Epstein dead in cell
Discussion
Reuters reporting 2
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-...
No idea on the provenance of the info.
What would be the procedure for a faulty camera? I expect that it ranges from not bothered through same day repair depending on where it is, motorway vs high security etc.
Operation wise there could be a few good reasons why they fail. The issue here is what procedure they have in place for monitoring prisoners? That is to say camera fails, log it and report it, mitigate the issues a failed camera can bring up and get camera repaired. Or are there other issues endemic in the way the place is run maybe budget, people lax or people on the ball and chasing higher ups for solutions that never arrive? I am guessing.
Problem is who is overall in charge and his record.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-...
No idea on the provenance of the info.
What would be the procedure for a faulty camera? I expect that it ranges from not bothered through same day repair depending on where it is, motorway vs high security etc.
Operation wise there could be a few good reasons why they fail. The issue here is what procedure they have in place for monitoring prisoners? That is to say camera fails, log it and report it, mitigate the issues a failed camera can bring up and get camera repaired. Or are there other issues endemic in the way the place is run maybe budget, people lax or people on the ball and chasing higher ups for solutions that never arrive? I am guessing.
Problem is who is overall in charge and his record.
La Liga said:
Your Twitter source said “cameras” so you need to find at least another faulty one.
fk me - I even quoted the bit where it said camera in the single and you're still arguing something different...La Liga said:
Byker28i said:
and yet I've provided plenty of information about where cameras are in the prison and the suicide watch cells that you also seem to be ignoring. The malfunctioning camera was also reported in several places, not just one source, so was cross checked.
So? That doesn't excuse a lack of basic due diligence for a significant claim.I'm not ignoring other parts. I'm merely highlighting you've done something you're very critical off in the Trump thread i.e. the spreading of misinformation as fact.
I wonder how many times you've done that with your 10 million posts in the Trump thread.
La Liga said:
used to nail people down who used to try and BS their way out of things, so old habits die hard.
A simple sorry will do Edited by Byker28i on Thursday 29th August 12:07
La Liga said:
To be fair your Twitter source was singular, the other was plural.
Either way, it was still not fact at the time (and still isn't), regardless if it turns out to be the case.
Still no apology then for your behaviour towards me? Reuters ok as another source? Either way, it was still not fact at the time (and still isn't), regardless if it turns out to be the case.
Two cameras that malfunctioned outside the jail cell where financier Jeffrey Epstein died as he awaited trial on sex-trafficking charges have been sent to an FBI crime lab for examination, a law enforcement source told Reuters.
The two cameras were within view of the Manhattan jail cell where he was found dead on Aug. 10. A source earlier told Reuters two jail guards failed to follow a procedure overnight to make separate checks on all prisoners every 30 minutes.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-...
You see the thing is, I provide news with links to the stories, you went full out accusing me of making stuff up. I think an apology is the least I should expect.
Edited by Byker28i on Friday 30th August 07:34
The legal proceedings against are officially over. Now it is time for the conspirators say the prosecutors. How far will this go.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/29/nyregion/jeffre...
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/29/nyregion/jeffre...
Byker28i said:
Still no apology then for your behaviour towards me?
At the time you wrote what you did it wasn't factually established and therefore you weren't entitled to say it was. I merely pointed that out.
If it turns out to factually be the case then you will be entitled to say it.
It's not complicated. It's really basic information assessment and it's odd you have such a hard time with it.
Digging into the deal of the millennium is starting. Will it get far.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/art...
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/art...
Mandelson, now there is a god... let’s see if any dirt sticks to that slime ball.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
Cupramax said:
Mandelson, now there is a god... let’s see if any dirt sticks to that slime ball.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
Leaving Mandy aside for the moment the most interesting thing in that article is that Epstein had 16 different phone numbers for Prince Andrew. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
That bloke needs to be real careful or some of the st is going to start to stick.
Casual acquaintance, my arse.
La Liga said:
I merely pointed that out.
You went full out attack on me"I'm not ignoring other parts. I'm merely highlighting you've done something you're very critical off in the Trump thread i.e. the spreading of misinformation as fact.
I wonder how many times you've done that with your 10 million posts in the Trump thread."
It wasn't misinformation. But I get it you won't accept you were wrong, nor will you apologise so I'll just drop it, but it's revealed your character.
The Hypno-Toad said:
Cupramax said:
Mandelson, now there is a god... let’s see if any dirt sticks to that slime ball.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
Leaving Mandy aside for the moment the most interesting thing in that article is that Epstein had 16 different phone numbers for Prince Andrew. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
That bloke needs to be real careful or some of the st is going to start to stick.
Casual acquaintance, my arse.
As that article said - even Stephen Hawking went to his Island...
I think Prince Andrews problem is he continued the friendship even after Epstein came out of jail.
Cupramax said:
Mandelson, now there is a god... let’s see if any dirt sticks to that slime ball.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
I think it's safe to assume Mandelson didn't do anything with Epstein's girls...https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
Looks like they went shopping together, so only crimes against fashion here. Oh, and mixing with the wrong people - but he's used to that being a politician.
A few dated pictures of various celebs on boats etc at parties. Hardly proof of guilt. The press are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill on every aspect & I’m amazed so many people think it’s all a massive conspiracy.
I’m sure I’m in the background of loads of dodgy photos back in the 90s but it wouldn’t mean st if it turns out 1 of the people there was a nonce. Yet it’s dished up as a major fact wherever epstein is concerned! All these rich people go to lots of parties, big deal.
I’m sure I’m in the background of loads of dodgy photos back in the 90s but it wouldn’t mean st if it turns out 1 of the people there was a nonce. Yet it’s dished up as a major fact wherever epstein is concerned! All these rich people go to lots of parties, big deal.
2002 said:
Cupramax said:
Mandelson, now there is a god... let’s see if any dirt sticks to that slime ball.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
I think it's safe to assume Mandelson didn't do anything with Epstein's girls...https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7412517/P...
Looks like they went shopping together, so only crimes against fashion here. Oh, and mixing with the wrong people - but he's used to that being a politician.
Mandelson for example.
Byker28i said:
You went full out attack on me
It wasn't misinformation.
Presenting something as a fact when it isn't established as such is spreading misinformation. It wasn't misinformation.
If it turns out to be factual in the future, that doesn't change what the information was or was not at the time.
It's not complicated to understand. It's the basic assessment of information.
Byker28i said:
But I get it you won't accept you were wrong, nor will you apologise so I'll just drop it, but it's revealed your character.
Nah, you should double down for the 15th time. Maybe it'll change what happened... Todays nutjob conspiracy theory
For people who are adherents to the QAnon conspiracy theory, making it up as you go along is mandatory, and wackjob Trump-loving “journalist” Liz Crokin does just that. According to her, Jeffrey Epstein didn’t commit suicide; he was either executed by a military tribunal or was allowed to be killed by the “Clinton mafia.”
“Jeffrey Epstein did not commit suicide,” Crokin said in video clip flagged by Right Wing Watch. “I can guarantee you that 100 percent.”
“If Jeffrey Epstein is dead, I believe that it possibly could have been an execution, and I believe he possibly could have already faced a military tribunal and been executed,” she said.
“The theory is that the good guys knew that the Clinton mafia would try to take Jeffrey Epstein out. The theory is that the white hats allowed Jeffrey Epstein to be a sitting duck and allowed the Clinton mafia to knock him off in a sting operation so they could bust the Clintons in the act.”
https://deadstate.org/right-wing-journalist-jeffre...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff