How do we think EU negotiations will go? (Vol 5)

[citizensm1th]

PurpleMoonlight said:

gooner1 said:

If you don't vote you really need to consider your own inaction and not those around you..

What's that supposed to mean?

you don't get a say in an outcome if you did not participate in the process.


hard not to agree with him IMO

[PurpleMoonlight]

citizensm1th said:

you don't get a say in an outcome if you did not participate in the process.


hard not to agree with him IMO

How are those who did vote getting a say exactly?

[Garvin]

Allanv said:

MaxSo said:

How do we think EU negotiations will go?

Very badly and for a very long time.

https://share.trin.cam.ac.uk/sites/public/Comms/Ro...

Well that was a waste of 5 minutes, the guy is talking out of his arse.

The ancien regime indeed.

I don’t think he is talking out of his rear end per se but he is definitely talking with a good dose of bias thrown in.

[Vanden Saab]

MaxSo said:

How do we think EU negotiations will go?

Very badly and for a very long time.

https://share.trin.cam.ac.uk/sites/public/Comms/Ro...

Yay, you got the Gospel according to Ivan on the first page.
Well done you...

[Helicopter123]

Negotiations with the EU appear to be heading towards a conclusion with a revised chequers plan to be agreed with the EU.

That may turn out to be the easy bit. Getting agreement in cabinet, the Tory party and then parliament looks impossible at present.

[gooner1]

PurpleMoonlight said:

What's that supposed to mean?

Whatever you want it to mean.

[alfie2244]

citizensm1th said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

gooner1 said:

If you don't vote you really need to consider your own inaction and not those around you..

What's that supposed to mean?

you don't get a say in an outcome if you did not participate in the process.


hard not to agree with him IMO

That told him

Now where's that cake gone?

[PurpleMoonlight]

alfie2244 said:

That told him

Now where's that cake gone?

You want some?

GettyCake-1400x788 by Don Beech, on Flickr

[Vanden Saab]

Garvin said:

Allanv said:

MaxSo said:

How do we think EU negotiations will go?

Very badly and for a very long time.

https://share.trin.cam.ac.uk/sites/public/Comms/Ro...

Well that was a waste of 5 minutes, the guy is talking out of his arse.

The ancien regime indeed.

I don’t think he is talking out of his rear end per se but he is definitely talking with a good dose of bias thrown in.

Bias you say, have a quick look at where he studied and who he worked for. It is like a whos who of Remnantcy…

[alfie2244]

PurpleMoonlight said:

alfie2244 said:

That told him

Now where's that cake gone?

You want some?

GettyCake-1400x788 by Don Beech, on Flickr

Wot no cherry.........who stole the cherry?

[PurpleMoonlight]

gooner1 said:

Whatever you want it to mean.

Okay, I think it means you love me really.

[PurpleMoonlight]

alfie2244 said:

Wot no cherry.........who stole the cherry?

I have cherry pie?

2635272a-61b1-4bdd-8ed9-3126d238d465_Landscape by Don Beech, on Flickr

[citizensm1th]

PurpleMoonlight said:

citizensm1th said:

you don't get a say in an outcome if you did not participate in the process.


hard not to agree with him IMO

How are those who did vote getting a say exactly?

Well those that won are getting what they wanted , the rest of us are getting to chuckle at the clusterfk they are making of it.

Those that did not consider it important to take part are getting laughed at by all the people who took part.

[don'tbesilly]

citizensm1th said:

don'tbesilly said:

I'd guess that would depend if people like you continue to bait previously banned members into reacting to your inflammatory posts.

Do brexiteers not have either the maturity or self control not to reply then?

sounds rather childlike to me

From the poster who stated he wanted to get sidicks banned, and would make the efforts to do just that.

The same poster who voted for May in the 2017 GE so he could boast to all and sundry he only voted for May so she could 'own' Brexit.

The same poster used the word 'maturity' in his post, a word he clearly doesn't understand.

The same poster suggested some posters were childish, whilst demonstrating the very same trait previously.

[PurpleMoonlight]

citizensm1th said:

Well those that won are getting what they wanted , the rest of us are getting to chuckle at the clusterfk they are making of it.

Those that did not consider it important to take part are getting laughed at by all the people who took part.

Do those that won know they won, because they don't seem to know they won.

But that's not having a say in the outcome as you claimed. How are leavers having a say in the outcome?

[citizensm1th]

don'tbesilly said:

From the poster who stated he wanted to get sidicks banned, and would make the efforts to do just that.

turns out out he managed to do that all by himself.

don'tbesilly said:

The same poster who voted for May in the 2017 GE so he could boast to all and sundry he only voted for May so she could 'own' Brexit.

Yep and it is turning out as planned

[Helicopter123]

PurpleMoonlight said:

citizensm1th said:

Well those that won are getting what they wanted , the rest of us are getting to chuckle at the clusterfk they are making of it.

Those that did not consider it important to take part are getting laughed at by all the people who took part.

Do those that won know they won, because they don't seem to know they won.

But that's not having a say in the outcome as you claimed. How are leavers having a say in the outcome?

Any leavers unhappy with their Chequers style Brexit are welcome to campaign for a second referendum or GE at which they can express their views. As very few seem to be, they must be delighted with the direction of negotiations.

[Tuna]

Helicopter123 said:

Any leavers unhappy with their Chequers style Brexit are welcome to campaign for a second referendum or GE at which they can express their views. As very few seem to be, they must be delighted with the direction of negotiations.

Just as Remainers in the Government have worked behind the scenes to 'get their way', so too are those unhappy with Chequers. If I were you, I wouldn't put money on the eventual outcome

... but, please stop trying to put words into other people's mouths. It's tedious.

[Tuna]

sidicks said:

Coolbanana said:

A 5th Volume to poke fun at the Leaver's on!

A 5th volume to poke fun at those who aren’t sufficiently educated to be able to use apostrophes correctly!

I think he's doing it deliberately. It's been pointed out enough times that his accusations of illiteracy are usually peppered with spelling and grammatical mistakes but either he's following Junker's lead and starting early in the day, or he just doesn't care.

[don'tbesilly]

Helicopter123 said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

citizensm1th said:

Well those that won are getting what they wanted , the rest of us are getting to chuckle at the clusterfk they are making of it.

Those that did not consider it important to take part are getting laughed at by all the people who took part.

Do those that won know they won, because they don't seem to know they won.

But that's not having a say in the outcome as you claimed. How are leavers having a say in the outcome?

Any leavers unhappy with their Chequers style Brexit are welcome to campaign for a second referendum or GE at which they can express their views. As very few seem to be, they must be delighted with the direction of negotiations.

Yet your beloved Union are far from in love with the Chequers proposal, in it's original form it's as dead as a dodo, in a modified manner it's already been condemned by Raab, so as it stands there is no need for any campaigning against it

Whatever May negotiates is arguably a wast of time, Labour have already stated it would be voted down without knowing what any deal would be, so it seems whatever happens it's a 'No Deal' scenario.