Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. (Vol 5)
Discussion
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
wc98 said:
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ?
Where do they get their funding from? The reason it’s important is because you deniers only quote wattsupwiththat and gpwf (despite deeps hiding the source and TB plagiarising the articles) and they’re both advocacy blogs.
It’s like presenting evidence of smoking not causing cancer and quoting a blog paid for by the tobacco industry as evidence whilst the other side are quoting the BMA and cancer experts and the vast majority of medical physicians.
Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 19th February 13:49
wc98 said:
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
wc98 said:
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
As oft' is the case look at the detail, read the whole article and don't be suckered in by confirmation bias.
The article quotes Watts "Heartland was helping him with $90,000 for a new project".
A new project.
Not his blog.
Or ever before.
Or a regular salary.
One project one payment.
jet_noise said:
Woah there gadge. That's a mighty universe-from-a-grain-of-sand extrapolation jump.
As oft' is the case look at the detail, read the whole article and don't be suckered in by confirmation bias.
The article quotes Watts "Heartland was helping him with $90,000 for a new project".
A new project.
Not his blog.
Or ever before.
Or a regular salary.
One project one payment.
Yes there’s obviously no connection between his blog and the heartland institute. As oft' is the case look at the detail, read the whole article and don't be suckered in by confirmation bias.
The article quotes Watts "Heartland was helping him with $90,000 for a new project".
A new project.
Not his blog.
Or ever before.
Or a regular salary.
One project one payment.
jet_noise said:
wc98 said:
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
As oft' is the case look at the detail, read the whole article and don't be suckered in by confirmation bias.
The article quotes Watts "Heartland was helping him with $90,000 for a new project".
A new project.
Not his blog.
Or ever before.
Or a regular salary.
One project one payment.
It was initially a "secret" project? Why a secret?
Watts never revealed this source of income until it leaked.
We only have his word for what it was for.
We also don't know what he's received since.
I never said it was for his blog in particular just that he received it.
That said, it is for work to be published on his blog at some point.
Watts, like Willie Soon, is just another conspiracy theorist for hire albeit one without any climate background (No, a TV weather presenter with zero qualifications is not a climate scientist).
El stovey said:
Where do they get their funding from?
The reason it’s important is because you deniers only quote wattsupwiththat and gpwf (despite deeps hiding the source and TB plagiarising the articles) and they’re both advocacy blogs.
It’s like presenting evidence of smoking not causing cancer and quoting a blog paid for by the tobacco industry as evidence whilst the other side are quoting the BMA and cancer experts and the vast majority of medical physicians.
The reason it’s important is because you deniers only quote wattsupwiththat and gpwf (despite deeps hiding the source and TB plagiarising the articles) and they’re both advocacy blogs.
It’s like presenting evidence of smoking not causing cancer and quoting a blog paid for by the tobacco industry as evidence whilst the other side are quoting the BMA and cancer experts and the vast majority of medical physicians.
His username gives a clue as to where to file his posts.
El stovey said:
robinessex said:
Anyone any idea how TB recruits followers then?
I’m guessing it’s his charismatic posting of irrelevant dogma and doctored graphs and charts?What was it that made you fall in love with him?
Edited by robinessex on Tuesday 19th February 15:58
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
Source the Guardian. Conclusion, bkshttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
El stovey said:
wc98 said:
seriously ? so fking what. where do skeptical science, desmogblog, the crazy bh sou hotwopper,real climate, attp, yale climate connections and hundreds of other pro alarmist organisations get their funding or don't you care about that ?
Where do they get their funding from? The reason it’s important is because you deniers only quote wattsupwiththat and gpwf (despite deeps hiding the source and TB plagiarising the articles) and they’re both advocacy blogs.
It’s like presenting evidence of smoking not causing cancer and quoting a blog paid for by the tobacco industry as evidence whilst the other side are quoting the BMA and cancer experts and the vast majority of medical physicians.
Edited by El stovey on Tuesday 19th February 13:49
El stovey said:
It’s like presenting evidence of smoking not causing cancer and quoting a blog paid for by the tobacco industry as evidence whilst the other side are quoting the BMA and cancer experts and the vast majority of medical physicians.
You have an endearingly naive view of altruistic experts and evil corporations.Medical research is overwhelmingly funded by huge pharmaceutical firms. They are are only interested in cures that come in pill form. Preferably of the "one daily for life" variety.
Oil companies are now oil and gas companies, fully in favour of whatever we are calling Climate Change this week, because it penalises coal, which is otherwise quite cheap.
So which is altruistic and truthful, and thus allowed to fund the scientists you will trust?
Cultured lab meat may make climate change worse
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-472...
Growing meat in the laboratory may do more damage to the climate in the long run than meat from cattle, say scientists.
Researchers are looking for alternatives to traditional meat because farming animals is helping to drive up global temperatures.
However, meat grown in the lab may make matters worse in some circumstances.
Researchers say it depends on how the energy to make the lab meat is produced....................continues
How about a new headline
ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING HUMAN BEINGS DO PRODUCES CO2. THEREFORE (ENTER IDIOTS NAME HERE) RECOMMEND THAT FROM NOW ON, ALL HUMANS LAY VERY STILL IN BED ALL DAY TO MINIMISE THEIR CO2 OUTPUT BY ENGAGING IN ANY FORM OF EMPLOYMENT. FURTHERMORE, ALL SPORTING ACTIVITIES TO BE BANNED.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-472...
Growing meat in the laboratory may do more damage to the climate in the long run than meat from cattle, say scientists.
Researchers are looking for alternatives to traditional meat because farming animals is helping to drive up global temperatures.
However, meat grown in the lab may make matters worse in some circumstances.
Researchers say it depends on how the energy to make the lab meat is produced....................continues
How about a new headline
ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING HUMAN BEINGS DO PRODUCES CO2. THEREFORE (ENTER IDIOTS NAME HERE) RECOMMEND THAT FROM NOW ON, ALL HUMANS LAY VERY STILL IN BED ALL DAY TO MINIMISE THEIR CO2 OUTPUT BY ENGAGING IN ANY FORM OF EMPLOYMENT. FURTHERMORE, ALL SPORTING ACTIVITIES TO BE BANNED.
durbster said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
durbster said:
But what's your point?
Why do believers immediately assume a cull is being proposed?Pan Pan Pan said:
Once any person arrives on the planet, they should have the same rights as anyone else. The key is keeping the salami in the underpants in the first place. People who have not been conceived / born don't know that they have not been conceived / born, and don't therefore feel they are missing out on anything.,
As for all those Striking for the Climate kids ... I have no time whatsoever for those who bleat on about saving the planet ... Is it that they expect someone `else' to stop doing the things ... don't feel that they should give up anything ... bleat on about climate change ... who still like jetting off to Disneyworld ... want their dwellings heated in winter ... because little Dwayne has discovered he doesn't like chicken nuggets any more. ... F*cking hypocrites.
Thanks for the gammon. As for all those Striking for the Climate kids ... I have no time whatsoever for those who bleat on about saving the planet ... Is it that they expect someone `else' to stop doing the things ... don't feel that they should give up anything ... bleat on about climate change ... who still like jetting off to Disneyworld ... want their dwellings heated in winter ... because little Dwayne has discovered he doesn't like chicken nuggets any more. ... F*cking hypocrites.
Well, I think that answers my question: you don't really have a point. You're just generally angry at people you know nothing about based entirely on assumptions you've made with no basis.
robinessex said:
gadgetmac said:
Leak exposes how The Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
Source the Guardian. Conclusion, bkshttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/e...
Includes $90,000 given to a certain Mr Watts.
The leak confirms that Heartland is a major source of funding to denier blogs.
Check it out.
Edited by gadgetmac on Tuesday 19th February 17:32
robinessex said:
Only a complete pillock could equate smoking, a substance with about 500 poisonous chemicals, to CO2, a perfectly natural action essential to life. It makes me shudder every time you post complete nonsense that someone thinks you are mentally fit enough to fly an airplane.
Even in a Liberal democracy the fact that you are allowed a keyboard and an Internet connection is far-far scarier.robinessex said:
It makes me shudder every time you post complete nonsense that someone thinks you are mentally fit enough to fly an airplane.
As I’ve pointed out, the last time you questioned my mental wellbeing, I’ve had plenty of mental assessments over my career from a variety of people. I did ask when your last assessment was but you declined to answer.
I’m afraid it’s quite clear there’s no way you’d be assessed fit to operate a lawnmower let alone a large aircraft.
You should definitely get assessed because, you could do with some help.
Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 19th February 18:53
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff