More money to find missing girl
Discussion
Welshbeef said:
Two of mine were deleted.
Guardian ran two articoed one about penis the other breast and yes it showed pics of both. I flagged its picture content to stop any snowflakes getting concerned.
Anyway point of the article was feel your balls and feel the breasts (check for cancer / lumps). But reason Mods gave was “sexual content” ......say no more
Well yes, it’s up to them to decide what’s acceptable. This can’t be a surprise is it? Guardian ran two articoed one about penis the other breast and yes it showed pics of both. I flagged its picture content to stop any snowflakes getting concerned.
Anyway point of the article was feel your balls and feel the breasts (check for cancer / lumps). But reason Mods gave was “sexual content” ......say no more
I thought you were complaining about the topic of this thread?
Isn’t this all website feedback stuff anyway?
WilliamWoollard said:
George Smiley said:
Is any discussion that they had something to do with it off limits?
Sensible discussion is ok. One sentence posts that purely serve to inflame are not. Ofcourse the PH regime is allowed to dictate what we can and can't talk about.
It's there forum so play by there rules to be fair.
Welshbeef said:
CP12 said:
It wasn't to inflame it was a different point of view.
Ofcourse the PH regime is allowed to dictate what we can and can't talk about.
It's there forum so play by there rules to be fair.
TheirOfcourse the PH regime is allowed to dictate what we can and can't talk about.
It's there forum so play by there rules to be fair.
CP12 said:
Welshbeef said:
Their
Haven't you got a imaginary 944 to be buying? That is if you gain permission to buy it like the imaginary s2000.I’ve not been looking for a spares or repair 944 for 7+ years have I.
S2000 I don’t fit / too tall so I went for the C5 RS6 ran it for a year but that was nearly 5 years ago in Oct
It sounds like that is the last podcast?
The frustration from following this closely is immense.
I felt at the end the Author hinted towards many frustrating experiences too. Not getting responses from SY and other British involvement as well as not being able to disclose all that he has found for legal reasons.
The whole thing is a clusterf
k which stinks of corruption.
Poor little girl.
The frustration from following this closely is immense.
I felt at the end the Author hinted towards many frustrating experiences too. Not getting responses from SY and other British involvement as well as not being able to disclose all that he has found for legal reasons.
The whole thing is a clusterf
k which stinks of corruption. Poor little girl.
Not much new to discuss off that one.
It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
RB Will said:
Not much new to discuss off that one.
It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
Just watched the Netflix summary.It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
I think the point they were making re the blood in both the flat and the car’s case was there was a 50/50 chance it was a family member and not Madeline.. Which wasn’t how the original evidence had been interpreted by the PJ.
Therefore there was a strong likelihood that the blood had nothing to do with the abduction/murder.
As they noted the bonkers part of the PJ argument was that a transportation happened around 21 days after the ‘murder’ (when they rented the hire car) and they somehow kept the body in cold storage for 3 weeks.
Make of that what you will while the world’s media went apes
t.My sense from watching the whole thing is feeling desperately sorry for a family that went on a standard holiday and the world changed forever in a horrible way.
Ridgemont said:
RB Will said:
Not much new to discuss off that one.
It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
Just watched the Netflix summary.It really would help to have this DNA cleared up if possible as it would open or close major lines of enquiry.
I cant remember the details fully.
With the forensics in the apartment was it confirmed with tests on top of the dog alerts that there was blood or similar behind the sofa etc? Just that they couldn't prove whose blood it was?
With them talking in the podcast about the intentions of a possible abductor (child sexual abuse), would you bother taking away a kid that was dead or had a very recent accident, probably crying if conscious and covered in blood (if there was blood there?) None of the "sightings" mention a child in distress or having a hint of severe trauma, like blood on self, blood on clothes.
If there was blood who cleaned it up? Surely if you were the parents and came back and found blood stains and your daughter missing the blood would be an important thing to keep for forensics. I can't imagine an abductor would care to stay around for any longer than needed to get the mop and Dettol out.
I think the point they were making re the blood in both the flat and the car’s case was there was a 50/50 chance it was a family member and not Madeline.. Which wasn’t how the original evidence had been interpreted by the PJ.
Therefore there was a strong likelihood that the blood had nothing to do with the abduction/murder.
As they noted the bonkers part of the PJ argument was that a transportation happened around 21 days after the ‘murder’ (when they rented the hire car) and they somehow kept the body in cold storage for 3 weeks.
Make of that what you will while the world’s media went apes
t.My sense from watching the whole thing is feeling desperately sorry for a family that went on a standard holiday and the world changed forever in a horrible way.
Exige77 said:
They left their three young children alone while they went out for the evening. Those are the main facts. Only themselves to blame.
And e kids with the oldest being just 4 the other 2 not even 1(?). And it was going out to get boozy.
If that had been us Mrs and I would have taken it in turns on the balcony (we don’t do baby sitters in foreign countries and at home it’s family or extremely close friends)
My point kinda was if blood was confirmed there, undetermined whose. Then if it was of McCann origin but not Maddie then was there an excuse given for one of the parents or other kids dropping it? I don’t recall any mention of injury or bleeding from the twins or parents so it had to come from somewhere and someone had to have known about it and cleaned it up
RB Will said:
My point kinda was if blood was confirmed there, undetermined whose. Then if it was of McCann origin but not Maddie then was there an excuse given for one of the parents or other kids dropping it? I don’t recall any mention of injury or bleeding from the twins or parents so it had to come from somewhere and someone had to have known about it and cleaned it up
I stub toes scratch hand little nicks all the time sometimes don’t even notice I’d wager too that from point of disappearance and ongoing my memory of trivial things would likely be utterly non existent. I’d likely not not sleep until I literally pass out from sleep depreciation and then sustain that zombie like awareness as only 1 thing matters
RB Will said:
My point kinda was if blood was confirmed there, undetermined whose. Then if it was of McCann origin but not Maddie then was there an excuse given for one of the parents or other kids dropping it? I don’t recall any mention of injury or bleeding from the twins or parents so it had to come from somewhere and someone had to have known about it and cleaned it up
It wasn’t just blood, the cadaver dogs also indicated in that area of the apartment IIRC. Pretty sure we’d have heard about it if someone had previously died in that apartment.WilliamWoollard said:
It wasn’t just blood, the cadaver dogs also indicated in that area of the apartment IIRC. Pretty sure we’d have heard about it if someone had previously died in that apartment.
Is it 100% that those dogs are right. Did anyone have the video of the dogs searching and bingo or an “officer” who might have been involved (influtrated police departments do happen - see line of duty;) )
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff