Boris Johnson- Prime Minister (Vol. 4)
Discussion
It is nice to see the young footballer that Boris has heavily relied upon is recognised for his valued Gov guidance.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-england-m...
Well done Dr Marcus Rashford!
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-soccer-england-m...
Well done Dr Marcus Rashford!
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
Oh, and I forgot to include Dr Marcus Rashford in my list of potential UK decision makers!
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his back benchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
Oh, and I forgot to include Dr Marcus Rashford in my list of potential UK decision makers!
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his backbenchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
IDS has been very vocal in regards Huawei, as have many other backbenchers, it's not new, it's not important though when some have an agenda.
de Pfeffel? Only a juvenile repeatedly uses a name that is rarely, if ever used when referring to Boris Jonson.
markyb_lcy said:
s2art said:
The government, obviously. It just took them a little long to see sense.
Did they see sense though or is this a case of succumbing to US pressure?Fwiw I think this is the right decision but it should have been taking some time ago.
s2art said:
markyb_lcy said:
s2art said:
The government, obviously. It just took them a little long to see sense.
Did they see sense though or is this a case of succumbing to US pressure?Fwiw I think this is the right decision but it should have been taking some time ago.
Unknown_User said:
So who is actually in charge of the UK?
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
No, you are. With your great wit and humorous name calling, you're running the place.Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
I'd be interested to hear what you think the UK should do in the circumstances? Militantly buy Huawei kit against the advice of most security experts? Ditch it at great expense the moment someone raises the slightest concern? Rather than repeatedly posting the same question in an attempt to goad, what are you calling for the government to do with regards to China?
Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to this. I had thought that Boris and co were happy with the Chinese tech and, plucky little Englanders, were standing up to the oppressive might of the Donald and ploughing their pwn furrow by using the best and most cost effective equipment available?
Has that changed now?
Has that changed now?
biggbn said:
Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to this. I had thought that Boris and co were happy with the Chinese tech and, plucky little Englanders, were standing up to the oppressive might of the Donald and ploughing their pwn furrow by using the best and most cost effective equipment available?
Has that changed now?
Not sure it’s the tech itself that is the perceived problem. Has that changed now?
And iirc GCHQ has given an updated warning to HMG.
So perhaps the words “were happy” are the operative ones.
biggbn said:
Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to this. I had thought that Boris and co were happy with the Chinese tech and, plucky little Englanders, were standing up to the oppressive might of the Donald and ploughing their pwn furrow by using the best and most cost effective equipment available?
Has that changed now?
Yes. Has that changed now?
Trump put sanctions on Huawei which restricts their access to US technology. While they produce their own kit, the chips (specifically the chip designs) are American in origin and without access to software which designs the brain of the stuff it means they will either have inferior kit, or chips designed by Chinese software which is much harder to be happy its secure.
Tuna said:
Unknown_User said:
So who is actually in charge of the UK?
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
No, you are. With your great wit and humorous name calling, you're running the place.Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
I'd be interested to hear what you think the UK should do in the circumstances? Militantly buy Huawei kit against the advice of most security experts? Ditch it at great expense the moment someone raises the slightest concern? Rather than repeatedly posting the same question in an attempt to goad, what are you calling for the government to do with regards to China?
Other 5G suppliers were/are available but at a cost. What would you prefer our country had, a 5G rollout that costs extra or one that might compromise national security? Or one that panders to Trump?
don'tbesilly said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
s2art said:
Unknown_User said:
Sadly we have now completely subjugated our domestic infrastructure policy to the Trump White House.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Alternatively No 10 has finally seen sense and listened to his backbenchers. It took far too long.https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-huawei-t...
Is it Dom Cum? Or de Pfeffel? Or Donald Trump? Or some mysterious back benchers?
IDS has been very vocal in regards Huawei, as have many other backbenchers, it's not new, it's not important though when some have an agenda.
de Pfeffel? Only a juvenile repeatedly uses a name that is rarely, if ever used when referring to Boris Jonson.
If you are going to call out people for using our PM's name, then please would you spell Johnson correctly?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff