Gulf of Oman incidents

Author
Discussion

fido

16,797 posts

255 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
NRS said:
I'm a little puzzled how a 20-something year old can comment on the difference in life between the current lot, and someone overthrown 40 years ago?
Same reason i know how bad it was under Labour during the 70s. My dad was a shop steward and the unions had a lot of power - too much power. Then of course one can do their own reading and apply a modicum of balance to see the bigger picture. It doesn’t make me a Tory any more than saying someone from Iran who doesn’t like the regime is ‘westernised’.

Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
fido said:
NRS said:
I'm a little puzzled how a 20-something year old can comment on the difference in life between the current lot, and someone overthrown 40 years ago?
Same reason i know how bad it was under Labour during the 70s. My dad was a shop steward and the unions had a lot of power - too much power. Then of course one can do their own reading and apply a modicum of balance to see the bigger picture. It doesn’t make me a Tory any more than saying someone from Iran who doesn’t like the regime is ‘westernised’.
Unlike a lot of “revolutions” we see nowadays the 1979 revolution was purely an internal one, which suggests the majority of Iranians hated the Shah. Ergo the 20 year old girl’s viewpoint (about how life was better under the Shah) was probably a minority view.

glazbagun

14,279 posts

197 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
I'd love to know the internal wranglings going on in Iran over this. When the US went back on their own deal there was a lot of sympathy for Iran. Their tanker being stopped off Gibraltar was troublesome but evidently a point of dialogue.

Grabbing ships from the Hormuz Strait might play well from a domestic flag waving pov, but I can't see any scenario wherr it helps them internationaly.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Last time I went on a frigate it had a little hanger at the back with a lynx in it.

I keep reading the ship was steaming ahead to get there but just got there too late.why not send a helicopter?
I belive HMS Montrose has a similar set up. Why didn’t it send that out?

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

156 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
HannsG said:
It's a disgrace personally. An island nation and we ain't got enough ships....

Welcome to post brexit Britain. We have a muppet banging a young blond who dithers and talks bks.

Then you have Hunt who prefers posing with fish and chips.

Don't even get me started on Corbyn!

How on earth did we get in this position?
This.

Condi

17,190 posts

171 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
I'd love to know the internal wranglings going on in Iran over this. When the US went back on their own deal there was a lot of sympathy for Iran. Their tanker being stopped off Gibraltar was troublesome but evidently a point of dialogue.

Grabbing ships from the Hormuz Strait might play well from a domestic flag waving pov, but I can't see any scenario wherr it helps them internationaly.
They had warned about it, and as has been pointed out, there are questions over the legality of the holding of the Iranian tanker anyway. Even if it was legal(ish), then who in the UK government thought it was a good idea to continue to poke the bear, when at the same time they were publicly stating that Iran should keep to the nuclear agreement which was abandoned by the US, negating any possible benefit to Iran from sticking to their side of the bargain. There has been lots of talk from the EU partners, but little action which benefits Iran, and as they say, talk is cheap.

IMO this was all totally preventable at 3 or 4 stages, and it is hardly surprising what has happened.

NRS

22,163 posts

201 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Countdown said:
fido said:
NRS said:
I'm a little puzzled how a 20-something year old can comment on the difference in life between the current lot, and someone overthrown 40 years ago?
Same reason i know how bad it was under Labour during the 70s. My dad was a shop steward and the unions had a lot of power - too much power. Then of course one can do their own reading and apply a modicum of balance to see the bigger picture. It doesn’t make me a Tory any more than saying someone from Iran who doesn’t like the regime is ‘westernised’.
Unlike a lot of “revolutions” we see nowadays the 1979 revolution was purely an internal one, which suggests the majority of Iranians hated the Shah. Ergo the 20 year old girl’s viewpoint (about how life was better under the Shah) was probably a minority view.
As Countdown says. And, to cover the point of view of this young lady in particular, then anyone can have a valid argument who has read about it/ been told about. Since neither is first hand opinion. And my general experience from friends/ people who have been doing well under one regime (sometimes a bad one - take South Africa for example) can be very biased in what the "majority" view one. In reality it's just their own one - or what they were told by parents. Valid, but not exactly unbiased either.

glazbagun said:
I'd love to know the internal wranglings going on in Iran over this. When the US went back on their own deal there was a lot of sympathy for Iran. Their tanker being stopped off Gibraltar was troublesome but evidently a point of dialogue.

Grabbing ships from the Hormuz Strait might play well from a domestic flag waving pov, but I can't see any scenario wherr it helps them internationaly.
They're screwed anyway. The US has put sanctions on them, and very few people/countries will risk doing anything with them, as the US sanctions and possibly getting thrown in prison etc as a result is going to put them off. It's why the current deal is completely dead without the US, despite still being "supported" by the EU countries.

djc206

12,350 posts

125 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Last time I went on a frigate it had a little hanger at the back with a lynx in it.

I keep reading the ship was steaming ahead to get there but just got there too late.why not send a helicopter?
I belive HMS Montrose has a similar set up. Why didn’t it send that out?
Because one helicopter wouldn’t stand a chance against the Iranian forces already there? The only hope was a far greater force than the Iranians had present in order to avoid a skirmish, which would be Montrose itself? Just a guess I’m not a military man myself but it makes sense to me.

The Iranians have what they want now, we’ve got one each and we’ll both be releasing each other’s ships soon I would imagine. Seize another of theirs and no doubt they’ll do the same again. It’s a silly game.

Let’s not forget that Tehran doesn’t exactly have a tight grip on the Revolutionary Guards either. They’re part of the ideological branch of the country. This may not have been sanctioned by Rouhani’s government in its entirety and may have been more of an honour thing at the behest of Khamenei.

Escy

3,931 posts

149 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Condi said:
Even if it was legal(ish), then who in the UK government thought it was a good idea to continue to poke the bear, when at the same time they were publicly stating that Iran should keep to the nuclear agreement which was abandoned by the US
America says "jump", we say "how high?"

You can almost guarantee we took that tanker on their say so.

Fundoreen

4,180 posts

83 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
As if the world doesnt have enough problems we seem to have manufactured this one. The US backed out of a deal but somehow the UK seems to be enforcing the US position.
The rest of the world looks on bemused at what we are up to with our last little thrash around before OAP status .
You would think with energy security from their own fracking and drilling the US would leave the middle east alone a bit but they have to create stress for the rest of the world that depends on oil from the area.
Who's going to pay?
Maybe the ghoulish evil saudis will bankroll it to be done with israeli brains and knowhow thus making them both even more beloved than ever.

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Aren't some of the crew Russian? What has Putin got to say about that?

s2art

18,937 posts

253 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Fundoreen said:
As if the world doesnt have enough problems we seem to have manufactured this one. The US backed out of a deal but somehow the UK seems to be enforcing the US position.
The rest of the world looks on bemused at what we are up to with our last little thrash around before OAP status .
You would think with energy security from their own fracking and drilling the US would leave the middle east alone a bit but they have to create stress for the rest of the world that depends on oil from the area.
Who's going to pay?
Maybe the ghoulish evil saudis will bankroll it to be done with israeli brains and knowhow thus making them both even more beloved than ever.
Hold on. We intercepted the Iranian ship because of EU sanction, not the USA.

Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
s2art said:
Fundoreen said:
As if the world doesnt have enough problems we seem to have manufactured this one. The US backed out of a deal but somehow the UK seems to be enforcing the US position.
The rest of the world looks on bemused at what we are up to with our last little thrash around before OAP status .
You would think with energy security from their own fracking and drilling the US would leave the middle east alone a bit but they have to create stress for the rest of the world that depends on oil from the area.
Who's going to pay?
Maybe the ghoulish evil saudis will bankroll it to be done with israeli brains and knowhow thus making them both even more beloved than ever.
Hold on. We intercepted the Iranian ship because of EU sanction, not the USA.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/20/britain-lured-into-deadly-trap-on-iran-by-trump-hawk-john-bolton

Zarco

17,845 posts

209 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Countdown said:
s2art said:
Fundoreen said:
As if the world doesnt have enough problems we seem to have manufactured this one. The US backed out of a deal but somehow the UK seems to be enforcing the US position.
The rest of the world looks on bemused at what we are up to with our last little thrash around before OAP status .
You would think with energy security from their own fracking and drilling the US would leave the middle east alone a bit but they have to create stress for the rest of the world that depends on oil from the area.
Who's going to pay?
Maybe the ghoulish evil saudis will bankroll it to be done with israeli brains and knowhow thus making them both even more beloved than ever.
Hold on. We intercepted the Iranian ship because of EU sanction, not the USA.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/20/britain-lured-into-deadly-trap-on-iran-by-trump-hawk-john-bolton
Bloody hell. Something seemed a bit fishy about the timing of us seizing the tanker in Gibraltar.

Let's hope there's a clean way out of this cluster fk.

JuanCarlosFandango

7,792 posts

71 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Well now that we've fixed Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya Iran is the obvious next step.

Zarco

17,845 posts

209 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Depends on your definition of 'fix'.

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Does it matter?

If one of our ships was taken somewhere for whatever reason would we then take one back in revenge?

No we wouldn’t and no reasonable country would, they are scumbag terrorist supporting extremist who grow stronger the longer the civilised world tolerates their bullst .



Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Does it matter?
The fact that when Trumpo/Bolton say "Jump" we cravenly say "yes sir, please sir, how high sir?"

If we're going to get another 600 british soldiers killed I'd prefer it if they were defending OUR country and not acting like unpaid mercenaries for the US.

Countdown

39,885 posts

196 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
Pesty said:
No we wouldn’t and no reasonable country would, they are scumbag terrorist supporting extremist who grow stronger the longer the civilised world tolerates their bullst .
Do you mean the US, or Iran?

JuanCarlosFandango

7,792 posts

71 months

Sunday 21st July 2019
quotequote all
A very sarcastic definition.