Poll: Election 2019
Total Members Polled: 1601
Discussion
Norfolkit said:
Politics Live just reported on a dust up in Leicester East (ex. Keith Vaz), looks like Corbyn/Momentum have forced a candidate (currently an Islington councillor and strong supporter of Corbyn) onto the local Labour Party against their wishes, the local party chairman has resigned and will be voting Conservative!
This has been brewing for a week or so. Lots of sour grapes. The favored local replacement for Vaz came out with a pretty racist diatribe against the selection.:Sundip Meghani said:
Worst of all, it is a slap in the face for the Indian community in Leicester and across Britain, to not only impose a non-Indian heritage candidate – in a seat with one of the highest Indian demographics in the country – but also a candidate who chaired Labour’s National Conference earlier this year when it passed an appalling anti-India motion. It sends entirely the wrong message and is an insult to the people I come from. It shows just how little the Labour Party values and respects the Indian community, particularly Hindus and Sikhs.
https://sundipmeghani.com/2019/11/12/east/So if you are not of Indian heritage you aren't suitable to represent Leicester East. apparently...
plasticpig said:
https://sundipmeghani.com/2019/11/12/east/
So if you are not of Indian heritage you aren't suitable to represent Leicester East. apparently...
but you are a rabid communist it seems.So if you are not of Indian heritage you aren't suitable to represent Leicester East. apparently...
plasticpig said:
https://sundipmeghani.com/2019/11/12/east/
So if you are not of Indian heritage you aren't suitable to represent Leicester East. apparently...
Bugger all to do with Indian heritage, the vaz family has been a big deal in local politics in Leicester for years its all about cast and tribe and political dynastiesSo if you are not of Indian heritage you aren't suitable to represent Leicester East. apparently...
Keith's mommy was a big cheese in the council
vaud said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Source? nothing showing on Google news, bbc, etc?https://twitter.com/search?q=%23arronbanksleaks&am...
Dont like rolls said:
but you are a rabid communist it seems.
Nope anarcho-capitalism is more my thing. Any candidate that doesn't leave a trail of slime behind them is better than Vaz. Labour are testing the aphorism "You could put a red rosette on a pig and they'd vote for it" to it's limits. I suspect Claudia Webbe will win but with far smaller majority.Digga said:
ChevyChase77 said:
Our Green Party candidate has a nose piercing. And they say we shouldn't stereotype. ;-)
Just she smell a bit like cabbage being boiled in a damp tent too?Asking for a friend.
ChevyChase77 said:
Digga said:
ChevyChase77 said:
Our Green Party candidate has a nose piercing. And they say we shouldn't stereotype. ;-)
Just she smell a bit like cabbage being boiled in a damp tent too?Asking for a friend.
plasticpig said:
Nope anarcho-capitalism is more my thing. Any candidate that doesn't leave a trail of slime behind them is better than Vaz. Labour are testing the aphorism "You could put a red rosette on a pig and they'd vote for it" to it's limits. I suspect Claudia Webbe will win but with far smaller majority.
At least webbe was born in the area the vaz family moved to Leicester stevesuk said:
Quite surprised that the LDs are doing so badly in the polls. They're pretty much the only party who have said they want to reverse Brexit, and we're led to believe that 50% of the electorate want that to happen - so why do only 16% intend to vote for them? Perhaps given the choice between Jo Swinson as PM, or hard Brexit - they've picked the safer option
think it's partly because of negative media attention and social media stuff coupled with not being able to take part in the tv debates, if people think they can't get in power I suspect they'll not want to waste their voteEarthdweller said:
bhstewie said:
I believe the latest YouGov poll showed that the more people see and hear Jo Swinson the more they dislike her.
I haven't seen it just heard it mentioned so don't know it was focusing on parties or leaders.
I’d tend to agree .. she comes across as a shouty sixth former with no depth I haven't seen it just heard it mentioned so don't know it was focusing on parties or leaders.
Her ability to do 360 degree U turns is another turn off
Her me me me attitude without actually providing any substance and just slagging BJ and Corbyn again is a turn off
Policies ?
Well I know they want to ignore and overturn the largest democratic vote ever ...one that she campaigned to have
Other than “Stopping Brexit” and promising to plant twice as many trees as the Tories
What else ?
I just dont see the point of them at all and coupled with the chance that a vote for them
“Could” put Corbyn in number 10
No chance
FiF said:
Earthdweller said:
bhstewie said:
I believe the latest YouGov poll showed that the more people see and hear Jo Swinson the more they dislike her.
I haven't seen it just heard it mentioned so don't know it was focusing on parties or leaders.
I’d tend to agree .. she comes across as a shouty sixth former with no depth I haven't seen it just heard it mentioned so don't know it was focusing on parties or leaders.
Her ability to do 360 degree U turns is another turn off
Her me me me attitude without actually providing any substance and just slagging BJ and Corbyn again is a turn off
Policies ?
Well I know they want to ignore and overturn the largest democratic vote ever ...one that she campaigned to have
Other than “Stopping Brexit” and promising to plant twice as many trees as the Tories
What else ?
I just dont see the point of them at all and coupled with the chance that a vote for them
“Could” put Corbyn in number 10
No chance
btw Earthdweller - a 360 degree change in policy would be no change in direction! Are you praising her consistency or have the numbers outwitted you?
R Mutt said:
Just caught the tail end of the news ticker, about plans to cut knife crime including swift trial for posession, without seeing who it came from, is a great idea, followed by a Labour proposal to delist companies that fail to tackle climate change.
The shocking thing is people would actually vote for the latter if those were the only 2 policies the parties stood on.
Knife crime is a conservative plan.The shocking thing is people would actually vote for the latter if those were the only 2 policies the parties stood on.
Just illustrates how mental Labour is.
They plan to delist a company (how i dont know). If that company doesnt meet their target on "make something up this week"
All the company will do is relist in New York, Singapore or Switzerland.
Way to go for the LSE value. Muppets.
jsf said:
Knife crime is a conservative plan.
Just illustrates how mental Labour is.
They plan to delist a company (how i dont know). If that company doesnt meet their target on "make something up this week"
All the company will do is relist in New York, Singapore or Switzerland.
Way to go for the LSE value. Muppets.
It's almost as if they have't had 9 years to be tackling knife crime.Just illustrates how mental Labour is.
They plan to delist a company (how i dont know). If that company doesnt meet their target on "make something up this week"
All the company will do is relist in New York, Singapore or Switzerland.
Way to go for the LSE value. Muppets.
Seriously, we need a General Election to be prosecuting people for knife possession quickly and it's a "conservative plan" even though they can't have been doing it very well or else why are they now announcing it as a bold new policy?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff