Harvey Weinstein

[Abbott]

I imagine at some point in the 23 years he will know what it feels like to have unwanted sexual advances.

[aaron_2000]

Abbott said:

I imagine at some point in the 23 years he will know what it feels like to have unwanted sexual advances.

Not even a lifer would wanna stick their wick in that overweight, hairy candle.

[PurpleTurtle]

Consecutive sentences, good to see.

I thought he was going to get lots of moderate sentences, but these all to be served concurrently.

What's the US policy on early release? Does he get released on licence at half tariff like in the UK, or will he do every day of those 23yrs?

[Ayahuasca]

PurpleTurtle said:

Consecutive sentences, good to see.

I thought he was going to get lots of moderate sentences, but these all to be served concurrently.

What's the US policy on early release? Does he get released on licence at half tariff like in the UK, or will he do every day of those 23yrs?

Depends if it is a state penitentiary or a federal prison. If federal, there is no parole. Don’t know if his crimes were federal.

[Burwood]

mcelliott said:

Sentenced to 23yrs

Wow. No sympathy though. If he was being sentenced even a decade ago it would be a lot less no doubt.

[Robertj21a]

Lord Marylebone said:

Good.

It’s sending quite a message, which I read as:

Don’t use your power, money and influence to spend decades sexually harassing women.

Quite. Excellent result, and a lengthy sentence to emphasise the point.

[aaron_2000]

PurpleTurtle said:

Consecutive sentences, good to see.

I thought he was going to get lots of moderate sentences, but these all to be served concurrently.

What's the US policy on early release? Does he get released on licence at half tariff like in the UK, or will he do every day of those 23yrs?

He'll probably do a minimum of 20 no matter what. I'd imagine he'll be sent to a federal penitentiary as the crimes he committed were federal crimes, in which case he'll serve every single second of those 23 years.

[anonymous-user]

aaron_2000 said:

He'll probably do a minimum of 20 no matter what. I'd imagine he'll be sent to a federal penitentiary as the crimes he committed were federal crimes, in which case he'll serve every single second of those 23 years.

Not ruling out doing 'an Epstein' - by that meaning dying in his cell, not being killed, of course..

[Silkyskills]

Burwood said:

mcelliott said:

Sentenced to 23yrs

Wow. No sympathy though. If he was being sentenced even a decade ago it would be a lot less no doubt.

Yep, deserves every second of that sentence.

[Gecko1978]

aaron_2000 said:

Abbott said:

I imagine at some point in the 23 years he will know what it feels like to have unwanted sexual advances.

Not even a lifer would wanna stick their wick in that overweight, hairy candle.

Funny first thing I I thoguht was will the fat fk get bummed in the showers. My guess is he is rich and will be protected . Still best get those AB tatts soon as just to be safe

[anonymous-user]

Gecko1978 said:

Funny first thing I I thoguht was will the fat fk get bummed in the showers. My guess is he is rich and will be protected . Still best get those AB tatts soon as just to be safe

Something tells me the Aryan Brotherhood won’t be very welcoming to a Jewish person.

[Alpinestars]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.

There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.

So yes, it seems high to me.

How on earth that some cases couldn’t be proved/he didn’t do, justify a lower sentence for the ones he was found guilty of.

Hope this sends a strong message out to others. This won’t be an isolated case.

[Seventy]

Stay in Bed Instead said:

He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.

What on earth does that actually mean?
Is that like if he was found guilty of less than 50% of his charges he should be exonerated?
Jesus Christ.

[CoolHands]

With all his money why didn’t he go to Mexico or something

[Stan the Bat]

vonuber said:

Stay in Bed Instead said:

He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.

There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.

So yes, it seems high to me.

This puts your comments on Andrew in a new light.

[XCP]

Seventy said:

What on earth does that actually mean?
Is that like if he was found guilty of less than 50% of his charges he should be exonerated?
Jesus Christ.

I think some people, for some reason, seem to like defending perves. Bizarre, but there you are.

[Zirconia]

CoolHands said:

With all his money why didn’t he go to Mexico or something

Hubris.

[anonymous-user]

Zirconia said:

CoolHands said:

With all his money why didn’t he go to Mexico or something

Hubris.

Is that a town near Cancun?

[greygoose]

Stan the Bat said:

vonuber said:

Stay in Bed Instead said:

He was found not guilty of more charges than he was found guilty of.

There was no physical evidence and it was just who the jury believed more.

So yes, it seems high to me.

This puts your comments on Andrew in a new light.

Sex offenders everywhere must be pleased that Stay in Bed Instead will remain their friend and defend them at every turn.

[anonymous-user]

CoolHands said:

With all his money why didn’t he go to Mexico or something

I do wonder this every time someone wealthy turns up to court.

If it was looking like you were bang to rights, potential lengthy sentence, and you had $50-100 Million in the bank, why on earth wouldn’t you just disappear in a musical instrument case like the boss of Nissan?

You could have quite the life in some pleasantly warm non-extradition countries with that kind of cash.