Jeremy Corbyn (Vol. 4)

Author
Discussion

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
Has anyone specified what a 'working class' background actually is?

Does simply earning leas than £80k qualify? Do you have to be a union member? If you don't have a job is that a disqualification or a qualification?

biggbn

23,289 posts

220 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
biggbn said:
R Mutt said:
That's a generalisation about others generalisations but looking at how widely they hold the notion that Tory voters are sort of villain, traitor, or worse if they're from a working class background, or otherwise an elitist Toff, then they're probably not that interested in the nuances.
Would that be like the generalisation that all labour voters are communist sympathising antisemite vegans who are professionaly offended and are far left Marxists?
Well, that will be all that is left soon, your question was about the future was it not ?
We are talking about voters, not mps, not party members. I think both polar opposites are equally wide of the mark but stereotyping makes things easy, doesn't it.

jonby

5,357 posts

157 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
R Mutt said:
jonby said:
Essentially, jews and the succesful are part of the same group in labour's eyes
That's a generalisation about others generalisations but looking at how widely they hold the notion that Tory voters are sort of villain, traitor, or worse if they're from a working class background, or otherwise an elitist Toff, then they're probably not that interested in the nuances.
Marxism in particular thrives on generalisations and polarisation at it's very core

In Marxism, capitalism depends on exploiting the workers. Capitalism is not just a financial model, but also a political one. You are either a worker being taken advantage of or a rich boss taking advantage of the workers

Every person, institution, class, etc has to fit into one of those two polar opposites

Hence all rich are evil

In turn, they have an absolute need to pigeonhole jews into one of those two categories. No guessing which we fall into. That, in a nutshell, is why AS is at the forefront in labour under corbyn and his closest supporters. It's why the party can't get rid of AS with him at the helm

So yes it's a generalisation and yes, politics in general across the spectrum has become more polarised. But it's always particularly prevalent in Marxists

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
jonby said:
Marxism in particular thrives on generalisations and polarisation at it's very core

In Marxism, capitalism depends on exploiting the workers. Capitalism is not just a financial model, but also a political one. You are either a worker being taken advantage of or a rich boss taking advantage of the workers

Every person, institution, class, etc has to fit into one of those two polar opposites

Hence all rich are evil

In turn, they have an absolute need to pigeonhole jews into one of those two categories. No guessing which we fall into. That, in a nutshell, is why AS is at the forefront in labour under corbyn and his closest supporters. It's why the party can't get rid of AS with him at the helm

So yes it's a generalisation and yes, politics in general across the spectrum has become more polarised. But it's always particularly prevalent in Marxists
This is pretty much spot on, in my opinion.

The far left requires a simplistic them vs us narrative. Its utterly divisive and poisonous.

jonby

5,357 posts

157 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
biggbn said:
R Mutt said:
That's a generalisation about others generalisations but looking at how widely they hold the notion that Tory voters are sort of villain, traitor, or worse if they're from a working class background, or otherwise an elitist Toff, then they're probably not that interested in the nuances.
Would that be like the generalisation that all labour voters are communist sympathising antisemite vegans who are professionaly offended and are far left Marxists?
That would be unfair but Corbyn & McDonnell, the two top men in labour, are indeed hard core far left marxists. Seamus Milne, probably the next most influential person in labour right now, is in some ways even more extreme and equally dangerous

biggbn

23,289 posts

220 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
jonby said:
biggbn said:
R Mutt said:
That's a generalisation about others generalisations but looking at how widely they hold the notion that Tory voters are sort of villain, traitor, or worse if they're from a working class background, or otherwise an elitist Toff, then they're probably not that interested in the nuances.
Would that be like the generalisation that all labour voters are communist sympathising antisemite vegans who are professionaly offended and are far left Marxists?
That would be unfair but Corbyn & McDonnell, the two top men in labour, are indeed hard core far left marxists. Seamus Milne, probably the next most influential person in labour right now, is in some ways even more extreme and equally dangerous
Yes. But the post was about voters, not party members.

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

58 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Yes. But the post was about voters, not party members.
His answer to you was in his first four words.

jakesmith

9,461 posts

171 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
ORD said:
jonby said:
Marxism in particular thrives on generalisations and polarisation at it's very core

In Marxism, capitalism depends on exploiting the workers. Capitalism is not just a financial model, but also a political one. You are either a worker being taken advantage of or a rich boss taking advantage of the workers

Every person, institution, class, etc has to fit into one of those two polar opposites

Hence all rich are evil

In turn, they have an absolute need to pigeonhole jews into one of those two categories. No guessing which we fall into. That, in a nutshell, is why AS is at the forefront in labour under corbyn and his closest supporters. It's why the party can't get rid of AS with him at the helm

So yes it's a generalisation and yes, politics in general across the spectrum has become more polarised. But it's always particularly prevalent in Marxists
This is pretty much spot on, in my opinion.

The far left requires a simplistic them vs us narrative. Its utterly divisive and poisonous.
Yes spot on

The absurdity of a Marxist government coming in and smashing this country’s fiscal structure to bits, to appease people who it has duped into believing they are poor, when they are amongst the worlds wealthiest with free housing, education and healthcare, is beyond parody. The price the poorest in this country will have to pay following such a government will be severe.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
Very much edited.

McDonell also lied when called on the no billionaires should exist quote. Watch again and see what he says.
full discusion here https://soundcloud.com/spectator1828/today-program...

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

54 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
jsf said:
The man is some form of genetic throwback !

Hereward

4,179 posts

230 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
ORD said:
jonby said:
Marxism in particular thrives on generalisations and polarisation at it's very core

In Marxism, capitalism depends on exploiting the workers. Capitalism is not just a financial model, but also a political one. You are either a worker being taken advantage of or a rich boss taking advantage of the workers

Every person, institution, class, etc has to fit into one of those two polar opposites

Hence all rich are evil

In turn, they have an absolute need to pigeonhole jews into one of those two categories. No guessing which we fall into. That, in a nutshell, is why AS is at the forefront in labour under corbyn and his closest supporters. It's why the party can't get rid of AS with him at the helm

So yes it's a generalisation and yes, politics in general across the spectrum has become more polarised. But it's always particularly prevalent in Marxists
This is pretty much spot on, in my opinion.

The far left requires a simplistic them vs us narrative. Its utterly divisive and poisonous.
yes

McDonnell earlier today:

"Those who’ve had it good for so long are terrified. Terrified of losing control. When they attack me, or Jeremy, we know it’s not really about us. It’s about you. They hate the people of this country.

“They hate the idea you might dream of a better life. No wonder they will stop at nothing to keep you from taking control of the country where you live.”

The great irony is that the above could be applied to McDonnell himself. I hate him more every day.

Source:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/john-mcdo...




R Mutt

5,891 posts

72 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
biggbn said:
jonby said:
biggbn said:
R Mutt said:
That's a generalisation about others generalisations but looking at how widely they hold the notion that Tory voters are sort of villain, traitor, or worse if they're from a working class background, or otherwise an elitist Toff, then they're probably not that interested in the nuances.
Would that be like the generalisation that all labour voters are communist sympathising antisemite vegans who are professionaly offended and are far left Marxists?
That would be unfair but Corbyn & McDonnell, the two top men in labour, are indeed hard core far left marxists. Seamus Milne, probably the next most influential person in labour right now, is in some ways even more extreme and equally dangerous
Yes. But the post was about voters, not party members.
There are a few people I know or know of who I could identify as Labour voters who aren't also in to the more extreme side. The funny thing is they are the ones who can offer a coherent rational explanation, like a teacher friend who was previously well paid for external drama and art classes before funding was cut, rectifying which is essentially somewhere at the back of the momentum Manifesto. The majority of vocal supporters see 'poor' as an umbrella for anyone homeless, killed by austerity, on benefits, up to front-line public sector workers, who are all poor because somehow their money has gone to everyone else. There was a guy in the audience for one of the debates who subsequently faced the ire of Momentum Facebookers after someone calculated he'd only lose a fiver a week of his 80 grand salary under Corbyn and was held up as the archetype of the the selfish rich man. Again absurd oversimplification and ignorance based on the fact that he was in the top 5% earners which is another odd Labour obsession despite being an arbitrary bracket statistically and ignoring the amount of tax already paid. Globally the Corbynistas themselves (if they have a job) are in the top 1% but they generally are selective over who they present in their data, somehow extending their examples of unfairness of US billionaires while excluding the millions starving as a result of communism and that's before you even get to Africa.

Edited by R Mutt on Monday 9th December 20:21

ntiz

2,339 posts

136 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
I would love to hear how the wealthy are keeping people down in this country??

Last time I checked everyone gets to go to school where you have the opportunity to build a future for yourself.

Of course there are those who have greater opportunity than others but how does that affect anyone else’s success??

I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth but I can’t think how that would affect anyone else’s opportunities. Surely billionaires actually create opportunities for others? Hasn’t someone like Dyson created loads of design jobs?

I know for a fact he has reinvested back into the school he went to although you could say that doesn’t help.

768

13,671 posts

96 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
ntiz said:
I would love to hear how the wealthy are keeping people down in this country??
Jews, innit.

ntiz said:
Last time I checked everyone gets to go to school where you have the opportunity to build a future for yourself.
Yeah, but private schools build one for you. They gave BoJo the PM job through contacts.

ntiz said:
Of course there are those who have greater opportunity than others but how does that affect anyone else’s success??
It's about equality of outcome. Even if that means we all get nothing.

ntiz said:
I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth but I can’t think how that would affect anyone else’s opportunities. Surely billionaires actually create opportunities for others? Hasn’t someone like Dyson created loads of design jobs?
Not in Venezuela he hasn't.

ntiz said:
I know for a fact he has reinvested back into the school he went to although you could say that doesn’t help.
That doesn't help.

Think that covers it. smile

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
How on Earth can they talk about ‘bringing people together’ when their key narrative is so hugely divisive and vicious? It’s astonishingly dishonest.

Captain Raymond Holt

12,230 posts

194 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
ORD said:
How on Earth can they talk about ‘bringing people together’ when their key narrative is so hugely divisive and vicious? It’s astonishingly dishonest.
The windows at Labour HQ are very very clean... on the inside.

R Mutt

5,891 posts

72 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
ntiz said:
I would love to hear how the wealthy are keeping people down in this country??

Last time I checked everyone gets to go to school where you have the opportunity to build a future for yourself.

Of course there are those who have greater opportunity than others but how does that affect anyone else’s success??

I was born with a silver spoon in my mouth but I can’t think how that would affect anyone else’s opportunities. Surely billionaires actually create opportunities for others? Hasn’t someone like Dyson created loads of design jobs?

I know for a fact he has reinvested back into the school he went to although you could say that doesn’t help.
Well I frequently observe nepotism at work which simply wouldn't be afforded to someone who didn't have wealthy connections. Although I'm from the same working class background as those who haven't done so well for themselves and bemoan the inequality, and the guy whose dad is mates with Richard Branson has left the job to go traveling anyway because he didn't actually need the money.

There's no system where this wouldn't exist. In fact the worst examples of this are seen under communism, or closer to home, in the criminal offspring of Labour MPs

Edited by R Mutt on Monday 9th December 21:13

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
Microsoft created three billionaires and an estimated 12,000 millionaires among Its employees by 2005.

Capitalist pigs!

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Microsoft created three billionaires and an estimated 12,000 millionaires among Its employees by 2005.

Capitalist pigs!
Bill Gates is the greatest human being in modern history. His wife is pretty damn good too thumbup

jakesmith

9,461 posts

171 months

Monday 9th December 2019
quotequote all
Burwood said:
Bill Gates is the greatest human being in modern history.
Unlike comrade Corbyn!