How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 2)
Discussion
Crackie said:
ORD said:
Many Leavers don’t use the Internet much.
Any idea how many of us don't ???Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 16th January 21:46
ORD posts nonsense and when asked to come up with something/anything to back up a nonsense claim he's made, asks someone to to do their own research to back up his nonsense claim.
Only ORD could come up with such nonsense in multiple ways.
ORD said:
Any internet poll will be skewed towards Remain. Many Leavers don’t use the Internet much.
My own best guess is that the wheels have not come off enough yet to really change the mood of the electorate. The public may well go off the cliff before they even see it.
It must be quite an irritant to you ,that Internet voting was notMy own best guess is that the wheels have not come off enough yet to really change the mood of the electorate. The public may well go off the cliff before they even see it.
available for the Referendum.
Such a chore having to drag oneself to a voting station.
gooner1 said:
It must be quite an irritant to you ,that Internet voting was not
available for the Referendum.
Such a chore having to drag oneself to a voting station.
Illiterate post just about makes clear that you’ll respond in a nasty tone even to posts in your favour, as long as they are from a Remainer.available for the Referendum.
Such a chore having to drag oneself to a voting station.
As I said, pack mentality.
don'tbesilly said:
He doesn't have a clue.
ORD posts nonsense and when asked to come up with something/anything to back up a nonsense claim he's made, asks someone to to do their own research to back up his nonsense claim.
Only ORD could come up with such nonsense in multiple ways.
You and I both know that Leavers are on average less frequent users of the internet. So why dispute it? Internet points? Looking cool? Playing up to your little gang of mates?ORD posts nonsense and when asked to come up with something/anything to back up a nonsense claim he's made, asks someone to to do their own research to back up his nonsense claim.
Only ORD could come up with such nonsense in multiple ways.
Depresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with even a touch of intellectual honesty.
hyphen said:
Mail delivers 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5274073/Pr...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5274073/Pr...
He was lucky to escape with his moral superiority intactRidgemont said:
Tony Blair was on the Today programme on R4 last week clearly outlining a path to reversing Brexit via Labour reverse ferreting, and adopting a remain stance, winning a GE then using parliament to overturn both the Brexit bill and request article 50 is allowed to be withdrawn. John Humphries pointed out that civil unrest would be the likely outcome. I don’t think he’s wrong.
I think we can cope with a bunch of "rioting" 60+ types.edit: just noticed that the Mash said the same thing more amusingly
ORD said:
You and I both know that Leavers are on average less frequent users of the internet. So why dispute it? Internet points? Looking cool? Playing up to your little gang of mates?
Depresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with bitter Remainers who still can't understand those who voted to leave
FTFYDepresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with bitter Remainers who still can't understand those who voted to leave
Enjoy your day, I'm off to see the countryside and visit a lovely pub. Hope your keyboard will keep you warm.
ORD said:
You and I both know that Leavers are on average less frequent users of the internet. So why dispute it? Internet points? Looking cool? Playing up to your little gang of mates?
Depresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with even a touch of intellectual honesty.
Is it intellectually honest to make a sweeping statement as you have (in bold) and then refuse to back it up with even a link to a credible source? or is it more intellectually honest to throw a hissy fit and cry "ad hominem!" when challenged politely? Depresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with even a touch of intellectual honesty.
What really is depressing that you are so blind to your own behaviours.
ORD said:
Illiterate post just about makes clear that you’ll respond in a nasty tone even to posts in your favour, as long as they are from a Remainer.
As I said, pack mentality.
Nasty illiterate post?As I said, pack mentality.
I was merely pointing out the fact, that Remainers are less likely
to physically visit a polling station than Leave voters.
ORD said:
don'tbesilly said:
He doesn't have a clue.
ORD posts nonsense and when asked to come up with something/anything to back up a nonsense claim he's made, asks someone to to do their own research to back up his nonsense claim.
Only ORD could come up with such nonsense in multiple ways.
You and I both know that Leavers are on average less frequent users of the internet. So why dispute it? Internet points? Looking cool? Playing up to your little gang of mates?ORD posts nonsense and when asked to come up with something/anything to back up a nonsense claim he's made, asks someone to to do their own research to back up his nonsense claim.
Only ORD could come up with such nonsense in multiple ways.
Depresssing stuff.
Many Leavers on here have completely given up on debating anything with even a touch of intellectual honesty.
I apparently know it? Do I? Why would I know it?
You have a very low opinion of anyone who voted Leave which is evident by your posts,don't tar me with your brush.
I'm not disputing anything, I've asked you to put some evidence forward to support what to date is nothing other than an opinion based on your biased and to date unfounded opinion.
If you're going to make claims, support them or don't make them.
You claim intellectual honesty, but it's clear you don't have what you complain about of others of not having.
barryrs said:
Zod said:
I think we can cope with a bunch of "rioting" 60+ types.
What about the 46% of 25 - 49 year olds and 60+ includes 60% of 50 - 64 year olds.The extremists will find any excuse to smash things up as they always do. It won't matter if they win or lose.
don'tbesilly said:
You've claimed it (leavers are less frequent users of the internet) but want me to prove your opinion on your behalf.
I apparently know it? Do I? Why would I know it?
You have a very low opinion of anyone who voted Leave which is evident by your posts,don't tar me with your brush.
I'm not disputing anything, I've asked you to put some evidence forward to support what to date is nothing other than an opinion based on your biased and to date unfounded opinion.
If you're going to make claims, support them or don't make them.
You claim intellectual honesty, but it's clear you don't have what you complain about of others of not having.
You don't seriously doubt the truth of what I said. You cannot, unless of course you think that older people use the internet as much as younger people.I apparently know it? Do I? Why would I know it?
You have a very low opinion of anyone who voted Leave which is evident by your posts,don't tar me with your brush.
I'm not disputing anything, I've asked you to put some evidence forward to support what to date is nothing other than an opinion based on your biased and to date unfounded opinion.
If you're going to make claims, support them or don't make them.
You claim intellectual honesty, but it's clear you don't have what you complain about of others of not having.
ORD said:
You don't seriously doubt the truth of what I said. You cannot, unless of course you think that older people use the internet as much as younger people.
Just provide a link to a credible source...... And whilst you're at it, you might want to think about how you're defining "older people". I doubt that many 80 year olds staggered down to their polling booths..Digga said:
ORD said:
You and I both know that Leavers are on average less frequent users of the internet.
If you mean we're not being employed to troll it, then yes.Quantity is not equivalent to quality.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff