Huge Fire In Block Of Flats

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
saaby93 said:
Where's this interim report?
I thought you weren't demanding anything? wink
It's a fair cop smile

Engineer792

582 posts

86 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
TroubledSoul said:
Jeremy Corbyn and Emma Dent Coad are right there behind them, encouraging them to stick the boot in. What a carry on.
Well, why then don't they do something about it?

All talk and no trousers.

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
I can tell you, after 27 years of being in housing, its a miracle if a tnt has insurance.

The slightest event that occurs, they come after you with ludicrous claim's as they never ever have insurance. Never a single receipt held for the purchase of goods, any financial trace.

1 tale, overheard recently. Claims its our fault a power socket was off. this meant the chest freezer has defrosted. In the hour it was off.

Of course it was rammed to the top with food, as a "big shop" had been done for a birthday party.

we must replace the lot. Receipts ? No, paid for in cash.


However, this awful tragedy is of course nothing like the nonsense our lot come up with.

TroubledSoul

4,599 posts

194 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
Engineer792 said:
Well, why then don't they do something about it?

All talk and no trousers.
Exactly. It's easy to make yourself sound like the solution when you don't have to actually do anything.

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Europa1 said:
saaby93 said:
Where's this interim report?
I thought you weren't demanding anything? wink
It's a fair cop smile
beer

Challo

10,125 posts

155 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
Deptford Draylons said:
David Lammy didn't decide to back down on some of his claims on the Daily Politics today, instead deciding to go full retard.
https://order-order.com/2017/07/20/lammys-baseless-police-cover-up-claim-compares-grenfell-to-hillsborough/#disqus_thread

Just incase people want to watch him make a d*ck of himself as usual.

Apparently he has all the evidence he needs by speaking to some of the survivors.

lowdrag

12,888 posts

213 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
As we get further and further into the minutiae of the fire and responsibility, and more and more into the inevitable greed that has followed, surely, if this was a case of a fire in one flat the tenant would lose out if he/she had not insured the contents. All I can see is that this circumstance multiplies by 124 or whatever the number is. The owners/sub-lessees are responsible for insuring the fabric of the building and the tenant the 47 gold Rolexes he has lost - all of which were bought for cash without receipts of course. I have been burgled twice over the years, kept every receipt and despite the insurers wriggling they paid out for the contents of my wine cellar at current values, not cost price ten years before - because I had proof, both in receipts (which would have been lost in the fire in the case of Grenfell) and with the supplier of the rather good wines, plus the supporting evidence of my bank statements. A little research shows that in principle landlords are not liable for the contents of unfurnished lettings. Someone will prove me wrong though, I suppose.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
A little research shows that in principle landlords are not liable for the contents of unfurnished lettings. Someone will prove me wrong though, I suppose.
Under normal circumstances a landlord is not responsible for the tenants consequential loss (eg loss of contents and/ or temp accommodation costs)

If the fire was found be be as a result of negligence then that person/company or their insurers would be responsible.

It's early days but if the cladding was either unfit or installed incorrectly then whoever is responsible for that could well be on the hook for most of it.

As a high percentage of PI/PL policies won't have sufficiently high limits it could be a bunfight.

Vipers

32,879 posts

228 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
desolate said:
lowdrag said:
A little research shows that in principle landlords are not liable for the contents of unfurnished lettings. Someone will prove me wrong though, I suppose.
Under normal circumstances a landlord is not responsible for the tenants consequential loss (eg loss of contents and/ or temp accommodation costs)

If the fire was found be be as a result of negligence then that person/company or their insurers would be responsible.

It's early days but if the cladding was either unfit or installed incorrectly then whoever is responsible for that could well be on the hook for most of it.

As a high percentage of PI/PL policies won't have sufficiently high limits it could be a bunfight.
Wonder how many tennents lost their 52 inch plasma tellies, iPads and top of the range phones. Guarantee someone will try it on, sadly.

bitchstewie

51,196 posts

210 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
Haven't looked at this thread for a while, put people in the ten floors that haven't been incinerated, wonderful idea.

There was a lady from one of the local nurseries on today talking about how the children have been impacted by this.

Apparently there are four year olds who, if their friends (who are still alive) don't come in one day ask "are they dead?".

Granted I'm sure that can happen to any child who goes through a traumatic event that they don't understand, but something to think about perhaps when making daft suggestions like the one above, doubt the kids are in it for a free PS4 either.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Haven't looked at this thread for a while, put people in the ten floors that haven't been incinerated, wonderful idea.

There was a lady from one of the local nurseries on today talking about how the children have been impacted by this.

Apparently there are four year olds who, if their friends (who are still alive) don't come in one day ask "are they dead?".

Granted I'm sure that can happen to any child who goes through a traumatic event that they don't understand, but something to think about perhaps when making daft suggestions like the one above, doubt the kids are in it for a free PS4 either.
Dont know if you can think back that far but at that age friends come and go and some do die and disappear. Kids seem to be able to accept ias normal and move on. ( although whether this event is normal with the block still standing there looking charred or whether it's like the floods in cornwall which thankfully happened without loss of life but left devastation)
It can be adults over worrying and adding extra concern on the children's behalf - they'll be worrying why the adults are so concerned.
You've only got to look at that council meeting to see the angst raised, but what to do about it? How long will it continue?

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
I was told yesterday by a colleague within housing about the immediate fire.

Don't know if this has been said before, but anyway.

The firemen attended the fridge fire and put it out. The left, assuming the fire was out.

They didn't realise it had caught outside (onto the cladding)- thus this had chance to catch properly and then of course really gain pace.

You'd have to assume kitchen window had blown out and an inspection outside saw no fire ?

apols if been discussed before.

chrisgtx

1,196 posts

210 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
No I have not heard that about the fire, from what I've seen of the fire service they always double check with a heat seeking camera for any hot spots.
And the way everything is trial by Facebook these days if that did happen and came out I'd fully expect the mass thicko mobs to start slating fireman and call them 'murderers' too.

Thankyou4calling

10,602 posts

173 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Dont know if you can think back that far but at that age friends come and go and some do die and disappear. Kids seem to be able to accept ias normal and move on. ( although whether this event is normal with the block still standing there looking charred or whether it's like the floods in cornwall which thankfully happened without loss of life but left devastation)
It can be adults over worrying and adding extra concern on the children's behalf - they'll be worrying why the adults are so concerned.
You've only got to look at that council meeting to see the angst raised, but what to do about it? How long will it continue?
You are right. Children get over things very quickly but parents fuss and worry so much it simply prolongs things, makes it worse.

Look at a divorce, all about the children but in all honestly, they are fine, mental scars are only made worse by parents constantly asking if they are OK.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
austinsmirk said:
I was told yesterday by a colleague within housing about the immediate fire.

Don't know if this has been said before, but anyway.

The firemen attended the fridge fire and put it out. The left, assuming the fire was out.

They didn't realise it had caught outside (onto the cladding)- thus this had chance to catch properly and then of course really gain pace.

You'd have to assume kitchen window had blown out and an inspection outside saw no fire ?

apols if been discussed before.
Thats already been said about 50-100 pages back but no idea how the fire got out.
It seems the fire may have got back in to other flats through open windows too - it was a hot sunny day
Unless there was another fire

Vipers

32,879 posts

228 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
austinsmirk said:
I was told yesterday by a colleague within housing about the immediate fire.

Don't know if this has been said before, but anyway.

The firemen attended the fridge fire and put it out. The left, assuming the fire was out.

They didn't realise it had caught outside (onto the cladding)- thus this had chance to catch properly and then of course really gain pace.

You'd have to assume kitchen window had blown out and an inspection outside saw no fire ?

apols if been discussed before.
Seem to recall reding that in one of the papers. We can assume nothing, but from memory, the fire brigade was of the opinion the fire was out, and was leaving and saw the outside fire.

GloverMart

11,815 posts

215 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
Went past there on the train yesterday, it's an unbelievable sight to those who've only seen it on the telly. Visible for miles around, surely when all the recovery and forensic work has been finished, there is only one real outcome for that building.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
London fire service have reportedly put large sum aside in case of damages over stay in flat advice
Think they need to concentrate on failing to extinguish fire completely first...

Funny how Liarbour and Corbin have gone awfully silent....

Slaav

4,253 posts

210 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
London fire service have reportedly put large sum aside in case of damages over stay in flat advice
Think they need to concentrate on failing to extinguish fire completely first...

Funny how Liarbour and Corbin have gone awfully silent....
It will become such a political hot potato that I fear fro the sanity of JC and McD if the immediately above is true.

Imagine if the LFB actually dropped the ball? (Which I don't think they would have done due to protocols etc.)

If there were substantial blame attributable to the LFB, will JC etc come to the obvious conclusion.....









Tory Cuts!

frown

dickymint

24,319 posts

258 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
As regards fireman failing to spot the secondary fire (IF they did) - In my line of work as a contractor in large factories before we start any work we often have to obtain a "hot works permit" if we're likely to do any welding, grinding etc. part of which is an agreement that the designated "fire watcher" ie. usually me, remains on site for two hours after any hot work has finished. Just wondered what real firemens procedure is?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED