Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. (Vol 5)

[dickymint]

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

[V8 Fettler]

El stovey said:

Jinx said:

- which one do you think the burden of proof should be on?
And this is science so they both can be wrong.

The burden of proof should be on the side trying to change the collective judgment and position of the scientific community - The scientific consensus.

That’s how it works. A scientific consensus emerges, it gets disputed and disproved and that becomes the new scientific consensus.

Science generally relies on proof rather than consensus, otherwise there is a risk of vested interests and Groupthink.

[anonymous-user]

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

How your following the money trail going?

[dickymint]

El stovey said:

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

How your following the money trail going?

Easy so far ..... now back to the above ^^^

[anonymous-user]

dickymint said:

El stovey said:

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

How your following the money trail going?

Easy so far ..... now back to the above ^^^

Looks like you’ve missed the point as usual. Perhaps you’re misinterpreting the post?

[LoonyTunes]

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

Well of course I did.

It's exactly what I think though - so I used it just like others would do.

Jose Mourinho: "I thought Pogba had an average game today"

Me, on the united forum: I though Pogba had an average game today

Is this what the cult are reduced to, arguing on the margins


For the mentally challenged this is what was said:

jinx said:

The push has all been political and the single quote from the 2009 climate-gate emails tells you all you need to know:

excerpt from UEA emails said: said:

What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multidecadal natural fluctuation? They'll kill us probably.

So the claim you made was the bit emboldened above. I'm asking for you to back that up as context is everything.

Christ it's no wonder you lot aren't in agreement with the scientists.

[dickymint]

LoonyTunes said:

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

Well of course I did.

It's exactly what I think though - so I used it just like others would do.
.

You didn’t “use it” you abused it by trying to palm it off as your own and got caught. Then went off on a load of nested diversionary dribble quotes

[LoonyTunes]

dickymint said:

LoonyTunes said:

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

Well of course I did.

It's exactly what I think though - so I used it just like others would do.
.

You didn’t “use it” you abused it by trying to palm it off as your own and got caught. Then went off on a load of nested diversionary dribble quotes

Or the crux of the matter - but no, we'll continue to argue at the margins as thats all you have.

"Got caught" As if I don't know everything posted on here gets fed into google.

Got that cash traced yet detective?

[dickymint]

LoonyTunes said:

dickymint said:

LoonyTunes said:

dickymint said:

Jinx said:

LoonyTunes said:

You're the one making the claim - I'd suggest you do beforehand.

What claim? I merely quoted a quote. It's what they are there for.

then Loony added a response that was not in any of the emails (as far as I can see), passed it off as his own when it came from an article in the Guardian

Well of course I did.

It's exactly what I think though - so I used it just like others would do.
.

You didn’t “use it” you abused it by trying to palm it off as your own and got caught. Then went off on a load of nested diversionary dribble quotes

Or the crux of the matter - but no, we'll continue to argue at the margins as thats all you have.

"Got caught" As if I don't know everything posted on here gets fed into google.

Got that cash traced yet detective?

It was YOU that fed the Climategate email quote into Google (as you’re far too lazy to actually read the emails) found a Guardian article that had an addition to it by some other third party and
As regards your diversionary question - do your own research as most of us here know the answer why the companies you listed donate.

[LoonyTunes]

dickymint said:

As regards your diversionary question - do your own research as most of us here know the answer why the companies you listed donate.

Yes, of course you all know - its all a giant financial conspiracy init!!!

Got the e-mail trail we can have a look at?

Got a Scientific Institution to back you up yet?

Got the TATA money traced yet?

[LoonyTunes]

For DetectiveDicky - perhaps you can trace the money behind all of these?

1. The Royal Society
2. NASA
3. The National Center for Atmospheric Research
4. Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
5. International Research Institute for Climate and Society
6. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
7. Academies des Sciences, France
8. American Geophysical Union
9. American Association for the Advancement of Science
10. The British Antarctic Survey
11. American Chemical Society
12. American Meteorological Society
13. U.S. Global Change Research Program
14. American Physical Society
15. American Association Of State Climatologists
16. Geological Society of America
17. US National Academy of Sciences
18. American Astronomical Society
19. Australian Academy of Science
20. International Arctic Sciences Committee
21. The Royal Society of Canada
22. Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
23. German Academy of Sciences, Leopoldina
24. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

[dickymint]

LoonyTunes said:

dickymint said:

As regards your diversionary question - do your own research as most of us here know the answer why the companies you listed donate.

Yes, of course you all know - its all a giant financial conspiracy init!!!

Got the e-mail trail we can have a look at?

Got a Scientific Institution to back you up yet?

Got the TATA money traced yet?

You really do need A) grow up. B) stop trying impress your mates. C) stop polluting this thread with needless posts as a distraction when you lose or get found out.

[anonymous-user]

dickymint said:

You really do need A) grow up. B) stop trying impress your mates. C) stop polluting this thread with needless posts as a distraction when you lose or get found out.

Yet you’re the one constantly talking nonsense trolling and getting banned from the thread.

[dickymint]

El stovey said:

dickymint said:

You really do need A) grow up. B) stop trying impress your mates. C) stop polluting this thread with needless posts as a distraction when you lose or get found out.

Yet you’re the one constantly talking nonsense trolling and getting banned from the thread.

Yep that's me.......... grassed up by some schoolboy that likes hitting 'the report button' then the facts came to light and it got rescinded pretty quickly.

PS. is watching.

[LoonyTunes]

dickymint said:

El stovey said:

dickymint said:

You really do need A) grow up. B) stop trying impress your mates. C) stop polluting this thread with needless posts as a distraction when you lose or get found out.

Yet you’re the one constantly talking nonsense trolling and getting banned from the thread.

Yep that's me.......... grassed up by some schoolboy that likes hitting 'the report button' then the facts came to light and it got rescinded pretty quickly.

PS. is watching.

Lost? To you?

And if is watching I'd be a bit more careful from now on

[anonymous-user]

dickymint said:

Yep that's me.......... grassed up by some schoolboy that likes hitting 'the report button' then the facts came to light and it got rescinded pretty quickly.

PS. is watching.

Yes rob linked to your crybaby thread in website feedback.

Still hopefully you’ll have learned your lesson and stop trolling.

[dickymint]

El stovey said:

dickymint said:

Yep that's me.......... grassed up by some schoolboy that likes hitting 'the report button' then the facts came to light and it got rescinded pretty quickly.

PS. is watching.

Yes rob linked to your crybaby thread in website feedback.

Still hopefully you’ll have learned your lesson and stop trolling.

“Crybaby thread” what you mean I did the same as your mate Gadget did earlier (quite rightly too) to get a resolution? Do keep up old boy.

Oh and this was your mate's gloat on my "crybaby thread"..............

gadgetmac said:

Who did you insult? Was it me again? Was it?

Edited by dickymint on Tuesday 25th September 22:38

[Diderot]

Looney, did you manage to work the TATA thing out yet?

[dickymint]

Diderot said:

Looney, did you manage to work the TATA thing out yet?

Or Rolls Royce or many of the other companies/donors he mentioned?

[LoonyTunes]

Diderot said:

Looney, did you manage to work the TATA thing out yet?

Have you worked out why there aren't any Scientific Institutions on your side yet?