police incompetence throughout this whole sorry sad case.
I live in Suffolk so hopefully my opinion is valid.

It's clear that the police are only releasing information to the public as and when it is in the investigations best interests to do - i.e. the dating websites came out after several months, but the police disclosed that they knew from virtually day one. I can only speculate as to the reasons to this.

I can also understand how this stance could be upsetting to outsiders (the family, especially) who feel that they ignoring key information or not acting in the most "obvious" way (based only on the publically available information).

I think that unless you know all the facts of this case - which simply aren't in the public domain (yet) - I don't think it's fair to criticise their choice of action based only some of the picture.

I also think that the amount spent on this investigation is incredible and at this point the odds of him being are alive are infinitesimal. At some point you have to draw a line, but in a major investigation such as this that's always going be to be difficult.

XCP

16,914 posts

228 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
I suspect strongly that Suffolk, being a relatively small force, will get Home Office central funding if the figures being bandied around are anywhere near accurate. So it won't just be the residents of that county who are paying ( if that makes any difference).

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Tuesday 25th July 2017
quotequote all
Jakg said:
crankedup said:
For other posters concerned about the cost of the search, unless you live within the Suffolk Police boundary of responsibility you do not pay for thier service. I live in Bury st Edmunds and have zero problem with the expenditure related to the search. My trouble is learning about the Police incompetence throughout this whole sorry sad case.
I live in Suffolk so hopefully my opinion is valid.

It's clear that the police are only releasing information to the public as and when it is in the investigations best interests to do - i.e. the dating websites came out after several months, but the police disclosed that they knew from virtually day one. I can only speculate as to the reasons to this.

I can also understand how this stance could be upsetting to outsiders (the family, especially) who feel that they ignoring key information or not acting in the most "obvious" way (based only on the publically available information).

I think that unless you know all the facts of this case - which simply aren't in the public domain (yet) - I don't think it's fair to criticise their choice of action based only some of the picture.

I also think that the amount spent on this investigation is incredible and at this point the odds of him being are alive are infinitesimal. At some point you have to draw a line, but in a major investigation such as this that's always going be to be difficult.
I understand what you say but disagree with much of it. The release of the 'personal' information about Corrie was, in my opinion, a much used and deliberate part of the investigation and search. Reasoning is simple, keep the story in the headlines and maximise media exposure.
So far as the financial expenditure, in the context of previous investigations such as the Soham murders, Ipswich murders be interesting to see the expenditure on those investigations. Yes people will say perhaps the murders warrant deeper investigation and larger budgets and that may be so.
For me the key difficulty in accepting the Police action in Corries case is the complete public 'car crash' of the investigation from the outset. Locally, this has caused much derision of the police force and loss of respect of professionalism. The key aspects were missed opportunities
Why did the police ignore the fact that Corrie entered an area and did not leave? video evidence.
Why did they not fully investigate the second most obvious clue, his phone trace?
Why did they seemingly accept the weight of the bin lorry as correct when the phone trace and lack of Corrie on CCTV from the area was compelling?
Why did it take so long for the Police to realise thier apparent mistake?

It may be benifit of hindsight, but living in Bury st Edmunds the talk was 'Corrie is in the landfill'
why can't the Police see that is obvious?
Be interesting to read the independant Police review of Suffolk Police handling of this case. Whichever public confidence in them has been damaged.