Tommy Robinson attacked at McDonald’s

[NoNeed]

e30m3Mark said:

2014 wasn't 16 years ago though. Unless you're getting TR to do your sums for you maybe?

you say that like you believe there is a manger from a mortgage company out there waiting to key tommies car, like they haven't already had their justice



Just to re-iterate you wouldn't want Tommy to have his picture with your car in case some dodgy banker with a good memory thinks that his prison sentence and full redemption of the loan amount wasn't enough, you guys crack me up

Edited by NoNeed on Saturday 17th November 13:52

[Evanivitch]

NoNeed said:

Evanivitch said:

The mortgage company

So nobody in the last 16 years then

Strong maths.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25862838

Perhaps it's his drug dealer he owes money.

Or the mate who he borrowed the passport of.

[NoNeed]

ape x said:

Aside from that Tommy has gone on record to say he pissed off loads of old EDL when he started to move away from them...

There are people on here that type EDL in sentences like he is still an active member, glad to see somebody noticed the seperation

[Countdown]

NoNeed said:

Countdown said:

People who realise he’s conned them out of money?

who is that then?

The ones that he begged for money, saying he needed it to sue Sky News, Cambs. Police etc.

[graylag]

del mar said:

What have I said / posted on here that would be an issue saying I front of them ?

Two of them don’t like Muslims
Ones wife said “all you white people look the same” - said in jest.

Another reckoned white privilege stopped me from getting a cheap price from the ladies working in the bar .... they look at me as a white man and assume I am rich and him as an Asian would be assumed as poorer - racist hookers !!

Edited by del mar on Saturday 17th November 13:08

You admitted a few pages back to being a racist.

Birds of a feather, when it comes to their dislike of a religion eh?

I’m sure you’ll have struck a deal with the locals around playing STD roulette.

[NoNeed]

Countdown said:

NoNeed said:

Countdown said:

People who realise he’s conned them out of money?

who is that then?

The ones that he begged for money, saying he needed it to sue Sky News, Cambs. Police etc.

Conned or begged? you need to make your mind up if you are going to continue with daft spurious allegations.

[Countdown]

NoNeed said:

Countdown said:

NoNeed said:

Countdown said:

People who realise he’s conned them out of money?

who is that then?

The ones that he begged for money, saying he needed it to sue Sky News, Cambs. Police etc.

Conned or begged? you need to make your mind up if you are going to continue with daft spurious allegations.

Is it an "either/or" ? Beggars can be con-men. Pleading poverty and begging for money and then splurging on an RRS with private plate suggests some of his supporters may have been conned.

Still, at least you're not trying to defend the vile sack of st.....

[e30m3Mark]

NoNeed said:

e30m3Mark said:

2014 wasn't 16 years ago though. Unless you're getting TR to do your sums for you maybe?

you say that like you believe there is a manger from a mortgage company out there waiting to key tommies car, like they haven't already had their justice



Just to re-iterate you wouldn't want Tommy to have his picture with your car in case some dodgy banker with a good memory thinks that his prison sentence and full redemption of the loan amount wasn't enough, you guys crack me up

Edited by NoNeed on Saturday 17th November 13:52

Erm, I think you're a little confused.

[Dindoit]

It’s fine NoNeed. You just telling yourself he used your donations to fight against The Man. I’m sure he used your money for that purpose and didn’t funnel any of it into buying a house, a Range Rover or a vanity plate.

Can I interest you in some magic beans? They’re guaranteed to get rid of pesky Muslims.

[The Dangerous Elk]

Can anybody here back up the allegations of fraud being discussed ?

I would like to see it to be able to condemn it and as these allegations are seemingly being repeated and backed up by a few posters here I am sure it will not take time to present the evidence.

[anonymous-user]

The Dangerous Elk said:

Can anybody here back up the allegations of fraud being discussed ?

I would like to see it to be able to condemn it and as these allegations are seemingly being repeated and backed up by a few posters here I am sure it will not take time to present the evidence.

He has been convicted of fraud so they arent allegations.

[graylag]

The Dangerous Elk said:

Can anybody here back up the allegations of fraud being discussed ?

I would like to see it to be able to condemn it and as these allegations are seemingly being repeated and backed up by a few posters here I am sure it will not take time to present the evidence.

This seems fairly conclusive

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-25862838

Or do you mean the ones about him not using donations to sue Sky etc? Has he launched his case yet?

[The Dangerous Elk]

desolate said:

The Dangerous Elk said:

Can anybody here back up the allegations of fraud being discussed ?

I would like to see it to be able to condemn it and as these allegations are seemingly being repeated and backed up by a few posters here I am sure it will not take time to present the evidence.

He has been convicted of fraud so they arent allegations.

Doh.

"Allegations" not convictions.

All this House/Range Rover/legal Money etc...as said, I will enjoy reading the proof you have.

[graylag]

The Dangerous Elk said:

Doh.

"Allegations" not convictions.

All this House/Range Rover/legal Money etc...as said, I will enjoy reading the proof you have.

This is gold. Your view is nothing can be discussed until it’s a conviction, unless there is concrete evidence to support the allegation.

Look forward to any comment that you pass on any subject at all and this will be thrown straight back at you.

Pure gold.

Edited to add, it smacks of censorship to me

Edited by graylag on Saturday 17th November 17:17

[The Dangerous Elk]

graylag said:

This is gold. Your view is nothing can be discussed until it’s a conviction, unless there is concrete evidence to support the allegation.

Look forward to any comment that you pass on any subject at all and this will be thrown straight back at you.

Pure gold.

Well done, test past in the first post. That was easy, I will make it more complicated next time

You draw the conclusion I wish to stop the discussion (whist I discuss it), this is another misrepresentation.

Now, lets try again, can some one please post the details of these allegations.

[Countdown]

The Dangerous Elk said:

Now, lets try again, can some one please post the details of these allegations.

Allegations of what?

[del mar]

graylag said:

You admitted a few pages back to being a racist.

Birds of a feather, when it comes to their dislike of a religion eh?

I’m sure you’ll have struck a deal with the locals around playing STD roulette.

So you have come up with nothing ?

I am not sure I did admit to that.

They all use protection.

[anonymous-user]

The Dangerous Elk said:

graylag said:

This is gold. Your view is nothing can be discussed until it’s a conviction, unless there is concrete evidence to support the allegation.

Look forward to any comment that you pass on any subject at all and this will be thrown straight back at you.

Pure gold.

Well done, test past in the first post. That was easy, I will make it more complicated next time

You draw the conclusion I wish to stop the discussion (whist I discuss it), this is another misrepresentation.

Now, lets try again, can some one please post the details of these allegations.

This from the loon who refused to post anything to back up his allegation that SYL holds “abhorrent views”. New Hypocrisy Meter please!

Please no to a further 20 pages of Elk wriggling because his dim-wittedness has painted him into another corner from which he can’t escape.

And bye again Tommy fan

[graylag]

del mar said:

So you have come up with nothing ?

I am not sure I did admit to that.

They all use protection.

Your posts are in the main criticism and ridiculing of Muslims. It’s fair to say you dislike them. The fact you appear to have confessed to being a racist before (you didn’t take issue with desolated comment a few pages back) is again sufficient for me.

As far the local brass, enjoy your 30 seconds.

[NoNeed]

Dindoit said:

It’s fine NoNeed. You just telling yourself he used your donations to fight against The Man. I’m sure he used your money for that purpose and didn’t funnel any of it into buying a house, a Range Rover or a vanity plate.

Can I interest you in some magic beans? They’re guaranteed to get rid of pesky Muslims.

You should read a bit more as I have said that it isn't my money.


And if you have some evidence that he has used money donated for one purpose and has used it elsewhere then don't be shy, let's see it.