No evidence the UK is institutionally racist
Discussion
Unknown_User said:
As previously posted.
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
Save your breath mate - if someone’s willing to believe that feminism is a giant conspiracy to create a majority of welfare dependent lefties then they’re unlikely to be convinced by, like, actual facts and stuff…https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
jimbobs said:
Unknown_User said:
As previously posted.
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
Save your breath mate - if someone’s willing to believe that feminism is a giant conspiracy to create a majority of welfare dependent lefties then they’re unlikely to be convinced by, like, actual facts and stuff…https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
ked things up so badly that by 2010 that he had forecast that the UK would need austerity so severe that would take "two parliamentary terms of pain" i.e. 2010 to 2018 to get things back in order. Labour advocates often mention the 10 years of Tory austerity that it took to bring Labour's legacy of deficit profligacy under control whilst being wilfully ignorant of the fact that Labour were planning austerity measures that were every bit as severe as the Torys'. You knew all about Darling's forecasts in 2010 right? That he was expecting it take a full decade of austerity misery to get things back on track? You knew that bearing in mind that you're convinced by actual facts and and stuff.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/mar/25/a...
Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 22 June 16:59
Crackie said:
jimbobs said:
Unknown_User said:
As previously posted.
https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
Save your breath mate - if someone’s willing to believe that feminism is a giant conspiracy to create a majority of welfare dependent lefties then they’re unlikely to be convinced by, like, actual facts and stuff…https://ifs.org.uk/publications/15025
There were large increases over the 2000s but spending per pupil has fallen since 2010–11.
ked things up so badly that by 2010 that he had forecast that the UK would need austerity so severe that would take "two parliamentary terms of pain" i.e. 2010 to 2018 to get things back in order. Labour advocates often mention the 10 years of Tory austerity that it took to bring Labour's legacy of deficit profligacy under control whilst being wilfully ignorant of the fact that Labour were planning austerity measures that were every bit as severe as the Torys'. You knew all about Darling's forecasts in 2010 right? That he was expecting it take a full decade of austerity misery to get things back on track? You knew that bearing in mind that you're convinced by actual facts and and stuff.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/mar/25/a...
Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 22 June 16:59
Labour messed things up so the tories decided to reduce funding to make things better? And those up there ^^^ saying there was no austerity are wrong and you are right!
Hurrah the tories….. hurrah The Nasty Party….. boo Labour (that nobody was talking about).
We’re most fortunate to have you here Crackie, most fortunate indeed!!!
Looks like there's a few concerns around the language used.
Watchdog cited in education report condemns its ‘awful’ language
Watchdog cited in education report condemns its ‘awful’ language
Drumroll said:
What a load of idealistic rubbish.
How are you going to raise confident, ambitious, children when you live in a one bedroom flat that is falling to pieces and despite working jobs that are low paid you still can't afford to move. if you allow your kids to go out to play the only play area is full of gang members etc.
It’s difficult, which is why it’s generally a good idea to try to get established in your career, maybe buy your own home, and get some savings behind you before having children.How are you going to raise confident, ambitious, children when you live in a one bedroom flat that is falling to pieces and despite working jobs that are low paid you still can't afford to move. if you allow your kids to go out to play the only play area is full of gang members etc.
This is why a lot of professional couples have children later, they understand that it’s generally a good idea.
You can’t remove parental choice and responsibility from the equation when it comes to life outcomes.
Unknown_User said:
So tell me Einstein, how does a nurse working at the Chelsea & Kensington, St Thomas or St Barts hospital afford a crappy flat near their place of work? You know, without you or me paying for it?
They don’t need a flat near their work, there’s a system of buses and of underground trains in London, which millions of people use to get to and from work each day.ZedLeg said:
Of course, it's all those immigrants coming over and snapping up all the £10mil houses in London. Although if you count middle eastern royal families and Russian oligarchs as immigrants I guess you're not wrong 
My boss is an immigrant. He has a £10m house.My wife’s an immigrant too actually. None of her houses is worth £10m though.
Northernboy said:
Unknown_User said:
So tell me Einstein, how does a nurse working at the Chelsea & Kensington, St Thomas or St Barts hospital afford a crappy flat near their place of work? You know, without you or me paying for it?
They don’t need a flat near their work, there’s a system of buses and of underground trains in London, which millions of people use to get to and from work each day.If you live in London accept the compromises. Us in the sticks do
Northernboy said:
ZedLeg said:
Of course, it's all those immigrants coming over and snapping up all the £10mil houses in London. Although if you count middle eastern royal families and Russian oligarchs as immigrants I guess you're not wrong
My boss is an immigrant. He has a £10m house.My wife’s an immigrant too actually. None of her houses is worth £10m though.
You stalking me now?
voyds9 said:
Alternatively, move, the NHS isn't just London we actually have hospitals in other parts of the country, perhaps even somewhere where it is cheaper to live.
If you live in London accept the compromises. Us in the sticks do
Those of us in banking do too. Even if you’re on exceptionally good money you’ll likely end up commuting.If you live in London accept the compromises. Us in the sticks do
The idea that anyone should expect a nice flat a short stroll from their job in Chelsea just isn’t a sensible one.
Unknown_User said:
jimbobs said:
The schools report is just another example of this government blaming someone else for its own failings.
The failures in education are caused by years of chronic underfunding as a result of Tory austerity. This hits the poor (and thus, the white working class poor) hardest. Sadly, Boris and his chums would rather blame lefty teachers for the problem than own up to their own failings.
The failures in education are caused by years of chronic underfunding as a result of Tory austerity. This hits the poor (and thus, the white working class poor) hardest. Sadly, Boris and his chums would rather blame lefty teachers for the problem than own up to their own failings.
Great post
Do you think that chronic education system underfunding would have been likely if Labour had been in power instead? If not, and bearing in mind Alistair Darling has admitted that Labour would have introduced similar levels of austerity to the coalition, which public sectors do you think Labour would/should have chronically underfunded instead?
Crackie said:
Unknown_User said:
jimbobs said:
The schools report is just another example of this government blaming someone else for its own failings.
The failures in education are caused by years of chronic underfunding as a result of Tory austerity. This hits the poor (and thus, the white working class poor) hardest. Sadly, Boris and his chums would rather blame lefty teachers for the problem than own up to their own failings.
The failures in education are caused by years of chronic underfunding as a result of Tory austerity. This hits the poor (and thus, the white working class poor) hardest. Sadly, Boris and his chums would rather blame lefty teachers for the problem than own up to their own failings.
Great post
Do you think that chronic education system underfunding would have been likely if Labour had been in power instead? If not, and bearing in mind Alistair Darling has admitted that Labour would have introduced similar levels of austerity to the coalition, which public sectors do you think Labour would/should have chronically underfunded instead?
Unknown_User said:
The reality is, the tories were in power, this is an irrefutable fact, regardless of your continued but... but... but Labour insistence.
The Tories were indeed in power and so were the Lib Dems for a period. Where do you place the Lib Dems contribution in all of this, are you Grrr Lib/Dems too? Fortunately the Labour administration were given the boot in 2010 before they could do any more damage; a Lib-Dem / Tory coalition and then the Tories have been in power since. Labour's profligate spending following the GFC contributed to all the major parties, including Labour, deciding that austerity measures were necessary in 2010. Nothing wrong, in my eyes, with reminding you of the facts when someone posts some daft nonsense about Tory austerity whilst failing to fully acknowledge Labour's damaging role in the country's immediate financial history and also failing to accept that Labour, by their own admission, were planning similar austerity cuts.
Grrrrr Nasty Party.
Crackie said:
The Tories were indeed in power and so were the Lib Dems for a period. Where do you place the Lib Dems contribution in all of this, are you Grrr Lib/Dems too?
Fortunately the Labour administration were given the boot in 2010 before they could do any more damage; a Lib-Dem / Tory coalition and then the Tories have been in power since. Labour's profligate spending following the GFC contributed to all the major parties, including Labour, deciding that austerity measures were necessary in 2010. Nothing wrong, in my eyes, with reminding you of the facts when someone posts some daft nonsense about Tory austerity whilst failing to fully acknowledge Labour's damaging role in the country's immediate financial history and also failing to accept that Labour, by their own admission, were planning similar austerity cuts.
Grrrrr Nasty Party.
Don't rise to it Crackie. He's a troll.Fortunately the Labour administration were given the boot in 2010 before they could do any more damage; a Lib-Dem / Tory coalition and then the Tories have been in power since. Labour's profligate spending following the GFC contributed to all the major parties, including Labour, deciding that austerity measures were necessary in 2010. Nothing wrong, in my eyes, with reminding you of the facts when someone posts some daft nonsense about Tory austerity whilst failing to fully acknowledge Labour's damaging role in the country's immediate financial history and also failing to accept that Labour, by their own admission, were planning similar austerity cuts.
Grrrrr Nasty Party.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff