Boris Johnson- Prime Minister (Vol. 3)
Discussion
Gerradi said:
andymadmak said:
It's so clearly a spoof ( it says 'A website by Conservative Party in the middle of the landing page!! )
There is absolutely no way on this planet that anyone would be taken in by this and assume it was a genuine Labour site!
That being said - Once again is it factually incorrect?
1. Does Labour have a cohesive plan for Brexit?
2. Is Labour proposing higher taxes?
3. Is Labour proposing a second EU Referendum and a second Scottish Referendum?
Either way ..its going to bite Boris ...badly!!There is absolutely no way on this planet that anyone would be taken in by this and assume it was a genuine Labour site!
That being said - Once again is it factually incorrect?
1. Does Labour have a cohesive plan for Brexit?
2. Is Labour proposing higher taxes?
3. Is Labour proposing a second EU Referendum and a second Scottish Referendum?
They could fact check this on their own web site.
Zirconia said:
Oh those pesky young imps having fun at Tory head office creating fake web sites for the Labour Manifesto. Got to larf. I assume Boris has given it the stamp of approval.
Cummings learnt a lot from the US input I suppose.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/21/t...
Those imps must be stoked at the attention they're getting. Cummings learnt a lot from the US input I suppose.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/21/t...
andymadmak said:
Breadvan72 said:
andymadmak said:
Curious about your concern here - given your view that relatives/loved ones are not victims
That is not a view that I have ever held or expressed, so you will have to ask someone else. While you are at it, look up piss taking 101. It can come in handy when adventuring on the internet. HTH.Never mind, it's not the kind of things I would make jokes about personally, or take the piss out of, but each to their own I suppose.
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 21st November 23:29
deadslow said:
Mrr T said:
turbobloke said:
smn159 said:
Maybe there's an oven ready deal that we can just pop in the microwave?
Only if it's advertised on the side of a bus.Google said:
Your search - conservativefakelabourmanifesto.co.uk - did not match any documents.
So what group are responsible for "fair play" during an election (assuming there is such a thing) ?
Tories seem intent on misleading people this week.
How much more can they get away with before they are in trouble ?
On the other hand, are they really that desperate they have to keep trying cheap tricks ?
Boris was on the radio driving home, talking about how terrible the Labour Manifesto is, as usual he doesn't sound calm and measured, just a jumble of words thrown together.
Tories seem intent on misleading people this week.
How much more can they get away with before they are in trouble ?
On the other hand, are they really that desperate they have to keep trying cheap tricks ?
Boris was on the radio driving home, talking about how terrible the Labour Manifesto is, as usual he doesn't sound calm and measured, just a jumble of words thrown together.
Breadvan72 said:
Snip in the interests of brevity:
None of that matters to his fans. He will "Get Brexit done". Even that is a lie, but the fans don't care.
I understood Brexit to mean the act of leaving the EU. Which we will do, given a Tory majority, in January, once the last of the mince pies have been digested.None of that matters to his fans. He will "Get Brexit done". Even that is a lie, but the fans don't care.
The subsequent trade talks are post-Brexit. Boris's statement / slogan is, therefore, not a lie.
Brave Fart said:
I understood Brexit to mean the act of leaving the EU. Which we will do, given a Tory majority, in January, once the last of the mince pies have been digested.
The subsequent trade talks are post-Brexit. Boris's statement / slogan is, therefore, not a lie.
Except that until a trade deal is done we'll still be paying the EU and still abide by their rules.The subsequent trade talks are post-Brexit. Boris's statement / slogan is, therefore, not a lie.
So we will have left, still abiding by the EU rules, in other words all of the downsides and none of the positives of being in the EU.
Strikes me thats the worst possible situation to be in ?
Breadvan72 said:
This.
You are paying a very tiny percentage of the legal fees of the Government. The case is not aimed to bring the dead man back. It is to ask the Government for some transparency about why the driver was able to hoof it.
Out of interest, what is the normal procedure for court cases brought like this? If the people bringing the case lose, do they usually have to pay costs?You are paying a very tiny percentage of the legal fees of the Government. The case is not aimed to bring the dead man back. It is to ask the Government for some transparency about why the driver was able to hoof it.
Breadvan72 said:
Snip in the interests of brevity:
None of that matters to his fans. He will "Get Brexit done". Even that is a lie, but the fans don't care.
There are fans, but to others it's still a matter of the least worst alternative.None of that matters to his fans. He will "Get Brexit done". Even that is a lie, but the fans don't care.
For one of the alternatives, public uncertainty will be short-lived as organisations including the IFS get to comb through the Labour Party comic released today. It's packed full of marxist fantasy but their fans won't care. The difference is that these fantasists aren't the least worst alternative. This was previously evident and is becoming more so.
La Liga said:
A truly stylish and literate take down. La Liga said:
Those sort of things are even funnier when they're true or even true-ish. That would confer more style.
It's a good thing to be able to laugh at all sides of the current farce but that's a chuckle and nothing more due to being on the slab side of thick too frequently, a typically unsubtle and hyperbolic left field approach.
Crafty_ said:
Except that until a trade deal is done we'll still be paying the EU and still abide by their rules.
So we will have left, still abiding by the EU rules, in other words all of the downsides and none of the positives of being in the EU.
Strikes me thats the worst possible situation to be in ?
There's downsides? I was under the impression there were no downsides according to here.So we will have left, still abiding by the EU rules, in other words all of the downsides and none of the positives of being in the EU.
Strikes me thats the worst possible situation to be in ?
La Liga said:
Oh hell, that was me sold.....Wish they would put some effort into it. Torys promise everyone a free 99 or something.
768 said:
TriumphStag3.0V8 said:
I assume Diane's taking the train, I wonder if she's sharing her booze with Dawn Butler and anyone else not allowed on the bus.turbobloke said:
La Liga said:
Those sort of things are even funnier when they're true or even true-ish. That would confer more style.
It's a good thing to be able to laugh at all sides of the current farce but that's a chuckle and nothing more due to being on the slab side of thick too frequently, a typically unsubtle and hyperbolic left field approach.
Tuna said:
Out of interest, what is the normal procedure for court cases brought like this? If the people bringing the case lose, do they usually have to pay costs?
The general rule in all litigation is yes, but when a public interest issue is raised then the answer may be no. Given the nature of the issues raised by the Dunn case, it would be pretty standard for the Gov not to seek costs if successful. Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff