How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 3)
Discussion
Mrr T said:
True its opinion. My opinion is based on having spent 30 years in various parts of the FS business. Also having a full understanding of the regulatory environment for passporting and selling FS in the EU. Obviously it best to ignore experts.
How's your prediction of 400,000 city job losses going? PurpleMoonlight said:
Deptford Draylons said:
Do you regard as ' promises ' the mass unemployment, recession, Nissan buggering off and half a hundred other similar of the Remain campaign stuff ?
The point is both campaigns were fundamentally flawed. Remain tried to frighten everyone, leave promised whatever people wanted.Criticising one but not the other because you happen to side with one is unfair.
I don't consider I was promised a recession or all the other things, I was warned this is what people thought might happen, but to word it as such seems a little disingenuous, bordering on propaganda.
The biggest problem with Brexit currently is everyone thinks they still have a good chance of reversing it completely, or effectively staying in the EU in all but name with the SM and CU. You aren't getting stories like the £6 visa fee etc for no reason. When it finally dawns on people that we will leave, it might be the time when people get serious. If anyone thinks the EU aren't stoking this with some hope of getting the 75% pro Remain Commons and HoL to get what they want, I'd suggest they are blind.
Watching QT last night was enlightening to see some just carried on with the pre referendum ' you'll all be poor ' and the doom laden predictions, just as if the failure to get the predictions right after the vote are meaningless in a 'sure we predicted doom and disaster and that never happened, but this time....' .
PurpleMoonlight said:
You think one side's campaign was fair and reasonable then?
Generalisations are too generalised. Both sides were well into terminological inexactitudes so the idea that one side was fair and reasonable is not only too general it's a strawman question.
One side had the weight of the government behind it including the PM and Chancellor, abused the civil service, and their whoppers were larger.
There's nothing close to equivalence about the two positions.
PurpleMoonlight said:
gooner1 said:
You think one sides campaign was fair and reasonable then?However, on the whole the debate from Leave was "we could do X, Y and Z outside of the EU" - which the Remain side are now interpreting as absolute promises (down to the timing and exact stages of a negotiating process that has never been tried before).
The Remain side went for more absolutes "leaving will cause immediate, dire consequences for the economy".
To be clear, David Davis has a habit of making over optimistic predictions which make for embarrassing quotes - however, there is a world of difference between a prediction of an uncertain process and 'expert research' presented as irrefutable facts. The Guardian article desperately wants Davis' comments to be treated as 'facts' that turned out to be 'lies', but that depends on believing that every interview he has given is in some way a legally binding commitment.
PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
One side got £9m of taxpayers' money to tell their lies.......was that fair?
I seem to recall shortly after the referendum was announced I got a UKIP leaflet through the door paid for by the EU.PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
One side got £9m of taxpayers' money to tell their lies.......was that fair?
I seem to recall shortly after the referendum was announced I got a UKIP leaflet through the door paid for by the EU.If not then it's not equivalent.
PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
How disgusting if true...........hope you registered your displeasure by voting to leave.
I did better, I recycled it.alfie2244 said:
So the EU gave UKIP money to produce a leaflet to influence a vote and not only did you not vote you threw the leaflet into the recycling bin..........what a waste of our taxpayers money...I bet they didn't even charge UKIP for a blue plaque to stick outside their offices.
It's all fair, the Government one went the same way, as do all my voting cards.PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
So the EU gave UKIP money to produce a leaflet to influence a vote and not only did you not vote you threw the leaflet into the recycling bin..........what a waste of our taxpayers money...I bet they didn't even charge UKIP for a blue plaque to stick outside their offices.
It's all fair, the Government one went the same way, as do all my voting cards.PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
So you just like wasting taxpayers' money.............Have you thought about online voting? Or would that mean putting your PC in the recycling bin as well?
Do you think people should be forced to vote?PurpleMoonlight said:
alfie2244 said:
So you just like wasting taxpayers' money.............Have you thought about online voting? Or would that mean putting your PC in the recycling bin as well?
Do you think people should be forced to vote?Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff