BBC studiously avoiding reporting top name for boys

[Boosted LS1]

Uncle John said:

Not-The-Messiah said:

If you said 20-30 years ago that the top boys name would be Mohammed or how ever you want to spell it. You would have been laughed at and called a racist tinfoil hat idiot. Just as if you said White's in London would be a minority by 2015.

But they have been proven right. And the same or similar people today are predicting and warning if things don't change or even worryingly that's its now to late to change. Things are going to get worse and much worse.

And what do the people who time and time again get it wrong do? They do the exactly the same things and call them racist and stupid.

The white Anglo Saxon Christian culture is now doomed in this country. Replaced by God knows what but its almost certain to lead to secular wars and massive social problems. But that could just be me with my tinfoil hat.

The boy has a point.

Yes he does. They have big families and assimilation takes time. Plenty of time to make lots of mohammeds. Just visit a northern town.

[Meridius]

"Baby names: Olivia top for girls as William makes way for Muhammad"

This article stty title makes it sound like Muhammad has overtaken William as the number one name for boys in the UK, but it isnt, it is 8th.

1. Oliver - 6,623

2. Harry - 5,284

3. George - 5,263

4. Jack - 4,751

5. Jacob - 4,485

6. Noah - 4,305

7. Charlie - 4,190

8. Muhammad - 3,908

9. Thomas - 3,898

10. Oscar - 3,894

Still enough to make some people start frothing at the mouth though isnt it

[Cold]

Surely this just means that the "White Anglo Saxon" families choose a more diverse range of names for their little darlings?

[bearman68]

Meridius said:

"Baby names: Olivia top for girls as William makes way for Muhammad"

This article stty title makes it sound like Muhammad has overtaken William as the number one name for boys in the UK, but it isnt, it is 8th.

1. Oliver - 6,623

2. Harry - 5,284

3. George - 5,263

4. Jack - 4,751

5. Jacob - 4,485

6. Noah - 4,305

7. Charlie - 4,190

8. Muhammad - 3,908

9. Thomas - 3,898

10. Oscar - 3,894

Still enough to make some people start frothing at the mouth though isnt it

Noah,......... really? What were these parents thinking?

[Ari]

bearman68 said:

Noah,......... really? What were these parents thinking?

"Will this rain never stop" maybe..?

[Not-The-Messiah]

Eric Mc said:

The white Anglo-Saxon side of this country was only ever a passing phase anyway. The white Celtic side was here long before those Saxon interlopers - not to mention all those European Italo/Romano/Celts etc.

Those bloody Saxons really ruined this place.

I hate this argument reminds me of this Stuart Lee sketch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw9qN6_eXOg
The Anglo Saxons coming over here doing this and that ha ha ha. For some reason he doesn't mention The brutally murdering, raping and subjugating of the native population. No mention of the thousands of thousands who died in the process. But perhaps that wouldn't be so funny.

[Not-The-Messiah]

Meridius said:

"Baby names: Olivia top for girls as William makes way for Muhammad"

This article stty title makes it sound like Muhammad has overtaken William as the number one name for boys in the UK, but it isnt, it is 8th.

1. Oliver - 6,623

2. Harry - 5,284

3. George - 5,263

4. Jack - 4,751

5. Jacob - 4,485

6. Noah - 4,305

7. Charlie - 4,190

8. Muhammad - 3,908

9. Thomas - 3,898

10. Oscar - 3,894

Still enough to make some people start frothing at the mouth though isnt it

If you include the different spellings of Muhammad such as Mohammad then it is number 1.

[vonuber]

Not-The-Messiah said:

If you include the different spellings of Muhammad such as Mohammad then it is number 1.

God, you are so desperate to make a thing of this aren't you.

[eharding]

I'm surprised that no-one appears to have noticed that there were only two - possibly less - children blessed with the name "Nigel" in 2016 - even "Elvis" was more popular.

Given Farage's intense popularity with a small - but discernable - percentage of the population, this is at first perplexing.....and the conclusion must be that the percentage of the population concerned must either be well beyond child-bearing age, or committed and diligent onanists. Possibly both.

[rscott]

Uncle John said:

Not-The-Messiah said:

If you said 20-30 years ago that the top boys name would be Mohammed or how ever you want to spell it. You would have been laughed at and called a racist tinfoil hat idiot. Just as if you said White's in London would be a minority by 2015.

But they have been proven right. And the same or similar people today are predicting and warning if things don't change or even worryingly that's its now to late to change. Things are going to get worse and much worse.

And what do the people who time and time again get it wrong do? They do the exactly the same things and call them racist and stupid.

The white Anglo Saxon Christian culture is now doomed in this country. Replaced by God knows what but its almost certain to lead to secular wars and massive social problems. But that could just be me with my tinfoil hat.

The boy has a point.

Not a very good one though. 60% of London is white (45% British, 15% other countries). ( https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/census-reveals-... ) .

[Cold]

eharding said:

I'm surprised that no-one appears to have noticed that there were only two - possibly less - children blessed with the name "Nigel" in 2016 - even "Elvis" was more popular.

Given Farage's intense popularity with a small - but discernable - percentage of the population, this is at first perplexing.....and the conclusion must be that the percentage of the population concerned must either be well beyond child-bearing age, or committed and diligent onanists. Possibly both.

It's the name of Monty Don's dog, so I expect no one wanted to name their child after a golden retriever.

[Yipper]

The real scandal here is the large number of people who think Oliver is a nice name. It's such a cringey, twee, desperate middle-class thing.

[Light n Hairy]

isnt there artefact here? Many muslims name their kids Muhammad as a first name as a religious custom, the second name being the 'real' first name i.e Muhammad Rizwan Khan is really Rizwan Khan.

Anyway, not sure why it is a problem to have many cultures in a place, unless the host culture is under some delusion of superiority disguised as a fear of demise. Symptoms of this include a massive sensitivity to being perceived as racist, a lack of belief in the strength of their own culture (disguised as aggressive pride), and a tendency to adopt nationalised alarmist nonsense as a distraction from the fact that their own crappy lives are nothing but their own fault.

[anonymous-user]

rscott said:

Not a very good one though. 60% of London is white (45% British, 15% other countries). ( https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/census-reveals-... ) .

And mo isn't thew top boys name. think about it for a minute mo is top 10 but out is top ten it is 10% of all names will be slightly less when all names included. So is this really the end of the 'Anglo Saxon' race as the other poster put?

[Stuart70]

Ari said:

bearman68 said:

Noah,......... really? What were these parents thinking?

"Will this rain never stop" maybe..?

Trying to avoid that sinking feeling of having chosen a crap name?!...

[e30m3Mark]

Not-The-Messiah said:

Eric Mc said:

The white Anglo-Saxon side of this country was only ever a passing phase anyway. The white Celtic side was here long before those Saxon interlopers - not to mention all those European Italo/Romano/Celts etc.

Those bloody Saxons really ruined this place.

I hate this argument reminds me of this Stuart Lee sketch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw9qN6_eXOg
The Anglo Saxons coming over here doing this and that ha ha ha. For some reason he doesn't mention The brutally murdering, raping and subjugating of the native population. No mention of the thousands of thousands who died in the process. But perhaps that wouldn't be so funny.

It is a comedy sketch though, as opposed to a history lesson, so pretty understandable.


You don't get many boys called Hitler nowadays do you?

[chrispmartha]

Not-The-Messiah said:

Eric Mc said:

The white Anglo-Saxon side of this country was only ever a passing phase anyway. The white Celtic side was here long before those Saxon interlopers - not to mention all those European Italo/Romano/Celts etc.

Those bloody Saxons really ruined this place.

I hate this argument reminds me of this Stuart Lee sketch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw9qN6_eXOg
The Anglo Saxons coming over here doing this and that ha ha ha. For some reason he doesn't mention The brutally murdering, raping and subjugating of the native population. No mention of the thousands of thousands who died in the process. But perhaps that wouldn't be so funny.

Erm, he's a comedian and I think you're missing his point somewhat

[BlackLabel]

Wonder if there were any Toniblers?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonibler

[Eric Mc]

Not-The-Messiah said:

I hate this argument reminds me of this Stuart Lee sketch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw9qN6_eXOg
The Anglo Saxons coming over here doing this and that ha ha ha. For some reason he doesn't mention The brutally murdering, raping and subjugating of the native population. No mention of the thousands of thousands who died in the process. But perhaps that wouldn't be so funny.

And don't forget those murderous Vikings, coming over here, founding cities, opening up trade with other parts of Europe etc.

Keep Britain Celtic.

[ReallyReallyGood]

Possibly related:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/s...

Certain cultures like big families, no matter if it means their life will be miserable. Explains east London.