Nigel Farage Launches New Brexit Party.
Discussion
techiedave said:
A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
and thats the best remainers can do....The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
t
mondeoman said:
techiedave said:
A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
and thats the best remainers can do....The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
Otis Criblecoblis said:
mondeoman said:
techiedave said:
A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
and thats the best remainers can do....The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
techiedave said:
A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
You’re clearly right about percentages. Many leave voters thought 52% was more than 48% but it doesn’t seem to be so. The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
Otis Criblecoblis said:
mondeoman said:
techiedave said:
A bit of a mixed bag recently
The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
and thats the best remainers can do....The Eurovision shambles will undoubtedly add to the number of people deciding to vote for the Brexit party
The Brexit Partys election literature looks to be a major own goal
It mentions percentages. well the chances of the average Europhobian understanding what a percentage is fairly remote. In any case they would assume that its something foreign anyway and would be inclined to ignore the section.
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. 
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. Derek Smith said:
Rather than quote the whole sub-thread, I'll just quote the last post and summarise the leave campaign.
At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
Every single campaigner on both sides told us we would be out of the single market and customs union (hard brexit). It was crystal clear to anyone who saw any of the debates and programmes, the UK voted to leave in with that information.At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
Down and out said:
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. Burwood said:
Down and out said:
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. alfie2244 said:
Burwood said:
Down and out said:
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. Burwood said:
alfie2244 said:
Burwood said:
Down and out said:
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. jsf said:
Derek Smith said:
Rather than quote the whole sub-thread, I'll just quote the last post and summarise the leave campaign.
At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
Every single campaigner on both sides told us we would be out of the single market and customs union (hard brexit). It was crystal clear to anyone who saw any of the debates and programmes, the UK voted to leave in with that information.At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
alfie2244 said:
Burwood said:
alfie2244 said:
Burwood said:
Down and out said:
Randy Winkman said:
alfie2244 said:
Birds of a feather. 
Elysium said:
jsf said:
Derek Smith said:
Rather than quote the whole sub-thread, I'll just quote the last post and summarise the leave campaign.
At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
Every single campaigner on both sides told us we would be out of the single market and customs union (hard brexit). It was crystal clear to anyone who saw any of the debates and programmes, the UK voted to leave in with that information.At no time that I can remember was a hard brexit or no deal brexit discussed by the official leave campaign.
There were mentions of various 'options' - they weren't options of course - available to the UK if we did leave. Norway was mentioned a number of times, as was modified Norway. Then there was Iceland. I'm told that Canada was mentioned as well. Hard brexit was obvious by its absence.
Nowhere on the ballot paper did it discuss the form of brexit. For brexit to mean brexit one can only assume it must mean something that was promised by the official leave campaign.
Johnson never mentioned hard bexit being a possibility. He mentioned Norway almost every time.
I hope that answers your original question.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff