45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

[Eric Mc]

It's all getting a bit tedious. As I said before, Scherzkek's debating tactics consist of talking in clichés, calling those who he doesn't agree with names and posting links to web sites that support his weird views.

I would suggest the best way to handle his posts is simply to ignore them, as they add nothing concrete or original to the discussion.

[London424]

jjlynn27 said:

scherzkeks said:

Another blow to Russia Truthers.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/ch...

Must be hard being so gullible.

You are like one of those damaged people wearing 'the end is nigh' sandwich boards.

Play the ball not the man...come on now.

What do you make of the article/court case?

[Disastrous]

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...

>cringe<

[XM5ER]

desolate said:

unrepentant said:

Mark 8th May in your diaries. Expect a huge distraction, possibly a military incident to take place to avert attention from what's happening on the Hill.

A clue?

He doesn't have one. His comments about Tony Blair expose his insanity perfectly.

[London424]

Disastrous said:

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...

>cringe<

Possibly, but personal insults don't take the discussion forward do they?

[KrissKross]

AW111 said:

Trump is used to ordering people to do things, and being pres. doesn't work like that.

So pretty much any leader is always just a puppet, with others who are really in charge pulling the strings.

Similar to voting for a party in the UK but all the laws and rules being made in the EU by people who have never been voted for.

In other words democracy doesn't really exist?

[Halb]

Last Week Tonight had a nice piece on Ivanka.

[Countdown]

boxxob said:

Eric Mc said:

It's all getting a bit tedious. As I said before, Scherzkek's debating tactics consist of talking in clichés, calling those who he doesn't agree with names and posting links to web sites that support his weird views.

I would suggest the best way to handle his posts is simply to ignore them, as they add nothing concrete or original to the discussion.

yet, you don't bat an eyelid when it is going the other way, and the vast majority of the 'traffic' is.

That's possibly because most sane people can see Trump for what he really is....his core support are beginning to see it as well.

[Eric Mc]

boxxob said:

Eric Mc said:

It's all getting a bit tedious. As I said before, Scherzkek's debating tactics consist of talking in clichés, calling those who he doesn't agree with names and posting links to web sites that support his weird views.

I would suggest the best way to handle his posts is simply to ignore them, as they add nothing concrete or original to the discussion.

yet, you don't bat an eyelid when it is going the other way, and the vast majority of the 'traffic' is.

You obviously see in peoples' posts what you expect to see.

A few posts ago I was actually standing up for some of Trump's teams.

My concerns are with The Donald himself. I think the team he is gradually pulling together around him is beginning to look a bit more "normal". I do have lots of reservations - but no Administration is perfect.

[anonymous-user]

scherzkeks said:

Another blow to Russia Truthers.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/ch...

Must be hard being so gullible.

Perhaps you should brush up your comprehension skills.

The article says Steele admits *one* charge in his "dossier" is unverified.

Not false. Unverified.

[anonymous-user]

KrissKross said:

AW111 said:

Trump is used to ordering people to do things, and being pres. doesn't work like that.

So pretty much any leader is always just a puppet, with others who are really in charge pulling the strings.

Similar to voting for a party in the UK but all the laws and rules being made in the EU by people who have never been voted for.

In other words democracy doesn't really exist?

That is really quite an impressive tangle of confusion in your head.

[Disastrous]

London424 said:

Disastrous said:

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...

>cringe<

Possibly, but personal insults don't take the discussion forward do they?

Agreed, but it's not a debating society, and sometimes 'playing the ball' is just a waste of time...

[AW111]

KrissKross said:

So pretty much any leader is always just a puppet, with others who are really in charge pulling the strings.

Similar to voting for a party in the UK but all the laws and rules being made in the EU by people who have never been voted for.

In other words democracy doesn't really exist?

Not at all.
In the UK, you also need a majority of MPs to pass laws, as TM found out.
It's how a parliamentary democracy works.

If you want an all-powerful leader making laws by decree, try the North Korean model.

ps Please leave EU bashing for one of the many relevant threads. It has nothing to do with this topic.

[jjlynn27]

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...come on now.

What do you make of the article/court case?

Surprised by the fact that we have significant business dealings with one of the companies mentioned in that article.

[scherzkeks]

"Anne Frank Center" taken over by SJWs, being used for political ends.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/...

[London424]

jjlynn27 said:

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...come on now.

What do you make of the article/court case?

Surprised by the fact that we have significant business dealings with one of the companies mentioned in that article.

So you're the mole/leak?

[AW111]

scherzkeks said:

"Anne Frank Center" taken over by SJWs, being used for political ends.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/...

Does this have anything to do with Trump or the presidency or the US?

It's just another squirrel from the king of nuts.

[jjlynn27]

London424 said:

jjlynn27 said:

London424 said:

Play the ball not the man...come on now.

What do you make of the article/court case?

Surprised by the fact that we have significant business dealings with one of the companies mentioned in that article.

So you're the mole/leak?

You've reached the voicemail of jjlynn27, he's currently busy with the shredder. To hear this message in Russian, please press 2.

[Byker28i]

scherzkeks said:

Another blow to Russia Truthers.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/ch...

Must be hard being so gullible.

Nothing to do with he's been in hiding/keeping a very low profile since the dossier as several people linked to it have been killed. Russians claimed heart attacks on two that had bullets in the head, what's the count now - 9 or 10?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/u...

Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 26th April 11:02

[scherzkeks]

jmorgan said:

scherzkeks said:

Another blow to Russia Truthers.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/ch...

Must be hard being so gullible.

May 18th, that will be interesting. People with real info are interview. Not us amateur sleuths on a forum with no real inside knowledge.

You've coopted the argument that I made many posts ago when responding to one of our resident Russia Truthers.

The overriding point behind many of my posts on this issue is that the Truther set has yet to provide a shred of proof. All we have are allegations of "ties" "hacking" etc. The language used is purposefully vague, ofc.

All of this is conjecture until solid evidence is provided, from verifiable sources.

I suspect it will not be, as it has all the markings of a baseless conspiracy. In other words, politics.

Hillary lost, and this is a strategy being employed to both undermine the current admin. and explain her campaign's ineptitude. It's also a throwback to a painfully embarassing point in our past.

Edited by scherzkeks on Wednesday 26th April 11:03