I've done it again! Renaultsport Clio 172

I've done it again! Renaultsport Clio 172

Author
Discussion

samsul89

Original Poster:

94 posts

96 months

Friday 19th January 2018
quotequote all
After swearing off RS Clios upon selling my 172 Cup in October, unexpectedly I now find myself the owner of a standard 172. It's a 2003 car with 79k miles, FSH, air con, cruise control and xenons (all standard fit). The first two weeks of ownership have highlighted that fun, honest cars can still be had for very little cash in these heady days.

A bit of backstory. I bought a 110k mile 172 Cup last year. Loved it. Loathed it. Sold it. Swore off Clios for the sake of my sanity and my relationship (the girlfriend despised the Cup). I decided to look for something more reliable and had my eye on the EP3 Civic Type R. However, I thought I'd have a sneak peek at the Clio classifieds. You know, just in case.

Up popped this car within half a mile of my house. I HAD to go and view. It was too good, had had too much money spent on it, and was too close not to. Long story short, it took a bit of haggling and a 2 week wait before I picked the car up but I could not be happier with it.

The car is on Toyo Proxes T1Rs and feels pliant and responsive. The only mod to the car is a K-tec stainless exhaust. It is loud. Almost obnoxious from the outside and a bit boomy on a motorway run. On a quiet country road (of which we are lucky to have many in South Wales) the fart-can is a giggle, and the pops and bangs on the overrun add some histrionics. Silly, yes. Juvenile, yes. Fun, you betcha!

Anyway, enough waffle. To the pictures!

|https://thumbsnap.com/l8D505Lx[/url]





[url]


wjb

5,100 posts

130 months

Friday 19th January 2018
quotequote all
Like these OP, especially when kept standard.

Always fancied one, even though I'm way too old!

What did you end up paying? (Ballpark)

Leicester Loyal

4,517 posts

121 months

Friday 19th January 2018
quotequote all
Class. I like how standard it is, looks clean.

I've got a 182 in Silver, can't fault it, best car I've owned so far.

Jaybmw

315 posts

80 months

Friday 19th January 2018
quotequote all
Akways toyed with the idea of swapping my R53 for one of these. Wonder what there like head to head. Better mpg I'd hazard straight away

egor110

16,818 posts

202 months

Friday 19th January 2018
quotequote all
How does it compare to your old 172 cup ?

AndrewGP

1,975 posts

161 months

Saturday 20th January 2018
quotequote all
Looks great, very clean especially with 110k miles.

Loved my old 172, it was a 52 plate car that looked exactly the same as yours. I swapped the wheels for Turinis and kept it 5 years as my daily drive. It was super reliable and not once did it ever let me down. I’m now driving a mint 182 as my daily (after a brief fling with a Civic Type R) and that’s great too. 2 years in now with the 182 with no plans to sell, I absolutely love these cars biggrin

And to the poster above who says they’re too old, I’m 42 in a couple of weeks and care not that I’m driving an R.S. Clio day to day! Get one bought!

Edited by AndrewGP on Saturday 20th January 08:16

samsul89

Original Poster:

94 posts

96 months

Saturday 20th January 2018
quotequote all
wjb said:
Like these OP, especially when kept standard.

Always fancied one, even though I'm way too old!

What did you end up paying? (Ballpark)
As AndrewGP says, there's no such thing as too old! They are affordable and, providing you get a good one, can be trouble free *crosses fingers*.

I paid in the region of a shed and a half, or one very big shed, whichever metric you prefer! I am aware that this is strong money for a 15 year old 172 and I might have paid a bit over the odds but for the sake of a few hundred pounds I wasn't going to argue. Especially so, given that the car was on my doorstep, had had 1800 GBP spent at a Renault main dealer in one service (where just about everything was either refreshed or replaced), and is the cleanest 172 I have seen.

Jaybmw said:
Akways toyed with the idea of swapping my R53 for one of these. Wonder what there like head to head. Better mpg I'd hazard straight away
I always liked the R53 minis. That supercharger whine is an exotic and incongruous sound in a little hatchback. Love it.

The MPG is an interesting one. I got 41 MPG on a 200 mile run to the NEC last weekend, which is a bit lower than the 44 MPG I managed in the Cup. Nevertheless, I would say that's not bad going for a fairly quick run. My commute, however, is 3 miles of stop-start traffic and it drags the average back down to around 27 MPG. So, in normal conditions, I think you should expect low to mid 30s.

egor110 said:
How does it compare to your old 172 cup ?
First off, I have to say that the Cup I had was a decent example but probably hadn't been cared for like this one has, so I may be comparing apples and oranges here. A few comparisons though:

1. The Cup was definitely a bit quicker in a straight line. I would put it in the region of around 5% quicker.

2. The Cup was more planted, probably down to the lowering springs and 100 fewer kilos (apples and oranges?).

3. The Cup looked better - something about the stance, the blue, and the Turinis just worked.

4. This is definitely an unfair comparison but the Cup had a 330mm Momo steering wheel and I swear the feedback was more intense. I actually Googled to see if the 172 and the Cup shared the same steering rack such is the difference in feel (FYI, they do!). I can wholeheartedly recommend a smaller wheel and am considering getting one on this car. Just need to figure out how to re-route the steering mounted controls.

5. This car is more useable. Much more useable. I like to think of myself as a bit of a purist, but I will admit that I have been seduced by the cruise control and air-con. I can munch miles on the way to a good road, then switch the cruise, air-con, and traction off and have a blast. Perfect.

Despite this list seeming to favour the Cup I would say that the 172 has 95% of the performance but 50% more usability, making it a bit of a no-brainer for my purposes (daily duty with the occasional quick run out). If you're after a fast road/track car, though, the Cup is the better choice.

AndrewGP said:
Looks great, very clean especially with 110k miles.

Loved my old 172, it was a 52 plate car that looked exactly the same as yours. I swapped the wheels for Turinis and kept it 5 years as my daily drive. It was super reliable and not once did it ever let me down. I’m now driving a mint 182 as my daily (after a brief fling with a Civic Type R) and that’s great too. 2 years in now with the 182 with no plans to sell, I absolutely love these cars biggrin

And to the poster above who says they’re too old, I’m 42 in a couple of weeks and care not that I’m driving an R.S. Clio day to day! Get one bought!

Edited by AndrewGP on Saturday 20th January 08:16
Thanks Andrew. I have been following your Elise and Clio threads for a while. Quite the pair!

This car is actually on 79k, although it feels like it has barely ticked over 40k. I would love to swap the wheels for Turinis but can't bring myself to spend 600 GBP on them just yet. I'll keep an eye out though. You know, just in case.

How did you find the EP3 in comparison to the 172 and the 182 FF?

AndrewGP

1,975 posts

161 months

Saturday 20th January 2018
quotequote all
samsul89 said:
Thanks Andrew. I have been following your Elise and Clio threads for a while. Quite the pair!

This car is actually on 79k, although it feels like it has barely ticked over 40k. I would love to swap the wheels for Turinis but can't bring myself to spend 600 GBP on them just yet. I'll keep an eye out though. You know, just in case.

How did you find the EP3 in comparison to the 172 and the 182 FF?
Ooops sorry, I misread the mileage! Turinis totaly change the look but are expensive. I found my set second hand on Cliosport and then refurbed them making the total £450. You could sell your existing wheels to offset though. I also added a cup spoiler. Here's a piccy:



I didn't swap my 172 for an EP3, I had an FN2. I decided that I wanted something a bit more grown up and whilst the FN2 itself was a very good car, it didn't have the sparkle and playfulness that the Clio has. You needed to be doing big speeds to feel like you were having fun which I didn't like. The engine and gearbox were sublime though and the interior was much nicer. After running that for a while, I realised I missed the Clio, so I swapped back to another after finding the 182 purely by chance. It's not something I've regretted as my commute is 25 minutes of A and B roads and I can forgive the interior and high driving position for the rear biased handling and sheer silliness of driving it. An EP3 is still something I'd like to try though.

avenger286

425 posts

102 months

Saturday 20th January 2018
quotequote all
Looks good. I would still like to try one of these to use on the road. My Twingo is not used on the road now and a 1.0 yaris is getting very tedious for daily duties.

ham355

21 posts

139 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
I run a 182, not found mine the cheapest ever, bought with great history from a seemingly very clued up ClioSport forum member.

Developed a 'tick' over it's first few months of ownership (some say a characteristic of the engine so I ran with it for a while, it's a 3rd car), seemed oil pressure had been running low and therefore top end had been running drier than it would have liked. A quick whip off of the rocker cover and the cams and head were knackered, badly scored.

So, a replacement engine was sourced, and £1500 later (inc diagnostics of original problem, belts, dephayser pulley and a full service, inc gearbox oil) it was fitted and running ok.

A gearbox leak and it was back in for a driveshaft bearing and boot, and i'd put the cold weather down to some poor cold start issues, garage spot head gasket leak from replacement engine (sourced from a very reputable breakers)

It's now at said breakers to have the head work done, FOC I must add, they have been fantastic.

With other bits I have bought for it, a £2k car has had well over £2k spent on it, but it would seem that I am perhaps a tad unlucky!

Still love it and miss it like crazy though!


rossub

4,400 posts

189 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
ham355 said:
With other bits I have bought for it, a £2k car has had well over £2k spent on it, but it would seem that I am perhaps a tad unlucky!
I doubt that. We sold the Mrs 172 when it was 5 years old and only 25k on it, because it was an unreliable POS even then. Put me off Renault for life, which is a shame because they’ve built some fun cars over the years.

Benjijames28

1,702 posts

91 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
If I was to ever have a second car for fun it would have to be one of these Clio's. The first 3 cars I ever owned were 1.2 Clio's. Starting with a 98 basic spec 5 door, then a 1.2 03 plate I bought and put in a ditch lol, then a 04 plate that was a lemon with a fked gearbox.

Now my insurance is cheaper a sporty Clio would be a great second car. Either that or a fiesta st. 4th car I owned was a mk7 fiesta, probably my fav car ever.

DickP

1,117 posts

149 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Can't say I've experienced the negative unreliability people talk of with Renault cars! My 182 has been fine other than replacing consumables and tidying it up a bit. 25k and a year and a bit later, still fine. smile

anonymous-user

53 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
ham355 said:
I run a 182, not found mine the cheapest ever, bought with great history from a seemingly very clued up ClioSport forum member.

Developed a 'tick' over it's first few months of ownership (some say a characteristic of the engine so I ran with it for a while, it's a 3rd car), seemed oil pressure had been running low and therefore top end had been running drier than it would have liked. A quick whip off of the rocker cover and the cams and head were knackered, badly scored.

So, a replacement engine was sourced, and £1500 later (inc diagnostics of original problem, belts, dephayser pulley and a full service, inc gearbox oil) it was fitted and running ok.

A gearbox leak and it was back in for a driveshaft bearing and boot, and i'd put the cold weather down to some poor cold start issues, garage spot head gasket leak from replacement engine (sourced from a very reputable breakers)

It's now at said breakers to have the head work done, FOC I must add, they have been fantastic.

With other bits I have bought for it, a £2k car has had well over £2k spent on it, but it would seem that I am perhaps a tad unlucky!

Still love it and miss it like crazy though!
That sounds very unfortunate. I've had my 172 cup for over 3 years now and not had anything go majorly wrong with it and I tend to drive it quite hard.

Oh Behave

337 posts

224 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2018
quotequote all
I sold my 172 cup on NYE and got to say it was a cracking little car. Mine was track prepped but despite ticking over 126,000 miles felt as strong as ever. Apart from a new alternator and throttle body, it took so much abuse and kept coming back for more. Part of me now thinks I should have kept it as now am struggling to find a replacement but I was more than happy with what I got for it, nearly 4 times what I purchased it for!

culpz

4,881 posts

111 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2018
quotequote all
I'm gonna be buying a Clio 172/182 in the next few months. I'm looking forward to it and have always wanted one. It'll be my daily aswell as my fun car and hopefully i'll get it out on track too. Coming from a couple of lease cars, it does worry me a bit, but more so because i'm not that great with a spanner.