45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2
Discussion
grumbledoak said:
rscott said:
Did you actually read the NYT article?
Did you read the Patriot's response to the FNYT tweet about the Patriot's turnout? Clue: it's up there ^^^, or still available on Twitter only with a lot more likes.
grumbledoak said:
hidetheelephants said:
Does anyone actually give a st about how many people turned up for whatever lame press call?
No. The only story here is the attempt at deception.Petty, unnecessary lies. Epic comedy for impartial observers.
rscott said:
Yep - i did. Did you read the NYT article which explained that several of the top players weren't there, but that total numbers including staff were fairly similar?
Yerp.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/sports/-new-eng...
Not sure where the mountain came from.
desolate said:
How many turned up to each event?
It's a dumb comparison - comparing people wanting to be present at the historically significant event of the first (almost) black president in the seat of his political support, with just another boring old white guy in the seat of haters.Still, at least Trump can't possibly be the worst/most disappointing president in the history of the USA because Obama has that one slam-dunked.
The NYT fked this up, but it's vanishing trivial compared to, oh I dunno, how about Trump claiming he had a carrier group - an 'armada' in fact - bearing down on North Korea last week, when in fact they were steaming full ahead in the opposite direction. Now that some lying bullst right there. Just for a change.
Quite a few Pats announced weeks ago that they would not attend. There were fewer players than before and those that didn't go made it clear that they were not going because they didn't want to be seen to endorse the racist misogynist twunt. The exception was the greatest player of all time, Tom Brady, who is clearly just embarrassed at his previous, albeit lukewarm, endorsement of the bigoted asshole.
Trump on the Paris shootings:
"Again, it's happening, it seems. I just saw it as I was walking in, so that's a terrible thing. And that's a very, very terrible thing that's going on in the world today. But it looks like another terrorist attack. And what can you say? It just never ends. We have to be strong and we have to be vigilant, and I've been saying it for a long time."
Swap "terrorist" for "gun" and he could be talking about any recent mass shooting in the US. So why is he so anti gun control in the US?
"Again, it's happening, it seems. I just saw it as I was walking in, so that's a terrible thing. And that's a very, very terrible thing that's going on in the world today. But it looks like another terrorist attack. And what can you say? It just never ends. We have to be strong and we have to be vigilant, and I've been saying it for a long time."
Swap "terrorist" for "gun" and he could be talking about any recent mass shooting in the US. So why is he so anti gun control in the US?
Right - now he's letting Canada have it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQBW-8WFfDI
How to lose friends and NOT influence people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQBW-8WFfDI
How to lose friends and NOT influence people.
Russia Truth update:
CIA manhunt for internal leaker.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-20/fbi-admit...
And the corresponding fake news link for the Truther set:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-fbi-on-manhunt-for...
CIA manhunt for internal leaker.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-20/fbi-admit...
And the corresponding fake news link for the Truther set:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cia-fbi-on-manhunt-for...
scherzkeks said:
jmorgan said:
Assange is in the news again with possible new charges for being naughty.
Being naughty = exposing the US war machine, spy state, and unprecedented levels of corruption in the Clinton campaign.Go get him, progressives!
Not curious as to why Assange only dished dirt on Clinton?
jmorgan said:
scherzkeks said:
jmorgan said:
Assange is in the news again with possible new charges for being naughty.
Being naughty = exposing the US war machine, spy state, and unprecedented levels of corruption in the Clinton campaign.Go get him, progressives!
Not curious as to why Assange only dished dirt on Clinton?
Trump was never a politician beforehand. The Russia Truth conspiracy/Hilter/racist nonsense plays to this as well. I suspect the DNC had virtually nothing to work with.
scherzkeks said:
Not really. I think it likely came down to what they had available, which was troves of information on HRC, potentially from Seth Rich.
Trump was never a politician beforehand. The Russia Truth conspiracy/Hilter/racist nonsense plays to this as well. I suspect the DNC had virtually nothing to work with.
Keep bleating that line. Who added the h dude?Trump was never a politician beforehand. The Russia Truth conspiracy/Hilter/racist nonsense plays to this as well. I suspect the DNC had virtually nothing to work with.
Jury is still out, more keeps appearing. My money is on the president, not being the politician as you say, and hashing it. Evidence is pointing that way, whilst not confirmed. Yet.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff