Gatwick closed by drones

Author
Discussion

Whatsmyname

944 posts

77 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
hutchst said:
Easily? That's a bold statement. You get one shot at hitting a fast moving target somewhere between V1 & Vr, without knowing precisely where this will happen. Before V1 and it will stop on the runway, once it's airborne your chances of hitting the target are absolutely miniscule.
I thought youd have better chance on one coming into land? If the plan was approaching you at a lowish speed.

pingu393

7,784 posts

205 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
hutchst said:
roadsmash said:
I guess it’s a matter of perspective, but in my opinion that’s a medium size drone and could easily bring down a plane.
Easily? That's a bold statement. You get one shot at hitting a fast moving target somewhere between V1 & Vr, without knowing precisely where this will happen. Before V1 and it will stop on the runway, once it's airborne your chances of hitting the target are absolutely miniscule.
Obviously, I've never tried it, but I think that it is plausible (as Myth Busters would call it).

Aircraft at take-off and landing are very predictable.

S1KRR

12,548 posts

212 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
38911 said:
roadsmash said:
Do all people that work 23 years in aviation talk total nonsense?
Yeah, sorry but you’re talking utter tosh. Is your 23 years experience in Aviation spent as a baggage handler? Or maybe you work in McDonalds in the Departure Lounge? Because it sure as hell ain’t in any relevant profession....
laugh

bow

saaby93 said:
What do we think?

"endangering an aircraft"

£5K or 5 years?

They'll want to make an example of him. AND it was only a few days after Gatwick so he couldn't have pretended not to know the rules


hutchst

3,699 posts

96 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Whatsmyname said:
I thought youd have better chance on one coming into land? If the plan was approaching you at a lowish speed.
Possibly, but losing thrust from one engine that close to touchdown if much less critical.

aeropilot

34,566 posts

227 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
That's not the one the shut down Heathrow for a short while though at about 5pm one evening, as they are claiming this incident took place on Christmas Eve, so not the same incident.

kev1974

4,029 posts

129 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
I think a key reason a terrorist (or village idiot just out flying their drone in a badly chosen place) is the speed the target plane moves at, when they are landing/taking off I believe they are moving in the region of 150-200mph, and when cruising up to 500mph? A (non-military spec) drone is not something that can lock on to an engine or other specific part of an airliner, so doing it by eye when the target is hundreds or thousands of feet above you and moving at those sorts of speeds and you've got to hit something specific like a wing or engine or windscreen, is a fair challenge.

aeropilot

34,566 posts

227 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
kev1974 said:
I think a key reason a terrorist (or village idiot just out flying their drone in a badly chosen place) is the speed the target plane moves at, when they are landing/taking off I believe they are moving in the region of 150-200mph, and when cruising up to 500mph?
Approach speeds on most modern airliners will be in the 140-160 knots region during the last mile or so to touchdown, and at 500ft and under, and this is the danger zone where a drone 'popping up' into an engine would be the main reason the laws as they now are, have been created.


PhillipM

6,517 posts

189 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
roadsmash said:
There are some drones powered by small batteries such as these:

That would only be fitted to one of those tiny little 3-axis indoor drones that you can land on your hand, certainly not something you'd attempt to fly outside even in still conditions.

roadsmash

2,622 posts

70 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
hutchst said:
roadsmash said:
I guess it’s a matter of perspective, but in my opinion that’s a medium size drone and could easily bring down a plane.
Easily? That's a bold statement. You get one shot at hitting a fast moving target somewhere between V1 & Vr, without knowing precisely where this will happen. Before V1 and it will stop on the runway, once it's airborne your chances of hitting the target are absolutely miniscule.
Wow some proper willy waving going on now (“look I know the difference between V1 and VR”).

I wasn’t really suggesting it would be “easy” to line a drone up with an aircraft’s engine, I was merely suggesting that once said drone IS lined up with the engine, that one of that size could easily cause issues.

roadsmash

2,622 posts

70 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
That would only be fitted to one of those tiny little 3-axis indoor drones that you can land on your hand, certainly not something you'd attempt to fly outside even in still conditions.
Understood, just pointing out that a battery of this nature would likely get through a jet engine without causing much damage whatsoever.

Whatsmyname

944 posts

77 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Can you get drones with target fixation?

pingu393

7,784 posts

205 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Whatsmyname said:
Can you get drones with target fixation?
You can make them stay a set X-Y-Z away from the controller, but that is not the same as what I think you are thinking.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Terrorists have fired rockets at aircraft a few times in Kenya and more recently Turkey and Egypt.

They’d happily fly a drone into an aircraft if they could. They seem to focus on high profile death and destruction though rather than causing disruption and delays.
In this country, I never worry about aircraft being attacked, I think we have excellent security (drone issues aside), but I worry about trains strangely enough.

I’m on high speed trans to London and back reasonably often, and as I see the GPS on my phone hover at around the 125-130mph mark, very occationally it crosses my mind that I hope no one has loosened a few bolts holding the rails down whilst screaming ‘Alan’s Snack Bar’.

To me, that’s more scary, probably because it would be easily done.

Whatsmyname

944 posts

77 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Lord Marylebone said:
In this country, I never worry about aircraft being attacked, I think we have excellent security (drone issues aside), but I worry about trains strangely enough.

I’m on high speed trans to London and back reasonably often, and as I see the GPS on my phone hover at around the 125-130mph mark, very occationally it crosses my mind that I hope no one has loosened a few bolts holding the rails down whilst screaming ‘Alan’s Snack Bar’.

To me, that’s more scary, probably because it would be easily done.
It would take a lot of man power and tooling to start loosening stuff off and moving things in order to derail a train, the signalling system would detect 90% of the things you tried anyway unless you were really clued up. There are far far easier ways of doing things - i.e have a spotter looking for a train to pass a certain point then drive a HGV thru a level crossing.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Whatsmyname said:
It would take a lot of man power and tooling to start loosening stuff off and moving things in order to derail a train, the signalling system would detect 90% of the things you tried anyway unless you were really clued up. There are far far easier ways of doing things - i.e have a spotter looking for a train to pass a certain point then drive a HGV thru a level crossing.
I feel slightly better now smile

But I don’t see how someone couldn’t Stihl-saw though the lines 5 mins before the next 125mph train arrived.

Maybe I worry too much!

Whatsmyname

944 posts

77 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
You'd probably get hit by a train before you cut thru the rail - its not a quick job especially free hand - you can remove quite a bit of rail surprisingly befor the train comes off, the army discovered this when testing explosives on rail lines.


aeropilot

34,566 posts

227 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Lord Marylebone said:
Maybe I worry too much!
yes


surveyor

17,817 posts

184 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
eltawater said:
Here's the battery from my mavic pro with a deck of cards for comparison.

One of the things they are concerned about is a damaged lithium battery ending up in say the cockpit or worse located in the nose cone or interior of the wing. Damaged lithium battery’s are highly unstable.

techguyone

3,137 posts

142 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
roadsmash said:
There are some drones powered by small batteries such as these:

That would only be fitted to one of those tiny little 3-axis indoor drones that you can land on your hand, certainly not something you'd attempt to fly outside even in still conditions.
Indeed, look at the battery rating 110 mAh (for comparison my mobile phone has a 4,000 mAh battery.

That US quarter? it's a almost the same size as our current 10p

Whatever drone was fitted to that battery would be lucky to take off outside let alone lunch itself on anything in the air, tbh (and I'm being charitable) it was a pretty pointless/stupid point to make and in no way representative of the kind of drone being spoken of in the thread.

RemyMartin81D

6,759 posts

205 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Lord Marylebone said:
I feel slightly better now smile

But I don’t see how someone couldn’t Stihl-saw though the lines 5 mins before the next 125mph train arrived.

Maybe I worry too much!
You do.

The track circuit would more than likely drop out and the corresponding signal revert to danger.