Coronavirus - the killer flu that will wipe us out? (Vol. 7)

Coronavirus - the killer flu that will wipe us out? (Vol. 7)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

turbobloke

103,942 posts

260 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
Oh no it is far worse than astonishing...
Get COVID-19, recover, months later, walk under a bus - and PHE reckons you died of COVID-19.

Or suffer any other totally unrelated fatal event and it's still a COVID-19 death.

How can Boris let it happen? Hyperashtonishing shtuff.

JagLover

42,399 posts

235 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
"Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures."

It's OK. Partial, inhomogeneous and basically inadequate data from various sources is fine if it facilitates a pop or two at the government from those who didn't vote for it and/or don't want it.
PHE yet again and setting out the case for their abolition yet again.


rover 623gsi

5,230 posts

161 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Vanden Saab said:
Oh no it is far worse than astonishing...
Get COVID-19, recover, months later, walk under a bus - and PHE reckons you died of COVID-19.

Or suffer any other totally unrelated fatal event and it's still a COVID-19 death.

How can Boris let it happen? Hyperashtonishing shtuff.
Bonkers

I’ve been posting figures here about the falling death rate - seems that in reality the numbers should be even smaller

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
MOTORVATOR said:
Whereas Sturgeon on the other hand claims no deaths and NRS says it is 13 but they don't count as the families can't register the deaths in time for her daily claims.
Scottish 5 year average deaths last 3-4 weeks is above that average.

English equivalent is below.

Say no more.

JagLover

42,399 posts

235 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Vanden Saab said:
Oh no it is far worse than astonishing...
Get COVID-19, recover, months later, walk under a bus - and PHE reckons you died of COVID-19.

Or suffer any other totally unrelated fatal event and it's still a COVID-19 death.
and given the age group of those likely to be hospitalised through this deaths from unconnected causes a few months later will be common enough to skew the figures a little.

vaud

50,469 posts

155 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
How can Boris let it happen? Hyperashtonishing shtuff.
Because they are an arms length body?

JagLover

42,399 posts

235 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
vaud said:
turbobloke said:
How can Boris let it happen? Hyperashtonishing shtuff.
Because they are an arms length body?
Yes part of the obsession to "depoliticise" public services by handing over power to Quangos. Boris's only authority over PHE is to hire and fire the Chief Executive.

We have seen the clear limitations of this approach in this crisis.

vaud

50,469 posts

155 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Yes part of the obsession to "depoliticise" public services by handing over power to Quangos. Boris's only authority over PHE is to hire and fire the Chief Executive.

We have seen the clear limitations of this approach in this crisis.
I don't disagree...


MOTORVATOR

6,993 posts

247 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
MOTORVATOR said:
Whereas Sturgeon on the other hand claims no deaths and NRS says it is 13 but they don't count as the families can't register the deaths in time for her daily claims.
Scottish 5 year average deaths last 3-4 weeks is above that average.

English equivalent is below.

Say no more.
Something looked odd when figures are published daily showing Scotland has two and a half times as many current Covid patients per capita as England.

poo at Paul's

14,147 posts

175 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
All these claims about the stats, this seems odd, as the daily briefing and subsequent pillar 1 and pillar 2 info clearly states two figures, one where Covid is the cause of death, the higher one where covid mentioned on the death certificate.

Excess deaths is then another calculation.
From memory, it is about 45l, 55k and 65k, respectively.

So is the claim that a person with a positive test, recovers, gets hit by us 3 m later, had Covid 19 as the cause of death, ie one of the 45k? Seems impossible for that to happen! I can however believe they may end up in the second category, ie cause of death, run over by bus, recent Covid 19 patient.
But ultimately, a death certificate needs to be signed off, and I cannot beleive any doctor attending or treating a trauma, would say someone died of Covid on a death certificate, there is a Dennis bumper impaled up their jacksie.

smashing

1,613 posts

161 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
All these claims about the stats, this seems odd, as the daily briefing and subsequent pillar 1 and pillar 2 info clearly states two figures, one where Covid is the cause of death, the higher one where covid mentioned on the death certificate.

Excess deaths is then another calculation.
From memory, it is about 45l, 55k and 65k, respectively.

So is the claim that a person with a positive test, recovers, gets hit by us 3 m later, had Covid 19 as the cause of death, ie one of the 45k? Seems impossible for that to happen! I can however believe they may end up in the second category, ie cause of death, run over by bus, recent Covid 19 patient.
But ultimately, a death certificate needs to be signed off, and I cannot beleive any doctor attending or treating a trauma, would say someone died of Covid on a death certificate, there is a Dennis bumper impaled up their jacksie.
That isn't what it is saying.

The death certificate can say whatever it likes but if PHE are looking at a database and seeing patient A tested for Covid == True and deceased == True then hey presto in the stats you go.

They aren't looking at the cause of death or the time lag between patient release/test date and death they are just checking that the person is dead.

mygoldfishbowl

3,701 posts

143 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
Has anyone else received one of these? On the back it says the tests only show if someone has the virus at this time and also that the tests are not 100% accurate. For that reason I am wondering whether to do it or not.





Edited by mygoldfishbowl on Friday 17th July 10:17

turbobloke

103,942 posts

260 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
smashing said:
poo at Paul's said:
All these claims about the stats, this seems odd, as the daily briefing and subsequent pillar 1 and pillar 2 info clearly states two figures, one where Covid is the cause of death, the higher one where covid mentioned on the death certificate.

Excess deaths is then another calculation.
From memory, it is about 45l, 55k and 65k, respectively.

So is the claim that a person with a positive test, recovers, gets hit by us 3 m later, had Covid 19 as the cause of death, ie one of the 45k? Seems impossible for that to happen! I can however believe they may end up in the second category, ie cause of death, run over by bus, recent Covid 19 patient.
But ultimately, a death certificate needs to be signed off, and I cannot beleive any doctor attending or treating a trauma, would say someone died of Covid on a death certificate, there is a Dennis bumper impaled up their jacksie.
That isn't what it is saying.

The death certificate can say whatever it likes but if PHE are looking at a database and seeing patient A tested for Covid == True and deceased == True then hey presto in the stats you go.

They aren't looking at the cause of death or the time lag between patient release/test date and death they are just checking that the person is dead.
Exactly that.

As stated it's shuper ashtonishing.

mygoldfishbowl

3,701 posts

143 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
smashing said:
You may want to edit out some of those details in the upload.
Yeah thanks, missed that. If you could edit your quote I think we'll be there. smile

cymatty

589 posts

70 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
Mancock said:
Health Secretary Matt Hancock has called for an urgent review into the compilation of coronavirus deaths data in England.
It follows confirmation that reported deaths may have included people who tested positive months before they died.
Scotland and Northern Ireland only include people who die within 28 days of having coronavirus.
Public Health England is responsible for reporting Covid-19 deaths.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53443724

Busted.

mygoldfishbowl

3,701 posts

143 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
[redacted]

smashing

1,613 posts

161 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
all done hopefully

steveo3002

10,521 posts

174 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
mygoldfishbowl said:
Has anyone else received one of these? On the back it says the tests only show if someone has the virus at this time and also that the tests are not 100% accurate. For that reason I am wondering whether to do it or not.





Edited by mygoldfishbowl on Friday 17th July 10:17
mrs got one...we slung it out

Brave Fart

5,721 posts

111 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
So PHE's Covid stats are compiled in a different way to Scotland for example? The cause of death in care homes is commonly not queried by a doctor, apparently. Other countries report their numbers on a different basis to the UK, it seems. Then there's China and Russia's numbers. laugh

And yet we have endless posts on here asserting this or that point to support the poster's argument. It makes me wonder whether any of the official reported numbers can be trusted, and how much the numbers are "massaged" for political ends.

motco

15,951 posts

246 months

Friday 17th July 2020
quotequote all
As far as my researches have shown, this is not a joke!



The web address exists...
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED