Snap General Election?

[gooner1]

gooner1 said:

gooner1 said:

sidicks said:

gooner1 said:

So if it is generally accepted that "looney righties" have performed similar atrocities,what exactly was the point of the post?

You'll have to ask him,




So you don't understand the point of the post either but thank you conceding the fact.

[HappyMidget]

Interesting view of the current political compass of the parties this general election and a good summary of how this election could actually strengthen Corbyn's leadership within the Labour party even after defeat: https://www.politicalcompass.org/uk2017.

I will be voting Conservative this time round as I believe they are currently the best people to deliver a healthy economy and extract us from the EU in the best manner for the interests of the UK. I do hope though, that in the next 5 years that a party can rise in the right wing libertarian sector as that is where I generally identify with my views; A small government live and let live meritocracy.

Regarding a comment above about the "Extreme Right Wing Nazis" or something similar, even Obama was more right wing than Hitler. The Nazis were predominantly authoritarian rather than economically right wing. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PpMaNQ2WDiU/T7pQGhjQcnI/...

[sidicks]

gooner1 said:

So you don't understand the point of the post either but thank you conceding the fact.

As explained above:

Sidicks said:

I certainly understand what the word 'generally' means. Whether his opinion is accurate or not, I've no idea.

Do you not understand what the word means? Have you tried using Google for an explanation?

Have you thought about asking an adult for help, if you are still struggling?
Maybe they can help you with your quoting too!

[robemcdonald]

sidicks said:

gooner1 said:

So you don't understand the point of the post either but thank you conceding the fact.

As explained above:

Sidicks said:

I certainly understand what the word 'generally' means. Whether his opinion is accurate or not, I've no idea.

Do you not understand what the word means? Have you tried using Google for an explanation?

Have you thought about asking an adult for help, if you are still struggling?
Maybe they can help you with your quoting too!

How about this generally people murdered in a genocide have done so at the hands of an extreme right wing regime.

[sidicks]

robemcdonald said:

How about this generally people murdered in a genocide have done so at the hands of an extreme right wing regime.

Is that your opinion?

Perhaps it would make more sense if you added some punctuation...

Edited by sidicks on Wednesday 24th May 09:58

[Globs]

johnxjsc1985 said:

king arthur said:

Isn't there a certain FTPA stopping her from calling one?

labour have said they would not block calls for a GE.

From page 1 but still interesting, support for Labour is rather low so why did Labour agree?

What this GE does is create a Parliament Free zone for a short period of time this summer, May 3 to June 8 IIRC.

This is the same Parliament that in 2013 stopped our own warmongering which stopping the US invasion of Syria; which is why Syria is not lost to ISIS now - and ISIS is now losing there.

Parliament still opposes intervention in Syria because despite indications to the contrary some of our MPs are normal, sane people: despite our allies Israel, Saudi and Qatar (and their hammer - the US) jumping up and down eager to smash it up if only that nasty Russia would let them.

While Parliament doesn't exist Theresa May can use the Royal Prerogative to take Britain to war in Syria.
I hope this doesn't happen, but it's a disturbing possibility.
In view of this I expect the number of false flags to increase and the clamour of our masters for war to be rising.

[sidicks]

Globs said:

From page 1 but still interesting, support for Labour is rather low so why did Labour agree?

What this GE does is create a Parliament Free zone for a short period of time this summer, May 3 to June 8 IIRC.

This is the same Parliament that in 2013 stopped our own warmongering which stopping the US invasion of Syria; which is why Syria is not lost to ISIS now - and ISIS is now losing there.

Parliament still opposes intervention in Syria because despite indications to the contrary some of our MPs are normal, sane people: despite our allies Israel, Saudi and Qatar (and their hammer - the US) jumping up and down eager to smash it up if only that nasty Russia would let them.

While Parliament doesn't exist Theresa May can use the Royal Prerogative to take Britain to war in Syria.
I hope this doesn't happen, but it's a disturbing possibility.
in view of this I expect the number of false flags to increase and the clamour of our masters for war to be rising.

Can you provide an example?

[Gargamel]

I think most genocide, and I hate to generalise, because Genocide is not quite the same as killing everyone, but mostly it has been either communists or socialists. However I think probably dictators is a better descriptor.


Hitler
Stalin
Pol Pot
Mao
Darfur Genocide


I could go on, but I won't

[gooner1]

sidicks said:

gooner1 said:

So you don't understand the point of the post either but thank you conceding the fact.

As explained above:

Sidicks said:

I certainly understand what the word 'generally' means. Whether his opinion is accurate or not, I've no idea.

Do you not understand what the word means? Have you tried using Google for an explanation?

Have you thought about asking an adult for help, if you are still struggling?
Maybe they can help you with your quoting too!

No need for any help, I'm quite confident that you grasp what I'm conveying. Now off to your wet nurse and enjoy your freed.

[sidicks]

gooner1 said:

No need for any help, I'm quite confident that you grasp what I'm conveying. Now off to your wet nurse and enjoy your freed.

You still seem to be conveying a lack of understanding as to what the OP originally said.

I've explained it and other people now seem to understand. If you're still struggling then that seems to be your problem not mine.

As to the rest of your post, once again you make no sense - if you're going to try to make a petty insult, at least get the spelling correct, otherwise you end up looking even more stupid!

Edited by sidicks on Wednesday 24th May 10:11

[mx-6]

HappyMidget said:

I will be voting Conservative this time round as I believe they are currently the best people to deliver a healthy economy and extract us from the EU in the best manner for the interests of the UK. I do hope though, that in the next 5 years that a party can rise in the right wing libertarian sector as that is where I generally identify with my views; A small government live and let live meritocracy.

I've voted Conservative previously as I'm generally in favour of a fiscally conservative, socially liberal government. But I currently think the Lib Dem's are the best party to deliver this, in particular a healthy economy, primarily because they are opposed to a so called hard brexit which, in my humble opinion, is the biggest economic threat we face.

[robemcdonald]

sidicks said:

robemcdonald said:

How about this generally people murdered in a genocide have done so at the hands of an extreme right wing regime.

Is that your opinion?

Perhaps it would make more sense if you added some punctuation...

Edited by sidicks on Wednesday 24th May 09:58

Grammar? Is that all you've got?

[Rovinghawk]

robemcdonald said:

Grammar? Is that all you've got?

He didn't mention grammar, just punctuation.

[mx-6]

HappyMidget said:

Regarding a comment above about the "Extreme Right Wing Nazis" or something similar, even Obama was more right wing than Hitler. The Nazis were predominantly authoritarian rather than economically right wing. http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PpMaNQ2WDiU/T7pQGhjQcnI/...

Well the very name is an abbreviation of national socialists, and the rhetoric was of socially conservative, economically socialist, at least initially...

[HappyMidget]

mx-6 said:

HappyMidget said:

I will be voting Conservative this time round as I believe they are currently the best people to deliver a healthy economy and extract us from the EU in the best manner for the interests of the UK. I do hope though, that in the next 5 years that a party can rise in the right wing libertarian sector as that is where I generally identify with my views; A small government live and let live meritocracy.

I've voted Conservative previously as I'm generally in favour of a fiscally conservative, socially liberal government. But I currently think the Lib Dem's are the best party to deliver this, in particular a healthy economy, primarily because they are opposed to a so called hard brexit which, in my humble opinion, is the biggest economic threat we face.

Personally I do not think that May actually wants to deliver a hard Brexit, but it must remain an option and as a starting point for the negotiations else the EU will have us over a barrel. I cannot in all honesty support the LibDem position of trying to reverse Brexit either. Plus, as we are actually only voting for a Local MP, our Tory MP is pretty good and has helped my wife out a couple of times now with getting HMRC to behave.

[sidicks]

robemcdonald said:

Grammar? Is that all you've got?

You appear to trying to make a point, yet write something that makes no sense. So why do you bother?

[mx-6]

HappyMidget said:

mx-6 said:

HappyMidget said:

I will be voting Conservative this time round as I believe they are currently the best people to deliver a healthy economy and extract us from the EU in the best manner for the interests of the UK. I do hope though, that in the next 5 years that a party can rise in the right wing libertarian sector as that is where I generally identify with my views; A small government live and let live meritocracy.

I've voted Conservative previously as I'm generally in favour of a fiscally conservative, socially liberal government. But I currently think the Lib Dem's are the best party to deliver this, in particular a healthy economy, primarily because they are opposed to a so called hard brexit which, in my humble opinion, is the biggest economic threat we face.

Personally I do not think that May actually wants to deliver a hard Brexit, but it must remain an option and as a starting point for the negotiations else the EU will have us over a barrel. I cannot in all honesty support the LibDem position of trying to reverse Brexit either. Plus, as we are actually only voting for a Local MP, our Tory MP is pretty good and has helped my wife out a couple of times now with getting HMRC to behave.

That's fair enough. I think it's clear that May is prioritising cutting immigration above retaining being in the single market, both of which I see as economically damaging. What kind of deal we actually get remains to be seen, there is scant detail on what May is really trying to achieve, rightly or wrongly.

My local MP is a also Conservative and in a very safe seat, he has always seemed a decent guy so I won't be disappointed to see him returned, even though I won't be voting for him this time.

[technodup]

mx-6 said:

hard brexit

Hard Brexit was last month. It's now extreme Brexit.

Next month might be super extreme Brexit, it's hard to keep up.

[sidicks]

technodup said:

ard Brexit was last month. It's now extreme Brexit.

Next month might be super extreme Brexit, it's hard to keep up.

It's certainly hard for some to understand what having a strong starting point for negotiation means!

[768]

technodup said:

ard Brexit was last month. It's now extreme Brexit.

Next month might be super extreme Brexit, it's hard to keep up.

I'm hoping it's going to be insane Brexit.

We'll pour our champagne stock into the channel and fire scotch eggs at the continent.