Missing Woman Sarah Everard
Discussion
PurpleTurtle said:
.
He might actually be mentally ill, or he may well be playing the system to get off with murder. Time will tell.
To a non-legal, non police person this side of things always seems a bit strange. Almost by definition someone who’ll kidnap, rape and kill a stranger doesn’t have a mind that sees the world the same as the rest of us do, and must be verging in, to use the colloquial term, “mental”.He might actually be mentally ill, or he may well be playing the system to get off with murder. Time will tell.
Where’s the line that says that you’re just mental enough that it wasn’t really your fault?
A few new things we have learned?
- He used a hire car, booked and paid under his own details
- There is bus CCTV of his car parked on the pavement and two figures, assumed to be both of them
- He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
- He wiped his phone 39 minutes before being arrested (perhaps there was some communication about his work situation etc that made him realise the game was up?)
- He used a hire car, booked and paid under his own details
- There is bus CCTV of his car parked on the pavement and two figures, assumed to be both of them
- He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
- He wiped his phone 39 minutes before being arrested (perhaps there was some communication about his work situation etc that made him realise the game was up?)
Edited by Gareth79 on Friday 9th July 12:06
Gareth79 said:
A few new things we have learned?
- He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
What has that got to do with him going out a raping and murdering an innocent young lady?. At the end of the day I think he is a bully who thought he could do what he wanted and get away with it and now hopefully he will die in prison. - He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
mick987 said:
Gareth79 said:
A few new things we have learned?
- He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
What has that got to do with him going out a raping and murdering an innocent young lady?. At the end of the day I think he is a bully who thought he could do what he wanted and get away with it and now hopefully he will die in prison. - He original story involved being threatened by eastern europeans after underpaying a prostitute (I wonder if there is probably a kernel of truth to this?)
Edited by Gareth79 on Friday 9th July 12:17
I imagine his lawyer has said "the number of aspects to the planning of this, a jury is never going to believe it was diminished responsibility, you are going away for a very long time because of a stack of evidence against you. Plead guilty, it's the best you can hope for in determining your minimum term"
Let's hope that minimum term is at least 30 years. I don't think this will have been his first crime.
Let's hope that minimum term is at least 30 years. I don't think this will have been his first crime.
Gareth79 said:
The kernel of truth is that perhaps he did use prostitutes, underpaid one and was threatened by eastern europeans recently, and it came to mind when concocting a story. And what does it have to do with him doing his crime? A married police officer using trafficked prostitutes run by eastern european gangs would go perfectly with the behaviour of somebody who then goes out and murders a seemingly random person.
He claimed he was forced to kidnap her after underpaying for a prostitute, complete bullst and anybody who thinks there is a kernel of truth to that wants to have a long hard look at themselves. Edited by Gareth79 on Friday 9th July 12:17
mick987 said:
Gareth79 said:
The kernel of truth is that perhaps he did use prostitutes, underpaid one and was threatened by eastern europeans recently, and it came to mind when concocting a story. And what does it have to do with him doing his crime? A married police officer using trafficked prostitutes run by eastern european gangs would go perfectly with the behaviour of somebody who then goes out and murders a seemingly random person.
He claimed he was forced to kidnap her after underpaying for a prostitute, complete bullst and anybody who thinks there is a kernel of truth to that wants to have a long hard look at themselves. Edited by Gareth79 on Friday 9th July 12:17
mick987 said:
liner33 said:
Where did all this about prostitutes and Eastern Europeans come from ?
In one of the first police interviews Couzens claimed that was why he killed the lady, he soon stopped claiming that when nobody believed him and never mentioned it again. liner33 said:
Were these interviews published then ?
They have been reported in the presswww.scotsman.com/news/crime/sarah-everard-metropol...
mick987 said:
liner33 said:
Were these interviews published then ?
They have been reported in the presswww.scotsman.com/news/crime/sarah-everard-metropol...
AW111 said:
mick987 said:
liner33 said:
Where did all this about prostitutes and Eastern Europeans come from ?
In one of the first police interviews Couzens claimed that was why he killed the lady, he soon stopped claiming that when nobody believed him and never mentioned it again. Now that he’s finally admitted directly killing her that story is one of note because it’s what he originally came up with.
I’m inclined to believe the story is completely made up, by someone who would know about those kinds of criminal circles either directly or from colleagues.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff