45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2
Discussion
RobDickinson said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40004300President Donald Trump's fired national security adviser has refused to hand over files to a Senate panel probing alleged Russian political meddling.
Michael Flynn invoked his legal right against self-incrimination, his lawyers told the committee.
But by saying you might self incriminate you are actually incriminating yourself by admitting you might incriminate yourself.
So he's already incriminated himself and so can go ahead and spill the beans. Probably Mexican beans, that have jumped over the wall
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
No - it simply shows that there weren't many positive things for the media to say about his first 100 days in office."That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
I don't recall you getting upset when proof was published that the media incorrectly reported Corbyn's views the majority of the time- http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jere...
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
He didn't say that though, did he.“No politician in history, and I say this with great surety, has been treated worse or more unfairly.”
Yet more narcissistic BS from someone who should be attempting to run his country and stop blaming everyone under the sun because he's now finding the job a bit difficult.
Taffer said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
He didn't say that though, did he.“No politician in history, and I say this with great surety, has been treated worse or more unfairly.”
Yet more narcissistic BS from someone who should be attempting to run his country and stop blaming everyone under the sun because he's now finding the job a bit difficult.
Well, the Emperor Valerian was captured in battle, enslaved, used as a foot-stool, forced to drink molten gold and then skinned and stuffed
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-secu...
Allegations that Trump asked both the director of national intelligence and the director of the NSA to help him push back the FBI investigation..
Allegations that Trump asked both the director of national intelligence and the director of the NSA to help him push back the FBI investigation..
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
And from the actual study (they make a number of other points about the press coverage too): "That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
"Have the mainstream media covered Trump in a fair and balanced way? That question cannot be answered definitively in the absence of an agreed-upon version of “reality” against which to compare Trump’s coverage. Any such assessment would also have to weigh the news media’s preference for the negative, a tendency in place long before Trump became president. Given that tendency, the fact that Trump has received more negative coverage than his predecessor is hardly surprising. The early days of his presidency have been marked by far more missteps and miss-hits, often self-inflicted, than any presidency in memory, perhaps ever."
https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald...
rscott said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-secu...
Allegations that Trump asked both the director of national intelligence and the director of the NSA to help him push back the FBI investigation..
"It's affecting my polls, bigly. My ratings are important as I'm the greatest president ever. These stories are put about bu the fake media, it's all fake news, SAD! Make them stop..."Allegations that Trump asked both the director of national intelligence and the director of the NSA to help him push back the FBI investigation..
Probably
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
So when Trump messes up, Bigly, or says things that just aren't true, If they are reported correctly (and hence are negative) thats wrong?"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
And bless you for using WND as a source
WND (WorldNetDaily) is a politically conservative American news and opinion website and online news aggregator. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories, leading some journalists to label it a far-right fringe website
Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily
Edited by Byker28i on Tuesday 23 May 08:23
Byker28i said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
So when Trump messes up, Bigly, or says things that just aren't true, If they are reported correctly (and hence are negative) thats wrong?"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
And bless you for using WND as a source
WND (WorldNetDaily) is a politically conservative American news and opinion website and online news aggregator. The website is known for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories, leading some journalists to label it a far-right fringe website
Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily
Edited by Byker28i on Tuesday 23 May 08:23
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
Thanks for linking to a "news site" that just tried to get me to install a browser hijack..."That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
Oh and have you actually read the list of 25 "impeachable things"?
nutters said:
Birth certificate
President Obama finally released a birth certificate image after years of questions, but no one was allowed to test its authenticity, other than NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, who claimed she “felt the raised seal” on the actual document.
Questions persisted and Lord Christopher Monckton, a former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called it “plainly a forgery.”
“It appears in layers on the screen in such a way you can remove quite separately each of the individual dates,” Monckton said. “You use Adobe Illustrator and each of the individual dates is in its own separate layer. This thing has been fabricated.”
At a news conference in December 2016, Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that he said proves the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent.
Just wow. Apparently Obama sent his birth certificate round as an Adobe Illustrator file with the layers he used to edit it still intact. Right. Sounds legit President Obama finally released a birth certificate image after years of questions, but no one was allowed to test its authenticity, other than NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, who claimed she “felt the raised seal” on the actual document.
Questions persisted and Lord Christopher Monckton, a former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called it “plainly a forgery.”
“It appears in layers on the screen in such a way you can remove quite separately each of the individual dates,” Monckton said. “You use Adobe Illustrator and each of the individual dates is in its own separate layer. This thing has been fabricated.”
At a news conference in December 2016, Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that he said proves the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent.
Quality news source.... I suggest you increase your standards a little.
BMWBen said:
Just wow. Apparently Obama sent his birth certificate round as an Adobe Illustrator file with the layers he used to edit it still intact. Right. Sounds legit
Quality news source.... I suggest you increase your standards a little.
He is of the highest quality... not.Quality news source.... I suggest you increase your standards a little.
https://www.desmogblog.com/christopher-monckton
BMWBen said:
Mr GrimNasty said:
Harvard Study - backs what Trump said about no president ever being treated do badly.
"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo st stirring.
Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
Thanks for linking to a "news site" that just tried to get me to install a browser hijack..."That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts. Assessing the tone of news coverage, the Harvard researchers found that CNN's Trump coverage was 93 percent negative, and seven percent positive. The researchers found the same numbers for NBC."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harva...
Currently even Trump's worst enemies are backing down from the grounds for impeachment position - the evidence is simply not there - it is all incestuous media/sources/leaks innuendo s
t stirring.Yet the same news outlets never hung Obama out to dry - who arguably did at least 25 'more impeachable' things than Trump.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/25-impeachable-obama-sc...
Oh and have you actually read the list of 25 "impeachable things"?
nutters said:
Birth certificate
President Obama finally released a birth certificate image after years of questions, but no one was allowed to test its authenticity, other than NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, who claimed she “felt the raised seal” on the actual document.
Questions persisted and Lord Christopher Monckton, a former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called it “plainly a forgery.”
“It appears in layers on the screen in such a way you can remove quite separately each of the individual dates,” Monckton said. “You use Adobe Illustrator and each of the individual dates is in its own separate layer. This thing has been fabricated.”
At a news conference in December 2016, Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that he said proves the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent.
Just wow. Apparently Obama sent his birth certificate round as an Adobe Illustrator file with the layers he used to edit it still intact. Right. Sounds legit President Obama finally released a birth certificate image after years of questions, but no one was allowed to test its authenticity, other than NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, who claimed she “felt the raised seal” on the actual document.
Questions persisted and Lord Christopher Monckton, a former policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called it “plainly a forgery.”
“It appears in layers on the screen in such a way you can remove quite separately each of the individual dates,” Monckton said. “You use Adobe Illustrator and each of the individual dates is in its own separate layer. This thing has been fabricated.”
At a news conference in December 2016, Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only law enforcement officer to formally investigate the allegations of fraud, presented evidence that he said proves the image of the birth document posted by the White House was fraudulent.
Quality news source.... I suggest you increase your standards a little.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff