Mandalay Bay shooting
Discussion
t conspiracy website and should be treated as such. XslaneyX said:
Just passing on what popped up on my feed this morning. I see it's being discussed on /pol/ as well so might check what their take on it is a bit later..... and no i don't wear not tin foil hat or shapeshift into a reptilian and all that gubbins 
why are you?1. looking at a website that is basically a circle jerk of ignoramuses ideas.
2. not actually reading the bullcrap and then reposting it as newsworthy when it is clearly toilet fodder.
I’ve not been following this thread so apologies if this has been noted in US based media and already dissected.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41564200
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41564200
Does anyone know of any proper studies linking psychiatric drugs with these attacks?
Besides shooting things, one thing Americans seem to do more than any other country is take a vast amount of pills.
There does seem to be evidence for a link but it's confused with the reasons for them taking the medicine in the first place. It wouldn't be a huge surprise to learn that this is another example of the US protecting its companies before its people.
I've had a look this evening and can't find any official studies which seems surprising, but you have to wade through a lot of conspiracy theory loons to find anything so it's slow going and I might have missed something.
Besides shooting things, one thing Americans seem to do more than any other country is take a vast amount of pills.
There does seem to be evidence for a link but it's confused with the reasons for them taking the medicine in the first place. It wouldn't be a huge surprise to learn that this is another example of the US protecting its companies before its people.
I've had a look this evening and can't find any official studies which seems surprising, but you have to wade through a lot of conspiracy theory loons to find anything so it's slow going and I might have missed something.
Some analysis about the 2nd shooter here as clearly the event didn't happen as described.
There's even a huge obelisk in the way of the lone shooter theory.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/10/20/las-vegas...
And an interesting witness report that also contradicts the 'official' story.
Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
There's even a huge obelisk in the way of the lone shooter theory.
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/10/20/las-vegas...
And an interesting witness report that also contradicts the 'official' story.
witness said:
As we were running, we kept changing direction, because it felt like no matter what direction we took, we were being followed. So we ended up running in a weird triangular path. The first place I remember getting to was a parking lot, and I told Casie (who was slightly in front of me) we needed to get under one of the trucks. She turned to me and started her way back to me, and that is when the gunfire got even CLOSER than ever before. It was RIGHT THERE. It was within the parking lot. Everyone around us was panicking once again.
https://www.healthnutnews.com/las-vegas-witness-who-identified-multiple-shooters-found-dead/Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Globs said:
https://www.healthnutnews.com/las-vegas-witness-wh...
Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
I think you've been probed once too often.Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Globs said:
https://www.healthnutnews.com/las-vegas-witness-wh...
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Basic rule of thumb, don't reference websites run by salespeople claiming to have medical knowledge with no credible evidence from science, studies and trials.The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Suggest you read "Bad Science".
Evanivitch said:
Globs said:
https://www.healthnutnews.com/las-vegas-witness-wh...
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Basic rule of thumb, don't reference websites run by salespeople claiming to have medical knowledge with no credible evidence from science, studies and trials.The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
Suggest you read "Bad Science".
And another rule of thumb, don't trust eyewitness reports from people experiencing a deeply traumatic event. Even in the most perfect environment, human memory is a fluid thing, highly malleable and easily influenced when hearing other's statements. It is not a computer or video camera.
Given the stresses involved, there is zero chance of anyone who was actually there remembering the events with any sort of clarity.
Globs said:
https://www.healthnutnews.com/las-vegas-witness-wh...
Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
You've even managed to misinterpret the crackpot conspiracy theorist you've linked to, you complete and utter moron. Upon investigation I have to still conclude that there are no lone gunmen or terrorists, just false flags,
With JFK's documents coming out soon (despite the CIA's bid to keep them secret: some guilt kicking in there) it's interesting to note that a lot of evidence in the Vegas shooting has already been locked down like footage from the casino/hotel, one of the most closely watched places in the world.
The basic rule of thumb appears to be that if the US, UK or EU government say something: assume the opposite is true.
This is what I never get people will try and find anything to disprove something based on pseudo science. i watched the video of the taxi driver who was pretty much beneath the shooter and yes it sounded like 2 shooters, but when you take the context of the tall building and sound bouncing off, all proven acoustic phenomenon.
But someone with too much time on their hands always has to disagree. It was similar to the pentagon 9/11 crash. people said the hole wasn't big enough etc. interestingly they released more photos this year and it was clear it was a jet liner.
But someone with too much time on their hands always has to disagree. It was similar to the pentagon 9/11 crash. people said the hole wasn't big enough etc. interestingly they released more photos this year and it was clear it was a jet liner.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand mass shootings. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of bullet trajectories most of the rounds will go over a typical victim's head.
The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of the suspect, to realise that he's not just funny - he is saying something deep about life.
The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of the suspect, to realise that he's not just funny - he is saying something deep about life.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff