Police pull over 'two abrest' cyclists - argument ensues

Police pull over 'two abrest' cyclists - argument ensues

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

53 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
This news story has been doing the rounds over the last few days, can't seem to find it on PH though.

Two cyclists pulled over by the police on a main road for riding two abreast and 'causing other drivers to drive carelessly'.

An argument and various threats then occur between the officer and cyclists, all caught on video of course.

I'm not a cyclist, and very occasionally I get a little irritated by them, but in this case I think they were absolutely 100% in the right, both legally and otherwise.

It's also a good example of a Police officer being annoyed about something and then making up laws/rules in his own head to suit his argument/opinion, which I'm sure we've all been on the receiving end of at some point. I know I have.

Have a watch:

http://www.cyclingweekly.com/videos/watch/watch-cy...

spaximus

4,230 posts

252 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
What got up my nose on this is the cyclist was spoiling for a fight. He says I am going to enjoy this, or words to that effect before the officer had said a word.

They then start trading comments, the cyclist, "I have read the law"

Highway code 66 does say "you should not ride two abreast on narrow or busy roads" , the cyclist said it was not a "B Road". I cannot see a mention of the B road being an issue.

The problem is the Highway code is advisory in many areas so legally I think the cyclist was correct in they were within the law. The policeman was correct in saying that drivers do take risks to pass and perhaps a better idea to ride in single file said nicely might have been better.

To me it was two wrongs, but with helmet cams and attitudes no one looks good in this.

Legacywr

12,016 posts

187 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
They are still a pair of w a n k e r s, legal, or not!

sinbaddio

2,357 posts

175 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
spaximus said:
What got up my nose on this is the cyclist was spoiling for a fight. He says I am going to enjoy this, or words to that effect before the officer had said a word.

They then start trading comments, the cyclist, "I have read the law"

Highway code 66 does say "you should not ride two abreast on narrow or busy roads" , the cyclist said it was not a "B Road". I cannot see a mention of the B road being an issue.

The problem is the Highway code is advisory in many areas so legally I think the cyclist was correct in they were within the law. The policeman was correct in saying that drivers do take risks to pass and perhaps a better idea to ride in single file said nicely might have been better.

To me it was two wrongs, but with helmet cams and attitudes no one looks good in this.
Agree totally. The cyclist was after a barney, and the copper isn't going to back down is he? Only thing I would add is that it looked like a fairly busy road to me, but how do you quantify that?

keith333

370 posts

141 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
What a pair of pricks. They give cyclists such a bad name with that kind of attitude.

TonyG2003

256 posts

91 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Generally riding two abreast makes for a shorter overtake but the overtaking driver has to move over more to the other side of the road to make the move(although you shouldn't be passing anything if someone is coming in the opposite direction). However most drivers don't seem to understand this, expect single file and having seen plenty of "punishment passes" to riders riding two up, we always go single file when riding and having a car come up behind.

....and yes the cyclist here was being unreasonable as was the police officer.

spookly

4,011 posts

94 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
To be honest, I think the cyclists are idiots. They seem to be on a fast and fairly wide road where cars could safely overtake a single cyclist but two abreast would likely cause a holdup. Whether they can legally be a bell end is another thing altogether.
Up in the Mendip hills you see hundreds of cyclists getting in the way in big groups, and as soon as you pass one group you'll find another within a minute or two. They never do anything to let traffic pass. I get that it is a nice place to ride, walk, or drive, but they can be a menace in some areas.
I never get annoyed by a single cyclist, but when they are unnecessarily two abreast, or in a big pack, it's just antisocial.

Fastpedeller

3,847 posts

145 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Had this happen (strangely in Essex) many years ago. Travelling through Chelmsford and 2 abreast in a line of traffic approaching a roundabout - traffic was going so slow a child could have walked quicker. Plod came from behind in jam sandwich (shows how long ago) and asked us to single up over PA system. We singled up (risking him or other motorist driving us left when we got to the roundabout and went straight on). Anyway, 8 miles on we went down a slip rod into quiet country lanes and doubled up to find him stopping us a mile further on (he'd deliberately targetted us.) Similar conversation ensued during which he said "its 2 in the afternoon, and there's motorists out there who've been drinking! " Took all our details including employer! and we took his number (he refused to give other details) for the British Cycling Federation (now BC) which we were members of. Informed BCF the next day who said it was out of order, he was over-zealous and we'd probably never hear again. We didn't but it left a bad taste. About time they pulled the motorists who are unable to overtake cycles (or cars) safely. We see plenty of these poor motorists when we're driving also.

Edited by Fastpedeller on Monday 22 May 19:01

vikingaero

10,256 posts

168 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
spaximus said:
The problem is the Highway code is advisory in many areas so legally I think the cyclist was correct in they were within the law. The policeman was correct in saying that drivers do take risks to pass and perhaps a better idea to ride in single file said nicely might have been better.
This. There's the law and there's militant male cyclists who are never wrong. Morally they could help other motorists but they won't. Because they are cyclists.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

53 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
spaximus said:
What got up my nose on this is the cyclist was spoiling for a fight. He says I am going to enjoy this, or words to that effect before the officer had said a word.
I'm guessing he's like that because he probably has drivers shouting at him on a weekly basis regarding the two-abreast thing, so he knew what was coming.

Plus, he's probably absolutely sick of hearing it.

But I will agree he was spoiling for a fight from the beginning, which isn't helpful.

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
It seems a simple matter of common sense. I found myself today behind some poor wheezing sod cycling up a hill on a single lane road, in the middle of nowhere, with a tailback behind him, and a completely empty wide pavement.

The law says he can ride on the road. Reality suggests many motorists were taking a risk because all that happened was they were pissed off and took risks to floor it and get past in the gaps in anything coming the other way.

Same with the two-abreast mob, whatever the law says it seems common sense that you're more likely to get knocked off your bike if you ride two-abreast so you can talk to your mate.

swisstoni

16,849 posts

278 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
I'm with the policeman on this. Cycling in line is clearly the most considerate way, if not illegal.

spookly

4,011 posts

94 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
spaximus said:
What got up my nose on this is the cyclist was spoiling for a fight. He says I am going to enjoy this, or words to that effect before the officer had said a word.
I'm guessing he's like that because he probably has drivers shouting at him on a weekly basis regarding the two-abreast thing, so he knew what was coming.

Plus, he's probably absolutely sick of hearing it.

But I will agree he was spoiling for a fight from the beginning, which isn't helpful.
Maybe he should listen, and stop bloody doing it.

TheD

3,133 posts

198 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Pair of wkers. Sorry, but they aren't doing their fellow cyclists any favours acting like prats. Up where I stay you get cyclists 3 abreast on B roads, and maybe 12 of them in a pack. I don't mind the guys out on their bikes but a bit of courtesy works two ways.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

53 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Isn't this a case of blame the law rather than the cyclists?

They are obeying the rules as far as I can see, and the officer tries to tell them they aren't.

If we don't want cyclists riding side by side, then the law needs to be changed to preclude this. You can't really get angry at people for sticking to the letter of the law.

grumbledoak

31,499 posts

232 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
"I'm gonna enjoy this!"

What a pair of fkwits. rolleyes


Antony Moxey

8,014 posts

218 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
spookly said:
Up in the Mendip hills you see hundreds of cyclists getting in the way in big groups, and as soon as you pass one group you'll find another within a minute or two. They never do anything to let traffic pass. I get that it is a nice place to ride, walk, or drive, but they can be a menace in some areas.
I never get annoyed by a single cyclist, but when they are unnecessarily two abreast, or in a big pack, it's just antisocial.
So 'hundreds of cyclists' is antisocial? That's a bit ironic isn't it? How about never letting traffic past - has it occured to you that they ARE the traffic? Perhaps it's you who is being antisocial considering them to be a 'menace' that you desperately need to pass?

kambites

67,461 posts

220 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
I'm with the policeman on this. Cycling in line is clearly the most considerate way, if not illegal.
Why? You need a bigger gap to overtake two cyclists who are line-astern than two who are side-by-side.

As a driver, I much prefer pairs of cyclists cycling side-by-side, personally. But then I'm not the sort of driver who overtakes single-file cyclists while there is traffic coming the other way...

Edited by kambites on Monday 22 May 19:17

bitchstewie

50,767 posts

209 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Isn't this a case of blame the law rather than the cyclists?
The law probably says I can legally drive down a motorway at 40mph.

That doesn't necessarily mean it's safe or sensible to do so.

eliot

11,363 posts

253 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Cyclists moan that they want to be given a wide berth when being overtaken - which is fair enough. But when they are two abreast it makes life much more difficult and dangerous for the driver, especially nervous drivers who dont have the confidence to make a quick overtake.
So whilst the may be 'legally' right, all they are doing is antagonising motorists and just reinforcing a perceived stereotype that cyclists hate motorists.