"Stupid Danish blond and her dog upsetting locals"

[Sylvaforever]

https://twitter.com/BasedMonitored/status/85836883...

[CoolHands]

so instead of calling the police she made a video which gets picked up by an anti-muslim channel? Strange.

[///ajd]

It's like BNP or BF propaganda.

I assume the op posted it to expose how awful such "demonising muslims" BNP type videos are.

[Eric Mc]

Or the fact that he can't spell "blonde"?

[Wobbegong]

I've watched it twice but I don't see any mention of muslims apart from the twitter account that picked it up? She only mentions four men attacking her and the dog (followed by others joining in later)

However I don't speak Danish so she could be chatting about her heartbreak at Take That splitting up for all I know!

[TR4man]

Wobbegong said:

her heartbreak at Take That splitting up for all I know!

Not again?

[Wobbegong]

TR4man said:

Wobbegong said:

her heartbreak at Take That splitting up for all I know!

Not again?

They'll never be Take That without Robbie

[pim]

Why is she a stupid Danish women what has her nationality got to do with it.

She was assaulted by a few cowards and it shocked her.Calling the police? They are to busy being busy.

[jjlynn27]

Another moronic post by MojotheInfirm. Completely unexpected.

[carreauchompeur]

Sounds a likely story.

[Wobbegong]

Did a little research and this is from 2014.

Name is Sara Illum Lund-Jense, but the only non-loon news site I could find is

http://nyheder.tv2.dk/krimi/2014-05-22-overfaldet-...

She was out walking her dog and they were attacked by three youths near the lake. They were thrown in but they managed to escape by swimming to the other side.

And they don't mention Muslims either....

[///ajd]

So an old video and nothing to do with muslims

Why did the OP post it then, and is it a reflection on the validity of wider anti-immigrant sentiment?

Perpetuating nonsense stories and newsbites intended to stir up religious resentment is the stuff of Britain First isn't it?

[don'tbesilly]

///ajd said:

So an old video and nothing to do with muslims

Why did the OP post it then, and is it a reflection on the validity of wider anti-immigrant sentiment?

Perpetuating nonsense stories and newsbites intended to stir up religious resentment is the stuff of Britain First isn't it?

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

[jjlynn27]

don'tbesilly said:

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

You are as bright as mojo. Do you have an image of the id cards of the attackers?

The woman herself says, in an interview with the local TV station that she was attacked because of the type of dog that she owns.

[don'tbesilly]

jjlynn27 said:

don'tbesilly said:

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

You are as bright as mojo. Do you have an image of the id cards of the attackers?

The woman herself says, in an interview with the local TV station that she was attacked because of the type of dog that she owns.

You should learn to read what people write and don't rely on people having seen what you have (interview with TV station)

For the benefit of someone who is clearly 'challenged', I did write:

don'tbesilly said:

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

If your turbines were powered by the amount of wind you produced they might be more effective.

[///ajd]

There is no proof it is anything to do with muslims or 'being muslim'.

Spreading links as if there is - this is what the BNP and EDL do.

There is nothing to defend here.

Quite remarkable.

[dandarez]

don'tbesilly said:

jjlynn27 said:

don'tbesilly said:

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

You are as bright as mojo. Do you have an image of the id cards of the attackers?

The woman herself says, in an interview with the local TV station that she was attacked because of the type of dog that she owns.

You should learn to read what people write and don't rely on people having seen what you have (interview with TV station)

For the benefit of someone who is clearly 'challenged', I did write:

don'tbesilly said:

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

If your turbines were powered by the amount of wind you produced they might be more effective.

[Sylvaforever]

dandarez said:

don'tbesilly said:

jjlynn27 said:

don'tbesilly said:

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

You are as bright as mojo. Do you have an image of the id cards of the attackers?

The woman herself says, in an interview with the local TV station that she was attacked because of the type of dog that she owns.

You should learn to read what people write and don't rely on people having seen what you have (interview with TV station)

For the benefit of someone who is clearly 'challenged', I did write:

don'tbesilly said:

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

If your turbines were powered by the amount of wind you produced they might be more effective.

As an EX turbine tech that was doubly satisfying

[rscott]

don'tbesilly said:

///ajd said:

So an old video and nothing to do with muslims

Why did the OP post it then, and is it a reflection on the validity of wider anti-immigrant sentiment?

Perpetuating nonsense stories and newsbites intended to stir up religious resentment is the stuff of Britain First isn't it?

It happened in May 2014 apparently, so yes it's old.

However dependent on where you get the information from will depend on whether there was mention of Muslims or not.

It doesn't take much effort to find a story that links the attack to 4 Somalians.

To state quite categorically that it has nothing to do with Muslims is not wise given that there are conflicting stories out there to be found which may or not be true.

So there's just as much proof that Muslims did it as there is that Jehovah's Witnesses were responsible?

[///ajd]

What is interesting is that this post shows:

- there is material out there aiming to create hatred based on made up or fake news

- this material appears to be readily lapped up and promulgated without question where it reinforces a view

- is it likely this kind if nonsense has been exploited in the UK to support political aims of e.g. UKIP and racist organisations?

- should this lead to deeper questions as to what is right and wrong over the linkage being claimed between immigration and the "well being if the UK" - whatever that means?



PS it is interesting to watch Corbyn - for all his ineptitude - pull in the gullible with his 4 bank holiday guff. Its the left wing equivalent of "blame muslims" to reel in votes. Both are nonsense, both make the case for a centrist future, from somewhere.