Audi TT RS: PH Fleet
There's a sense of flux about Audi Sport at the moment - which is to the benefit of our coupe
For me, the TT, no matter what engine has been shoehorned into its britches, falls well short of the chin-jutting attitude exhibited by a car that I still associate with Walter Rohrl and Stig Blomqvist. However, I will concede that the RS's standing has undergone a tectonic shift since we took delivery. Much of it is to do with the repositioning of Neckarsulm's other contenders.
What has followed recently has not necessarily been for the worse - there's a fine argument which says that the new 2.9-litre V6 engined iterations of RS4 and 5 are better daily drivers than they've ever been - but you'd have to be supremely generous not to notice that some of the edginess has been judiciously planed away in the pursuit of a more rounded setup.
Well, alright, I'd probably say the RS3 because it has a proper boot, genuine back seats and is better looking - but you see where I'm heading. The TT, to its coupe-sized credit, is usefully lighter and lower than its hatchback sibling (and very marginally quicker, too) and, with the adaptive dampers optioned - as you must - I'm not so sure that it doesn't ride with slightly greater aplomb as well.
Factor in the impeccable interior and seemingly indestructible build quality, and you've got the Neckarsulm way in a nutshell - one that costs about £35k less than the retiring RS6 Performance. All of this was rather brought home to roost by a colleague (and self-confessed Audi obsessive) who returned from a weekend in the TT's company with a bemused look on his face. "What do you think," I asked. "It's exactly as I expected," he replied. "Brilliant."
FACT SHEET
Car: 2017 Audi TT RS
Run by: Nic Cackett
On fleet since: December 2017
Mileage: 4,271 (delivered on 894)
List price new: £50,615 ( As tested £61,080 comprising £550 for Catalunya Red paint, £1,695 for 20-inch '7-spoke rotor' design alloy wheels in matt titanium-look with diamond cut finish, £325 for brake calipers in red with RS logo at the front, £895 for RS Red Design Pack, £945 for Matrix LED headlights with LED rear lights and dynamic front and rear indicators, £250 for Audi Smartphone Interface, £1,000 for RS Sport exhaust system, £995 for RS Sport suspension with Audi Magnetic Ride, £800 for electrically adjustable front seats, £800 for Matrix OLED rear lights, £325 for Audi Phone Box with wireless charging, £1,830 for on the road costs and £55 for first registration fee)
Previous reports:
Say hello to the 400hp TT
.......Right.
Now these TT RS are into £60k Territory With a few options ,I think I would add a few extra pounds and go for a lotus Evora 400, which is better in most departments I value in a car: (having driven 400 and previous TTRS I would remark)
- Looks - no contest, one looks unique and special the other a modified very common car.
- Comfort and "special" feeling, I prefer the Evora by a country mile.
- Sound - both make different but very Nice noises
- Gearbox, cant get the Audi With a manual ;-(
- Wet weather performance the Audi has it pipped
- Far better steering in Evora, atually feels Connected to front Wheels.
- Practicality they are Equal.
- I bet the Evora engine & gearbox would at least be on par in reliability.
Mien gets driven quite hard, not the last word in feedback being a MK1 but I enjoy it.
As for the car I've kinda liked the idea of the TT ever since I saw one take a roundabout at speed without sliding (I'd guess around 80 mph on entry), but never got around to giving one a go.
Edit to advise: First 6 paragraphs were good, it's the last 2 that are a bit heavy.
Audi say it's normal for cars with double wishbones as the tyres wear, is that correct?
Like all high performance front transaxle Haldex’d cars, it will lunch it’s front tyres. They all do,
Now these TT RS are into £60k Territory With a few options ,I think I would add a few extra pounds and go for a lotus Evora 400, which is better in most departments I value in a car: (having driven 400 and previous TTRS I would remark)
- Looks - no contest, one looks unique and special the other a modified very common car.
- Comfort and "special" feeling, I prefer the Evora by a country mile.
- Sound - both make different but very Nice noises
- Gearbox, cant get the Audi With a manual ;-(
- Wet weather performance the Audi has it pipped
- Far better steering in Evora, atually feels Connected to front Wheels.
- Practicality they are Equal.
- I bet the Evora engine & gearbox would at least be on par in reliability.
Looks are subjective, but I think the Evora looks like a crappy kit car. Don't love the TT but the RS looks nice.
Evora is probably a more special feeling car being mid-engined but you're kidding yourself if it will be as comfortable as an Audi.
The Evora sounds decent for a 6 but there are very few engine notes on earth that will be an inline-5, it's glorious.
Can't get the Audi with a manual but the S-tronic is fantastic. Depends what you want I get.
Pipped? The TT-RS would demolish most cars in adverse conditions.
I don't disagree, Evora is definitely better for feedback and feel.
Equal? Not really, the TT-RS has a proper boot and good visibility, but the Evora can't really help being mid-engined.
Maybe the engine because it's a Toyota unit, but it's everything else that breaks on a Lotus.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff