Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 4
Discussion
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
Dellingpole is a journalist who doesn't go with the flow. This is Chris Horner https://cei.org/expert/christopher-c-horner
There, I'm your web-b
h. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.
Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
Good grief. Is such a nasty attitude really necessary? There, I'm your web-b
h. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
I searched for for Chris Horner. Top result was a cyclist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Horner
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Christopher+C.+H...
Now repeat after me "my name is Durbster I must try harder"
Even searching in your beloved Google Scholar he comes up second and not a cyclist in sight there
Edited by dickymint on Monday 24th July 21:54
BBC went climate/energy bat-st mental today - was it a special day for some reason?
(1) Scientists scared Greenland is going to be melted by dark algae etc. - no mention of record cold and mass gain.
(2) Met office says we're all going to drown in winter because models - again ignoring it was wetter before, then got drier then wetter, and they are only looking at the latter period so see a false trend - although to be fair to MO they largely ascribe it to natural variation - not the impression the BBC gives really. Again saying recent rainfall unprecedented - ignoring that this has been shown very likely not so.
(3) Some explorer on 5 claiming he couldn't walk to the North Pole like he did before - complete bks. No mention Arctic ice is essentially in a decade long lack of decline, both extent and volume. Maybe there is an enormous polynya and no ice over the N.Pole like seen in 1960s satellite photos!
(4) Some people can all save 1 billion by spending 500 billion or whatever (the latter bit not mentioned) on home generation/batteries/renewables - a completely deranged and delusion proposition - as any serious analysis would show and has shown.
t mental today - was it a special day for some reason?(1) Scientists scared Greenland is going to be melted by dark algae etc. - no mention of record cold and mass gain.
(2) Met office says we're all going to drown in winter because models - again ignoring it was wetter before, then got drier then wetter, and they are only looking at the latter period so see a false trend - although to be fair to MO they largely ascribe it to natural variation - not the impression the BBC gives really. Again saying recent rainfall unprecedented - ignoring that this has been shown very likely not so.
(3) Some explorer on 5 claiming he couldn't walk to the North Pole like he did before - complete b
ks. No mention Arctic ice is essentially in a decade long lack of decline, both extent and volume. Maybe there is an enormous polynya and no ice over the N.Pole like seen in 1960s satellite photos!(4) Some people can all save 1 billion by spending 500 billion or whatever (the latter bit not mentioned) on home generation/batteries/renewables - a completely deranged and delusion proposition - as any serious analysis would show and has shown.
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
Dellingpole is a journalist who doesn't go with the flow. This is Chris Horner https://cei.org/expert/christopher-c-horner
There, I'm your web-bh. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.
Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
Good grief. Is such a nasty attitude really necessary? There, I'm your web-b
h. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
wc98 said:
durbster said:
I'm not that interested in opinions to be honest. This thread has enough of those and look how accurate they are 
i did notice you tend to avoid the actual facts some people post as well. like the fact there are serious issues with the basic metric of the global temperature record due to processing methods.did you ever comment on that little gem from zeke hausfather at berkeley earth i posted recently ?
turbobloke said:
Something to put on the Christmas List in 5 months' time as a stocking filler.
https://payments.ipa.org.au/cctf/
Note: it's the facts, not the faith
Shall we have a whip round, and buy it for Durbster as PH xmas present?https://payments.ipa.org.au/cctf/
Note: it's the facts, not the faith
XM5ER said:
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
Dellingpole is a journalist who doesn't go with the flow. This is Chris Horner https://cei.org/expert/christopher-c-horner
There, I'm your web-bh. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.
Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
Good grief. Is such a nasty attitude really necessary? There, I'm your web-b
h. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
No, I haven't had time to listen yet. What I'm puzzled by is, rather than put any effort into explaining why it's worth anybody's time, you've just hurled a string of abuse at everyone. It's not exactly an attractive way to make a point.
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
Dellingpole is a journalist who doesn't go with the flow. This is Chris Horner https://cei.org/expert/christopher-c-horner
There, I'm your web-bh. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.
Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
Good grief. Is such a nasty attitude really necessary? There, I'm your web-b
h. Perhaps next time you could get off your lazy fat arse and look them up yourself.Have you listened to it? No. Of course you haven't because you're a troll as I have pointed out previously.
No, I haven't had time to listen yet. What I'm puzzled by is, rather than put any effort into explaining why it's worth anybody's time, you've just hurled a string of abuse at everyone. It's not exactly an attractive way to make a point.
kKnuckle.Give over Durbster, your fake hurt is fooling nobody.
Did you watch it?
durbster said:
No, I haven't had time to listen yet.
Says the man who devotes half his life obsessively scratching around, looking for stuff to defeat those who mock his belief.durbster said:
What I'm puzzled by is, rather than put any effort into explaining why it's worth anybody's time...
You've wasted days, arguing about whether it's worth listening, when you could have spent two minutes listening, then deciding for yourself.Spectacular fail, old boy....
durbster said:
It's not exactly an attractive way to make a point.
WTjollyF do you mean by that?Edited by mybrainhurts on Wednesday 26th July 13:15
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
XM5ER said:
durbster said:
XM5ER said:
Sorry, what was it you called me previously? Oh yes, fkKnuckle.
Erm, no I didn't.kKnuckle.And I'm not hurting, just puzzled.
I still think that you are a troll.
So actually you're not "happy"
johnfm said:
Must say the standard of discourse on here is not exactly threatening the Captain of Oxford's debating team.
And your contribution is?I can only assume you've never watched the banter that goes on between college debating teams.
Edited by dickymint on Wednesday 26th July 16:34
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff