Yellow vests - fuel protest day of action in France
Discussion
The Hypno-Toad said:
I have seen some of that stuff before. I remember its something about that there's a secret society of the five wealthiest people in the world, known as The Pentavirate, who run everything in the world, including the newspapers, and they meet with all the other important world leaders at Bohemian Grove? The leaders of this group are The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds and all the fast food companies because they put mind-control chemicals in their food.
Is that a good place to start?
Q provides links, suggests you look at them and do your own research, nothing more.Is that a good place to start?
What happens then is up to you, the idea is to get people asking questions.
The Hypno-Toad said:
Is that a good place to start?
Morning...What I thought last night is that I/we have engaged into a topic that simply most of the UK population haven't heard of,it's very big in the USA and I fully agree that it's way out there stuff.
I don't think it's fair that someone who comes on PH to look at a yellow vest thread is hit with this quite frankly horrific stuff and believe me when you are diverted to the multiple links of the chain then sit back and be prepared to be horrified. If you use twitter then you will know how it works,on a topic under say wwg1wga or Qanon you will see many highlighted links that take you everywhere but in some way or another they are linked and the yellow vest movement is included. (I'm not saying that all the yellow vest wearing movements going Globally know of Q) but the word is spreading.
Add J. P Morgan to your list. Up until recently I thought the Titanic hit an ice berg and that was that. Yeah.... look into it "properly" hrs of it or you can dismiss it as a conspiracy as you can with Q I really don't care what you or others believe or not. But as I've said people blaring out tin foil hat nut jobs all the time don't work these days.. Have you recently looked into the Man on moon where it's been confirmed that it was filmed. The director had a suicide just before the completion of his latest film exposing(Is that the right word) the cabal and it's cult.
So if anyone is generally interested you can PM me as I'm obviously way way ahead on this and the threads are being hijacked by shills and trolls.They are picked up pretty quickly by the Anons and when you have spent the time I have on it you kind of spot them,but for someone new it can be very miss leading.
WWG1WGA
Unless of course you on PH or the mods are happy to continue discuss this I will respond but the way I'm looking it it's all a bit out there stuff on a yellow vest thread (But as said it's connected)
As I mentioned to Eddie if you locate my YT channel I have multiple links that can lead you to threads I consider to be good (That's my opinion and am entitled to it) but if you are a lefty thinking politics person then maybe skip some as you may have a bad day. But I don't know how much info my channel shows looking from outside in. But this yellow vests is not left or right way of thinking it's everyone apart from the elites.
Edited: Another one to look into is the "Clinton Foundation"
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 12:16
TVRJAS said:
...the way I'm looking it it's all a bit out there stuff on a yellow vest thread (But as said it's connected)
TBF one of the books I'm reading at the moment, "Why Globalisation Works" by Martin Wolf touches on the issue of general "anti capitalists" and "anti globalists". The author argues that the broader group is made up of many disparate movements who are often very difficult to link in terms of what they are 'for', but are easy to align in terms of what they are 'against'. The yellow vests would undoubtedly fall within this broader group of interest, alongside, for example, those against the EU and bureaucracy, as well as others who dislike banks or big business.https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/116824.Why_Glo...
Digga said:
I'm generally impressed that people read books such as this and I confess it's probably/it is way over my head. I don't have 10 "A" levels or a Masters in anything and the vast intelligence you need to absorb figures and how it all works is way above me and I'm sure as hell am never going to get into a discussion with you over such a topic,you are obviously well more knowledgeable in this field than I. (That's enough of blowing your trumpet) But I don't regard myself as an idiot either(Debatable I hear you say) and if I really need to know something then I'll look into and research,but economics and the numbers game is something that I find very difficult.
I read some of the comments/views on the book but again at a 1st glance I really can't figure it out.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 13:04
TVRJAS said:
Digga said:
I'm generally impressed that people read books such as this and I confess it's probably/it is way over my head. I don't have 10 "A" levels or a Masters in anything and the vast intelligence you need to absorb figures and how it all works is way above me and I'm sure as hell am never going to get into a discussion with you over such a topic,you are obviously well more knowledgeable in this field than I. (That's enough of blowing your trumpet) But I don't regard myself as an idiot either(Debatable I hear you say) and if I really need to know something then I'll look into and research,but economics and the numbers game is something that I find very difficult.
I read some of the comments/views on the book but again at a 1st glance I really can't figure it out.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 13:04
Only part way into it, so not sure how good a read (or not) it is.
Digga said:
No qualifications needed to read the book. The author is hugely well qualified to comment - well worth reading the preface which details his background.
Only part way into it, so not sure how good a read (or not) it is.
I've never really been a massive book reader,off the top of head the last one I read was "Catch me if you can" there may of been one or two after but I'm really not sure.Only part way into it, so not sure how good a read (or not) it is.
I'm watching and reading so much stuff on the internet that I simply couldn't/don't want to read any books right now.
Good luck with your reading.
I came to the conclusion why have I got my head stuck in a book reading a novel when I could be out talking to someone or doing something in the real world,but I understand what you are reading at the moment is better than Harry Potter.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 13:30
Digga said:
TVRJAS said:
Digga said:
I'm generally impressed that people read books such as this and I confess it's probably/it is way over my head. I don't have 10 "A" levels or a Masters in anything and the vast intelligence you need to absorb figures and how it all works is way above me and I'm sure as hell am never going to get into a discussion with you over such a topic,you are obviously well more knowledgeable in this field than I. (That's enough of blowing your trumpet) But I don't regard myself as an idiot either(Debatable I hear you say) and if I really need to know something then I'll look into and research,but economics and the numbers game is something that I find very difficult.
I read some of the comments/views on the book but again at a 1st glance I really can't figure it out.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 13:04
Only part way into it, so not sure how good a read (or not) it is.
I will consult and engage professionals, by and large trusting them until they prove otherwise.
To any followers of Qanon, I've got some explosive inside information on the illuminati control of the Royal family, their secret spaceship built under Nelsons Column, and the REAL truth on the phenomenon of hipster beards.
Just IM me your credit card number, name, card expiry date and special number on the back......
.....only kidding, I know you guys dont trust the Rothchild controlled banks, so please send cash to PO box 41...etc etc...
Just IM me your credit card number, name, card expiry date and special number on the back......
.....only kidding, I know you guys dont trust the Rothchild controlled banks, so please send cash to PO box 41...etc etc...
tangerine_sedge said:
To any followers of Qanon, I've got some explosive inside information on the illuminati control of the Royal family,
I've got loads of info on our Royal family and it's Free.Edited: But this will not be discussed by me.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 15:53
Of course I don't know how many follow news outside of the UK but if you don't it's going to smash you in the face.
Just to mention a few.... Brussels,Austria,Sweden,Denmark,Greece,Hungary,Poland,Italy,Australia,Canada,USA, Germany and many more.
Germany didn't loose the war they just redirected their plan.. Germany controls the EU,as we speak Merkel( Check out her bloodline) is in Greece telling them how to run their country. Telling us the UK give up your Sovereignty and build an EU army to possible fight America (our allies)
And then the Immigration pact to let free movement of anymore unchecked to go where ever they like. Canada did a survey (a big one) and the people of Canada 94% didn't want it yet it was passed as the same for us as it wasn't put to us.
As I said this morning this now is moving away from the topic,it may of opened some eyes,some may look into it and laugh it off,I seriously don't care.
But for those that laugh it off I ask did you laugh off 911 twin towers building 7 conspiracy which is now in the proceeds of investigation. If you haven't looked for many years check out YT on all the evidence and then check out all the other countries mentioned as see what is happening.
EDIT : For those they may of had a quick 5-10 mins look and thought conspiracy nut jobs,then I would question any judgement/decisions you make in life. If you were going to invest in multi million pound investment would you spend 5-10 mins. If you are one of these if our paths cross then I wouldn't give you the time of day,move along as we have nothing in common.
Just to mention a few.... Brussels,Austria,Sweden,Denmark,Greece,Hungary,Poland,Italy,Australia,Canada,USA, Germany and many more.
Germany didn't loose the war they just redirected their plan.. Germany controls the EU,as we speak Merkel( Check out her bloodline) is in Greece telling them how to run their country. Telling us the UK give up your Sovereignty and build an EU army to possible fight America (our allies)
And then the Immigration pact to let free movement of anymore unchecked to go where ever they like. Canada did a survey (a big one) and the people of Canada 94% didn't want it yet it was passed as the same for us as it wasn't put to us.
As I said this morning this now is moving away from the topic,it may of opened some eyes,some may look into it and laugh it off,I seriously don't care.
But for those that laugh it off I ask did you laugh off 911 twin towers building 7 conspiracy which is now in the proceeds of investigation. If you haven't looked for many years check out YT on all the evidence and then check out all the other countries mentioned as see what is happening.
EDIT : For those they may of had a quick 5-10 mins look and thought conspiracy nut jobs,then I would question any judgement/decisions you make in life. If you were going to invest in multi million pound investment would you spend 5-10 mins. If you are one of these if our paths cross then I wouldn't give you the time of day,move along as we have nothing in common.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 16:42
PositronicRay said:
Digga said:
TVRJAS said:
Digga said:
I'm generally impressed that people read books such as this and I confess it's probably/it is way over my head. I don't have 10 "A" levels or a Masters in anything and the vast intelligence you need to absorb figures and how it all works is way above me and I'm sure as hell am never going to get into a discussion with you over such a topic,you are obviously well more knowledgeable in this field than I. (That's enough of blowing your trumpet) But I don't regard myself as an idiot either(Debatable I hear you say) and if I really need to know something then I'll look into and research,but economics and the numbers game is something that I find very difficult.
I read some of the comments/views on the book but again at a 1st glance I really can't figure it out.
Edited by TVRJAS on Thursday 10th January 13:04
Only part way into it, so not sure how good a read (or not) it is.
I will consult and engage professionals, by and large trusting them until they prove otherwise.
Wikki said:
In 1971, Wolf joined the World Bank's young professionals programme, becoming a senior economist in 1974. By the start of the eighties, Wolf was deeply disillusioned with the Bank's policies undertaken under the direction of Robert McNamara: the Bank had been strongly pushing for increased capital flows to developing countries, which had resulted in many of them suffering debt crises by the early 1980s. Seeing the results of misjudged intervention by global authorities and also influenced from the early 1970s by various works critical of government intervention, such as Friedrich Hayek's The Road to Serfdom, Wolf shifted his views towards the right and the free market.[1][2]
Wolf left the World Bank in 1981, to become Director of Studies at the Trade Policy Research Centre, in London. He joined the Financial Times in 1987, where he has been associate editor since 1990 and chief economics commentator since 1996. Up until the late 2000s, Wolf was an influential advocate of globalisation and the free market.
Wolf at the World Economic Forum in 2013.
In addition to his journalism and participation in various international forums, Wolf had also attempted to influence opinion with his books; he has stated that his 2004 book, Why Globalization Works, was intended to be a persuasive work rather than an academic study.[2] By 2008, Wolf had become disillusioned with theories promoting what he came to see excessive reliance on the private sector. While remaining a pragmatist free of binding commitments to any one ideology, Wolf's views partially shifted away from free market thinking back to the Keynesian ideas he had been taught when young.
He became one of the more influential drivers of the 2008–2009 Keynesian resurgence, and in late 2008 and early 2009, he used his platform on the Financial Times to advocate a massive fiscal and monetary response to the financial crisis of 2007–2010. According to Julia Ioffe writing in 2009 for The New Republic, he was "arguably the most widely trusted pundit" of the crisis.[1] Wolf is a supporter of a land value tax.[4]
Between 2010 and 2011, Wolf served on the Independent Commission on Banking.
In 2012, Wolf stated in remarks for the Financial Times that public goods are building blocks of civilisation: security and safety, knowledge and science, a sustainable environment, trust, the Rechtsstaat, and economic and financial stability.[5]
Wolf left the World Bank in 1981, to become Director of Studies at the Trade Policy Research Centre, in London. He joined the Financial Times in 1987, where he has been associate editor since 1990 and chief economics commentator since 1996. Up until the late 2000s, Wolf was an influential advocate of globalisation and the free market.
Wolf at the World Economic Forum in 2013.
In addition to his journalism and participation in various international forums, Wolf had also attempted to influence opinion with his books; he has stated that his 2004 book, Why Globalization Works, was intended to be a persuasive work rather than an academic study.[2] By 2008, Wolf had become disillusioned with theories promoting what he came to see excessive reliance on the private sector. While remaining a pragmatist free of binding commitments to any one ideology, Wolf's views partially shifted away from free market thinking back to the Keynesian ideas he had been taught when young.
He became one of the more influential drivers of the 2008–2009 Keynesian resurgence, and in late 2008 and early 2009, he used his platform on the Financial Times to advocate a massive fiscal and monetary response to the financial crisis of 2007–2010. According to Julia Ioffe writing in 2009 for The New Republic, he was "arguably the most widely trusted pundit" of the crisis.[1] Wolf is a supporter of a land value tax.[4]
Between 2010 and 2011, Wolf served on the Independent Commission on Banking.
In 2012, Wolf stated in remarks for the Financial Times that public goods are building blocks of civilisation: security and safety, knowledge and science, a sustainable environment, trust, the Rechtsstaat, and economic and financial stability.[5]
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff